The goal of the study is to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of solifenacin plus gabapentin versus solifenacin monotherapy for the treatment of women who are suffering from non-neurogenic ОАВ. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does combination of Solifenacin and Gabapentin affect the total score and sub-scores of OABSS in females with non-neurogenic ОАВ ? What medical problems do participants have when taking combination of Solifenacin and gabapentin ?
Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is defined as a pathological condition characterized by urinary urgency, with or without incontinence, urinary frequency and nocturia in the absence of infection or other identifiable pathology. Global prevalence among women is estimated to be 21.9% with even higher prevalence among Egyptian women suggested to be around 57%. The pathophysiology of overactive bladder is incompletely understood. The underlying mechanism behind OAB symptoms is often detrusor overactivity (DOA), which has been linked to bladder ischemia and oxidative stress. Also, it is believed to be related to dysfunction within the nervous system, ranging from cortical and brainstem command centers to afferent signaling at the urothelial level. Also it is may be related to spontaneous activity in the detrusor muscle which can lead to involuntary contractions and urgency sensations, even without abnormal nerve stimulation. Antimuscarinic agents, such as solifenacin, are considered first-line pharmacological therapy after failure of conservative measures. However, the efficacy as a monotherapy is limited, and many patients experience persistent symptoms. Therefore, combination therapy using antimuscarinics and other agents such as B3 agonists has been proven to have more efficacy compared to monotheraрy. Currently the focus of OAB treatment has changed to other bladder structures and mechanisms, such as modulation of bladder afferent outflow and urothelial signaling as targets for intervention. Gabapentin, a neuromodulator commonly used for neuropathic pain, has shown potential benefits in bladder hypersensitivity and sensory urgency due to its inhibitory effect on afferent C fiber activity, as these fibers demonstrate remarkable plasticity, which is involved in the micturition reflex to the spinal tract. Several randomized controlled trials and cohort studies have demonstrated some improvement in OAB symptoms with minimal adverse effects following gabapentin administration, supporting its potential use as a treatment for OAB. However, the vast majority of studies are done in neurogenic bladder, had relatively small sample sizes and modest treatment effects, and only very few studies are done in non-neurogenic bladders. In this study, it is assumed that combination therapy of solifenacin and gabapentin may provide synergistic effects, improving both detrusor overactivity and sensory urgency, leading to better patient outcomes than solifenacin monotherapy.
using solifenacin combined with gabapentin for treatment of non-neurogenic overactive bladder in women
solifenacin monotherapy for treatment of non-neurogenic overactive bladder in women
Urology and Nephrology center - Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Egypt
Change from baseline in the total score and sub-scores of Overactive Bladder Symptom Score at follow-up visits.
the study will assess the change in total score of overactive bladder symptom score (0-15) before and after recieving the treatment, as the minimum value (0) means better outcome, and maximum value (15) means worse outcome, also it will assess the change in the sub-scores such as : frequency : (0-2) , nocturia : (0-3) , urgency : (0-5) , urge incontinence : (0-5) where minimum values mean better outcome, and maximum values mean worse outcome.
Time frame: 90 days
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events
each patient will be followed up every 6 weeks during the 3 months period and surveyed for side effects. The number of patients who experienced side effects will be compared between the two groups and compare the number of patients who subsequently discontinued the treatment.
Time frame: 90 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
60