The intrauterine device (IUD) is a reversible contraceptive method with good efficacy and long-lasting action. One of the obstacles to IUD insertion, both for healthcare professionals and patients, is the fear of painful insertion. There is little data in the literature on the pain experienced by patients, and even less in relation to their parity. Several studies have been conducted and show that nulliparous women seemed to experience more intense pain compared to multiparous women (2.7 vs 1.9 p\<0.05)
The hypotheses of this study are: * Pain is more intense in nulliparous women than in multiparous women. * Nulliparous women are more anxious before IUD insertion than multiparous women. * Satisfaction rates at 6 and 12 months do not differ according to parity. Pain will be assessed at each stage of IUD insertion using a numerical pain scale from 0 to 10 for speculum insertion, Pozzi forceps insertion, and IUD insertion, by the patient herself. Pain will be reassessed 5 minutes after insertion, also by the patient. Patients' anxiety levels will be assessed before insertion using the Spielberger State Anxiety Scale. This is a self-administered questionnaire comprising 20 items. This is a 4-point Likert scale assessing the intensity of the subject's feelings ("no," "somewhat no," "somewhat yes," "yes"). The satisfaction rate will be assessed by telephone questionnaire at 6 and 12 months, allowing us to evaluate the continuation rate as well as potential side effects of this method of contraception, such as amenorrhea, spotting, headaches, or mastalgia. Based on the results, the aim of this study is to propose appropriate pain management and information to reduce any anxiety and reassure patients about their satisfaction with this method of contraception.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
162
University Rouen Hospital
Rouen, France
The main objective of the study is to assess whether there is a significant difference between the pain experienced by nulliparous and multiparous women during the insertion of an intrauterine device.
The primary evaluation criterion is the pain experienced at each stage of IUD insertion. This will be assessed using a numerical pain scale from 0 to 10 during the insertion of the speculum, Pozzi forceps, and intrauterine device, by the patient immediately after insertion. Pain 5 minutes after insertion is also assessed using the same method.
Time frame: Day 1
Evaluate the criteria motivating the choice of intrauterine device contraception in multiparous patients.
The criteria motivating the choice of IUD contraception will be assessed using a closed-ended question containing 10 items, with multiple possible answers.
Time frame: 1 day
Evaluate the criteria motivating the choice of intrauterine device contraception in nulliparous patients.
The criteria motivating the choice of IUD contraception will be assessed using a closed-ended question containing 10 items, with multiple possible answers.
Time frame: 1 day
Assessing the stress generated by the insertion of an intrauterine device
The patient's anxiety level will be assessed before the procedure using the Spielberger State Anxiety Scale. This self-administered questionnaire comprises 20 items. It uses a 4-point Likert scale to evaluate the intensity of the subject's feelings ("no," "somewhat no," "somewhat yes," "yes"). Each response to an item is scored from 1 to 4, with 1 indicating the lowest level of anxiety and 4 the highest. The score is calculated by summing the scores obtained for each item. The score can therefore range from 20 to 80.
Time frame: 1 day
Evaluation of the rate of continued use at 6 months, then at 1 year during follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The satisfaction rate will be assessed by a telephone questionnaire at 6 and 12 months, allowing for an evaluation of the continuation rate. This involves measuring the percentage of women who are still using the contraceptive system at 6 and 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
Evaluation of the side effects caused by this method of contraception during follow-up.
les potentiels effets secondaires engendrés par ce mode de contraception comme l'aménorrhée, la survenue de spotting, de céphalées, ou encore de mastodynie seront évalués par un questionnaire téléphonique à 6 mois et 12mois
Time frame: 12 months