The aim of this quasi-experimental, pretest-posttest study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Vivifrail multicomponent physical exercise program in improving the functional capacity of pre-frail and frail older adults (aged 70 and older) attending the Virgen del Mar Health Center in Almería. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does functional capacity, as measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), significantly improve after participating in the Vivifrail program? * What is the effect of the Vivifrail program on various geriatric syndromes and associated health conditions (e.g., fall risk, sarcopenia, chronic pain, mild cognitive impairment, depression), and what patient profile is most likely to benefit from the intervention? * As a single-arm interventional study, there is no parallel comparison group. Researchers will compare each participant's outcomes against their own baseline at three time points (baseline, week 6, and week 12) to assess for significant improvements following the intervention. Participants will: * Complete a 12-week home-based, multicomponent physical exercise program (five sessions per week including strength, balance, flexibility, and aerobic endurance training), tailored to their baseline functional level. * Attend three in-person visits at the health center (baseline, a 6-week follow-up, and a final visit at 12 weeks) for the research staff to assess their clinical, functional, and sociodemographic variables. * Complete an Activity Diary to record their home-based sessions and perceived rate of exertion in order to monitor adherence. * Receive biweekly follow-up phone calls from the research team to reinforce motivation, track adherence, and monitor for any potential adverse events (e.g., falls, pain).
1. Theoretical Framework and Study Rationale Population aging poses a crucial challenge for healthcare systems. In Spain, a country with a life expectancy of 83.8 years (exceeding the European average), ensuring active aging that preserves autonomy is a priority. The World Health Organization promotes a paradigm shift focused on "intrinsic capacity" and "functional ability," moving away from the traditional disease-centered approach to prioritize the preservation of functionality. Within this context, frailty stands out as a modifiable geriatric syndrome characterized by the decline of multiple physiological systems and associated with an increased risk of falls, hospitalization, and mortality. In Spain, frailty affects 18% of adults over 65 and up to 38% of those over 85, with marked sociodemographic disparities: it is more prevalent in women (who have a twofold risk compared to men) and in individuals with a lower socioeconomic status. Furthermore, its economic impact exceeds €2,500 per person annually. Multicomponent physical exercise is the most effective evidence-based strategy for reversing frailty. The Vivifrail program, internationally supported by scientific evidence, offers individualized protocols for this purpose. However, most studies have been conducted in controlled environments, leaving a gap in evidence regarding its real-world, home-based implementation prescribed from Primary Care, particularly in the province of Almería. This study aims to validate the effectiveness of Vivifrail in routine clinical practice, providing healthcare professionals with a low-cost, widely accessible tool. 2. Detailed Hypothesis and Objectives The hypothesis is that participation in the home-based Vivifrail multicomponent physical exercise program significantly improves functional capacity in pre-frail and frail older adults (aged 70 years and older). Secondary objectives include: To determine the program's impact on various geriatric syndromes and clinical variables of interest, such as chronic pain, appetite, fall risk, sarcopenia, mild cognitive impairment, sleep disturbances, depression, malnutrition, and urinary incontinence. To identify the clinical and sociodemographic profile of patients who are most likely to achieve a significant benefit from the intervention. 3. Study Design and Setting This is a quasi-experimental, pretest-posttest, non-randomized, single-arm interventional study. The study's execution, including participant recruitment and follow-up visits, will be centralized within the Primary Care setting, specifically at the Virgen del Mar Health Center in the province of Almería. 4. Sampling Strategy and Recruitment Participant recruitment will be conducted prospectively using non-probabilistic consecutive quota sampling by sex. To ensure the epidemiological representativeness of frailty, stratified quotas will be established: 66% women and 34% men. The selection process will follow these methodological stages: Identification: Generation of a target population list (≥70 years) through the electronic medical record (EMR) system (Diraya). Telephone Screening and Clinical Review: A member of the research team will make consecutive calls. Upon obtaining verbal consent, rapid screening scales will be administered. Concurrently, the EMR will be reviewed to ensure strict compliance with the selection criteria (verified during the eligibility phase). Bias Tracking: To ensure the control of selection bias, an anonymized database will be maintained to record the status of all contacted patients, including reasons for refusal to participate. 5. Detailed Description of the Intervention The intervention is based on the Vivifrail methodology and consists of a home-based, individualized, multicomponent physical exercise program. Its prescription will be managed by the second co-investigator and will last for a total of 12 weeks. Program Allocation: During the baseline visit, the participant's functional level will determine the prescribed "Vivifrail Passport". Passports used for pre-frail and frail patients will be Type B (frailty) and Type C (pre-frailty). If the assessment detects a high risk of falls, variants B+ or C+ will be assigned, which incorporate a higher volume of specific exercises for balance and fall prevention. Session Structure: Participants will complete five sessions per week. Three non-consecutive days: Multicomponent sessions lasting 45-60 minutes. These include a warm-up phase, strength exercises (using water bottles, elastic bands, or stress balls), static/dynamic balance training, joint flexibility, and a final cool-down/relaxation phase. Two days: Aerobic endurance exercise (brisk walking for 20 to 40 minutes). Progression and Intensity: Participants will be instructed to maintain a moderate rate of perceived exertion, corresponding to a score of 4-6 on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale. Starting in week 7, a systematic progression will be applied by increasing the load or duration of the exercises, following the Vivifrail Passport protocols. 6. Visit Schedule and Clinical Procedures The study includes three in-person assessment milestones at the health center, in addition to the home-based training: Baseline Visit (V1 - Week 0): Obtaining written informed consent, conducting the comprehensive baseline assessment, assigning the corresponding passport, delivering materials (including the Activity Diary), and providing technical training to the patient through practical demonstrations and safety guidelines. Intermediate Visit (V2 - Week 6): Clinical reassessment of dependent variables, review of the Activity Diary to audit adherence, troubleshooting technical issues, motivational reinforcement, and progressive adjustment of exercise intensity. Final Visit (V3 - Week 12): Evaluation of final post-intervention outcomes, final collection of the Activity Diary, closure of the adverse event log, and clinical feedback provided to the participant. 7. Adherence Monitoring and Safety Management Adherence will be triangulated using three methods: continuous self-reporting (an Activity Diary evaluating perceived exertion), attendance records for in-person visits, and proactive biweekly telephone follow-ups (weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12) conducted by the research team. "Adequate adherence" will be defined as the participant completing at least 80% of the planned home-based sessions. Regarding safety, patients will receive action protocols to contact their physician in the event of adverse events (dyspnea, falls, dizziness, or limiting pain). Active screening for incidents will be conducted during the biweekly follow-up calls. Severe adverse events will prompt immediate notification to the competent authorities and the Ethics Committee, potentially leading to the temporary or permanent suspension of the intervention for the affected individual. 8. Data Collection and Quality Control To ensure partial blinding and quality control, fieldwork will be functionally divided: the first co-investigator will perform the initial screening, while the second co-investigator will conduct the in-person measurements and adherence monitoring. Data collection will combine direct interviews with data extraction from the EMR (Diraya). Data will be consolidated into an Electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) where participants will be pseudonymized using a unique alphanumeric code (e.g., VVM-001). The database will be digitized in SPSS format and hosted on a secure server with restricted access, under the strict custody of the Principal Investigator. 9. Sample Size Justification Sample size was determined using G\*Power 3.1.92 statistical software. Based on prior literature regarding 12-week exercise interventions, a standardized effect size of 0.33 for functional capacity was estimated. Setting an alpha error of 0.05 (adjusted for multiple comparisons) and a statistical power of 80% (0.8), a theoretical need of 60 patients was calculated. Assuming a 30% attrition (dropout) rate, the final required sample size was set at 86 patients. 10. Statistical Analysis Plan Descriptive and inferential analyses will be performed using SPSS (v25.0) and R Statistical Software (v4.1.2) by statisticians from the Biomedical Research Unit of the Hospital Universitario Torrecárdenas. Descriptive statistics: Percentages for qualitative variables; means and standard deviations for quantitative variables. Normality testing: Shapiro-Wilk or Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests (p\>0.05) will be applied, depending on subgroup size. Hypothesis testing (Time course): To compare parameters between baseline and week 12, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test or paired Student's t-test will be used, depending on the distribution. To evaluate variance across the 3 time points (baseline, week 6, week 12), repeated measures ANOVA or the Friedman test will be utilized. Stratification: The evolution of variables according to sociodemographic profiles (e.g., sex) will be analyzed using a mixed factorial ANOVA or the Welch-James test for non-parametric scenarios. Correlations and Prediction: Pearson or Spearman coefficients will be used to assess the association between continuous variables. Finally, a multiple linear regression model will be executed to estimate the magnitude of functional improvement (percentage of change) by isolating the variance explained by the patients' different baseline and sociodemographic characteristics, thereby identifying the groups with the highest potential for benefit. 11. Methodological Limitations The protocol acknowledges several limitations inherent to its pragmatic feasibility. The pre-post design without a randomized control group prevents the complete isolation of the intervention's efficacy from potential confounding factors (changes in diet or medication), and the possible influence of the Hawthorne effect is assumed. Conducting the study in a single health center and relying on voluntary acceptance may introduce a selection bias toward patients predisposed to self-care, affecting external validity. The home-based nature of the training precludes continuous biomechanical supervision of exercise technique, which will be mitigated through periodic assessments. Furthermore, the 12-week timeframe will not allow for the evaluation of the long-term maintenance of clinical benefits after the protocol ends. 12. Practical Applicability, Dissemination, and Ethics The outcomes will have a three-tiered level of applicability: providing a better quality of life for patients, equipping primary care professionals with structured therapeutic tools, and promoting the optimization of healthcare resources by preventing institutionalization. The dissemination plan includes drafting scientific articles with a gender perspective (sex-disaggregated outcomes), participating in conferences (SEGG, semFYC, EUGMS), preparing an executive report for the Andalusian Health Service (SAS) management, conducting training workshops within the Health District, and holding direct informational sessions for the community. Technical execution and data custody will strictly adhere to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines, the Spanish Biomedical Research Law 14/2007, and the Organic Law 3/2018 on Personal Data Protection, ensuring the certified destruction of information 5 years after the study's conclusion. All research will be executed leveraging existing infrastructure, requiring no additional external funding.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
86
The Vivifrail multicomponent physical exercise program is a structured, 12-week home-based regimen. The standardized protocol requires 5 sessions per week: 3 non-consecutive days of 45-60 minute multicomponent training (focusing on upper and lower body strength using household items like water bottles or elastic bands, static/dynamic balance, and flexibility) and 2 days of 20-40 minute aerobic endurance training (brisk walking). Exercise intensity is prescribed at a moderate rate of perceived exertion (Borg scale 4-6). A systematic progression in exercise load and duration is implemented starting at week 7, strictly adhering to the guidelines of the participant's assigned passport.
Primary Care Center Virgen del Mar (Centro de Salud Virgen del Mar)
Almería, ALMERÍA, Spain
Change in Functional Capacity measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
The SPPB assesses physical performance and functional capacity through three sequential subtests: static balance (side-by-side, semi-tandem, and tandem stands for 10 seconds each), gait speed (time to walk 4 meters at a normal pace), and lower body strength (time to rise from a chair and sit down 5 consecutive times). The total SPPB score is calculated by summing the scores of the three subtests, yielding a final continuous score that ranges from 0 to 12. Clinical thresholds: A total score of \< 10 points indicates a high probability of frailty and an elevated risk of disability and falls. According to the Vivifrail classification, the scores categorize the patient's functional level as Disability (0-3 points), Frailty (4-6 points), Pre-frailty (7-9 points), or Robustness (10-12 points). A change of 1 point is considered clinically meaningful.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters (kg/m2). It is evaluated as a continuous quantitative measure to assess changes in the participant's body composition and nutritional status throughout the intervention.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12
Chronic Pain Intensity measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Chronic pain intensity is assessed using a 10-centimeter Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants mark a point on the line that best represents their current pain level. The score is measured in centimeters from the left end (0) to the participant's mark, yielding a score from 0 to 10. Direction of the scale: A score of 0 represents "no pain" (best outcome), while a score of 10 represents the "worst imaginable pain" (worst outcome). Clinical interpretation of the scores is categorized as follows: 0 = No pain; 1 to 3 = Mild pain; 4 to 6 = Moderate pain; 7 to 10 = Severe pain.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12
Appetite Perception measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Appetite perception is assessed using a 10-centimeter Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants mark a point on a continuous line that best reflects their current level of appetite. The score is measured in centimeters from the left anchor (0) to the participant's mark, resulting in a continuous score from 0 to 10. Direction of the scale: A score of 0 represents "no appetite" (worst outcome, indicating potential risk of malnutrition or anorexia of aging), while a score of 10 represents "maximum appetite" (best outcome). Clinical interpretation categorizes the scores as follows: 0 = No appetite; 1 to 3 = Mild appetite; 4 to 6 = Moderate appetite; 7 to 10 = Intense/strong appetite.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12
Proportion of Participants with High Fall Risk according to Vivifrail Criteria
Fall risk is evaluated as a dichotomous qualitative variable (High Risk vs. No High Risk) following the Vivifrail program protocol. A participant is classified as having a "High Fall Risk" if they meet one or more of the following five clinical criteria: 1) Two or more falls in the previous 12 months; 2) One fall in the previous 12 months requiring medical attention; 3) Timed Up and Go (TUG) test execution time \> 20 seconds; 4) 6-meter gait speed \< 0.8 m/s; or 5) A clinical diagnosis of dementia.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12
Functional Mobility measured by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test
The TUG test is a continuous quantitative measure that evaluates basic functional mobility. It records the time, in seconds, a participant takes to rise from an armchair (without using their arms), walk a distance of 3 meters at a normal pace, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down again. After an initial un-timed familiarization trial, the test is performed and timed twice, recording the best performance. Direction of the scale: A lower time in seconds indicates better functional mobility and a lower risk of falls. Clinically, a completion time of \> 20 seconds is interpreted as an elevated risk of falls.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12
Gait Speed (6-meter walk)
Gait speed is evaluated by measuring the time it takes the participant to walk a distance of 6 meters at a normal, comfortable pace. The result is calculated and recorded in meters per second (m/s) as a continuous quantitative variable. Direction of the scale: A higher value (faster speed) indicates better physical performance and mobility. Clinically, a gait speed of \< 0.8 m/s is considered a critical threshold indicative of frailty, sarcopenia, and an elevated risk of adverse outcomes, including falls.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12
Sarcopenia Risk assessed by the SARC-F Questionnaire
The SARC-F is a 5-item self-reported questionnaire designed to screen for sarcopenia risk. It evaluates five domains: Strength (difficulty lifting/carrying 4.5 kg), Assistance with walking (difficulty walking across a room), Rising from a chair (difficulty transferring from a chair or bed), Climbing stairs (difficulty climbing a flight of 10 stairs), and Falls (number of falls in the past year). Each item is scored from 0 (no difficulty / no falls) to 2 (severe difficulty / 4 or more falls). The total score is the sum of the 5 items, yielding a continuous range from 0 to 10. Direction of the scale: A score of 0 represents the best outcome (no signs of sarcopenia), while a score of 10 represents the worst outcome (severe sarcopenia and functional limitation). Clinical interpretation: The result is also evaluated as a dichotomous qualitative variable (Presence/Absence of sarcopenia), where a total score \> 4 defines the clinical presence of sarcopenia.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12
Cognitive Function assessed by the Fototest
The Fototest is a brief cognitive screening instrument validated for the Spanish population, specifically designed to minimize educational and literacy biases in older adults. It evaluates three cognitive domains using a sheet with six photographs of everyday objects: 1) Naming the objects (0 to 6 points); 2) Verbal fluency, naming as many proper names as possible in 30 seconds (0 to 12 points); and 3) Delayed recall of the objects after a brief interference task (0 to 17 points). The total score is calculated by summing the three phases, resulting in a continuous range from 0 to 35 points. Direction of the scale: A score of 0 represents the worst outcome (severe cognitive impairment), while a score of 35 represents the best outcome (optimal cognitive function). Clinical interpretation: The result is also evaluated as an ordinal qualitative variable categorized into three clinical ranges: Normal cognitive function (≥ 29 points), Suspected Mild Cognitive Impairment (26 to 28 points)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12
Sleep Quality assessed by the Oviedo Sleep Questionnaire (OSQ)
The Oviedo Sleep Questionnaire evaluates subjective sleep quality and sleep disturbances over the previous month. This brief scale consists of 6 items assessing different sleep dimensions: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, number of nocturnal awakenings, total sleep duration, sleep restfulness, and daytime sleepiness. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (worst condition) to 5 (best condition). The total score is calculated by summing the 6 items, resulting in a continuous range from 6 to 30 points. Direction of the scale: A score of 6 represents the worst possible outcome (severe sleep disturbances or insomnia/hypersomnia), while a score of 30 represents the best possible outcome (optimal sleep quality). Clinical interpretation: The continuous score is also categorized into an ordinal qualitative variable with three clinical ranges: Normal sleep (≥ 26 points), Mild sleep alteration (21 to 25 points), and Significant sleep alteration (≤ 20 points).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12
Depressive Symptoms assessed by the Geriatric Depression Scale - Short Form (GDS-15)
The GDS-15 is a 15-item self-report questionnaire specifically designed to screen for depression in older adults. Participants answer "Yes" or "No" to questions regarding how they felt over the past week. Responses indicative of depressive symptoms (e.g., answering "No" to feeling satisfied with life, or "Yes" to feeling life is empty) are assigned 1 point, while non-depressive responses receive 0 points. The total score is calculated by summing the points from all 15 items, resulting in a continuous range from 0 to 15 points. Direction of the scale: A score of 0 represents the best possible outcome (absence of depressive symptoms), while a score of 15 represents the worst outcome (severe depressive symptoms). Clinical interpretation: The continuous score is also categorized into an ordinal qualitative variable with three clinical ranges: Normal / No depression (0 to 5 points), Mild depression (6 to 9 points), and Established depression (10 to 15 points).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12
Nutritional Status assessed by the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF)
The MNA-SF is a validated 6-item screening tool designed to identify older adults who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition. It evaluates six domains over the previous 3 months: decline in food intake, weight loss, mobility, psychological stress or acute disease, neuropsychological problems, and Body Mass Index (BMI) or calf circumference. Each item is scored from 0 to a maximum of 3 points. The total score is calculated by summing the items, resulting in a continuous range from 0 to 14 points. Direction of the scale: A score of 0 represents the worst possible outcome (severe malnutrition), while a score of 14 represents the best possible outcome (normal, optimal nutritional status). Clinical interpretation: The continuous score is also categorized into an ordinal qualitative variable with three clinical ranges: Normal nutritional status (12 to 14 points), At risk of malnutrition (8 to 11 points), and Malnourished (0 to 7 points).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12
Urinary Continence assessed by the specific item of the Barthel Index
Urinary continence over the previous week is evaluated using the specific urination/bladder item from the Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living. This ordinal qualitative variable assesses the frequency of incontinence episodes and assigns a specific score based on three categories. Scoring criteria: 10 points = Continent (no episodes of incontinence); 5 points = Occasional (maximum of 1 episode per 24 hours, or requires assistance with catheter care); 0 points = Incontinent. Direction of the scale: A score of 0 represents the worst possible outcome (total incontinence), while a score of 10 represents the best possible outcome (complete continence).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.