The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the early results of Active Apex Correction (APC) technique for managing early onset scoliosis.
Early onset scoliosis (EOS) presents a significant clinical challenge due to progressive spinal deformity during critical periods of spinal and thoracic growth. Inadequate management may result in thoracic insufficiency, impaired pulmonary development, and long-term cardiopulmonary morbidity. Achieving deformity control while preserving spinal growth remains the primary treatment goal. Conservative strategies such as bracing and serial casting may delay progression but are often insufficient, necessitating surgical intervention.Early definitive spinal fusion arrests spinal growth and causes truncal shortening. Growth-friendly, non-fusion techniques preserve spinal growth while controlling deformity. Traditional growing rods (TGR) require repeated surgical lengthening, resulting in high complication risks including infection, implant failure, and unplanned reoperations. Repeated distractions may lead to unintended spinal autofusion, compromising growth potential. Magnetically controlled growing rods reduce repeated surgeries but remain costly with mechanical failure risks. The Shilla system allows spinal growth but faces loss of correction and implant failure. Active Apex Correction (APC) is a relatively novel growth-friendly surgical technique, first innovated approximately 16 years ago, gaining increasing international interest recently. APC, a Shilla modification, addresses limitations of existing growth-preserving strategies. APC employs a single surgical procedure with unilateral convex-side compression at the curve apex, allowing guided spinal growth while avoiding concave-side instrumentation, osteotomies, and repeated lengthening procedures. This approach may reduce operative time, implant density, infection risk, and treatment cost. However, despite theoretical advantages, clinical data on APC remain limited. Therefore, evaluating radiographic correction, growth preservation, and clinical outcomes with APC is necessary to define its role in managing EOS.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
15
• Active Apex Correction (APC) begins with the identification of the curve apex and the selection of upper and lower "foundation" vertebrae, where pedicle screws are placed on the convex side only, above and below the most wedged vertebrae. No screws are inserted on the concave side, avoiding the need for osteotomies at the apex. The rods are then connected to both upper and lower foundation constructs, contoured to maintain appropriate sagittal alignment.
Assiut University Hospital
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt
Spinal Length Correction (T1-T12 and T1-S1) in millimeters.
Spinal length will be assessed on standing full-spine radiographs at the latest postoperative follow-up. Measurements will include the distance from T1 to T12 and from T1 to S1 in millimeters.
Time frame: At latest follow-up (1 year postoperative)
Percentage of correction of the primary curve (%).
The Cobb angle of the primary scoliotic curve will be measured on preoperative and latest postoperative standing radiographs. The correction will be calculated in Percentage (%).
Time frame: one year postoperative
Thoracic Kyphosis Angle (Cobb Method) in degrees
Thoracic kyphosis will be measured on lateral standing radiographs between T1 and T12 using the Cobb angle method. The angle will be recorded in degrees (°) at the latest postoperative follow-up.
Time frame: one year postoperative
Number of Participants with Postoperative Complications.
All complications (infection, implant failure, neurological deficit, wound issues) within one year postoperative will be recorded.
Time frame: one year postoperative
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.