Breast cancer follow-up after curative treatment is currently based on largely uniform imaging surveillance strategies, despite substantial variation in recurrence risk across patient subgroups. Early detection of recurrences improves prognosis, particularly when detected by imaging rather than symptoms, but the optimal surveillance approach remains uncertain. Mammographic sensitivity is lower in breast cancer survivors than in screening populations, and interval cancers occur more frequently, especially among younger patients, those with dense breasts, aggressive tumor subtypes, or without radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. This multicenter, open-label, register-based randomized controlled trial evaluates risk-stratified imaging surveillance after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. The study investigates whether more sensitive imaging methods, compared with standard mammographic follow-up, lead to earlier detection of ipsilateral recurrences and contralateral second primary breast cancers in patients at increased risk of recurrence. The primary endpoint is the number of interval ipsilateral recurrences and contralateral second primary breast cancers detected within five years from index diagnosis. Secondary endpoints include stage at detection, breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, recall rate, biopsy rate, false positive findings, and health-related quality of life.
The effectiveness of current breast cancer follow-up guidelines after curative treatment remains uncertain. Although early detection of local recurrences is associated with improved survival, particularly when identified through imaging rather than symptoms, evidence supporting the optimal intensity and modality of post-treatment surveillance is limited. Current follow-up recommendations are largely uniform, despite well-established variation in recurrence risk related to age, tumor subtype, surgical margins, adjuvant therapy, and breast density. Younger patients and those with non-luminal tumor subtypes have a substantially higher risk of recurrence. Mammographic sensitivity is lower in breast cancer survivors compared with screening populations, and the incidence of interval cancers is significantly higher. Risk factors for interval-detected recurrences include young age, dense breast tissue, omission of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery, and biologically aggressive tumors. Supplemental imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) have shown higher sensitivity and may improve detection in higher-risk groups, but current evidence is insufficient to support broad implementation of risk-based surveillance strategies. This study is a multicenter, open-label, register-based randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate a stratified imaging surveillance approach after curative treatment for breast cancer. The objective is to determine whether the use of more sensitive imaging methods, compared with standard mammographic surveillance, results in earlier detection of ipsilateral recurrences and contralateral second primary breast cancers in patients with increased risk of recurrence following breast-conserving surgery. The primary endpoint is the number of interval-detected ipsilateral recurrences and contralateral second primary breast cancers within five years from index breast cancer diagnosis. Secondary endpoints include stage at diagnosis, breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, recall rate, biopsy rate, number of false positive findings, and health-related quality of life.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
2,300
Surveillance using more sensitive breast imaging modalities such as MRI or contrast-enhanced mammography based on recurrence risk.
Routine follow-up with mammography according to current clinical guidelines.
Interval Ipsilateral Recurrences and Contralateral Second Primary Breast Cancers
Number of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrences and contralateral second primary breast cancers detected between scheduled surveillance examinations.
Time frame: From index breast cancer diagnosis up to 5 years
Stage at Diagnosis of Recurrences and Second Primary Breast Cancers
Tumor stage at diagnosis of ipsilateral recurrences and contralateral second primary breast cancers
Time frame: Up to 5 years from index diagnosis
Breast Cancer-Specific Survival
Survival without death attributed to breast cancer
Time frame: Up to 5 years from index diagnosis
Overall Survival
Survival from any cause
Time frame: Up to 5 years from index diagnosis
Recall Rate
Proportion of surveillance examinations leading to recall for additional diagnostic assessment
Time frame: During the 5-year surveillance period
Biopsy Rate
Number of biopsies performed following surveillance imaging
Time frame: During the 5-year surveillance period
False Positive Findings
Number of surveillance findings leading to diagnostic workup without cancer diagnosis
Time frame: During the 5-year surveillance period
Health-Related Quality of Life
Measured using validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) questionnaires collected within the Swedish National Breast Cancer Quality Registry (Nationellt Kvalitetsregister för Bröstcancer).Patient-reported quality of life will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (core cancer quality-of-life questionnaire) and the breast cancer-specific module QLQ-BR23, developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.Scores are calculated according to each instrument's scoring manual and transformed to standardized scales (0-100 or instrument-specific ranges). Higher scores indicate better function/global quality of life
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 6 months, 12 months, and 3 years after diagnosis.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.