The study aimed to evaluate the effect of Hyaluronic Acid-based gel use in addition to the coronally advanced flap (CAF) technique in type 1 gingival recession (RT1) on postoperative morbidity, clinical parameters, and patient satisfaction, analyzed at baseline and 6 months.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of HA use in addition to the coronally advanced flap (CAF) technique in type 1 gingival recession (RT1) on postoperative morbidity, clinical parameters, and patient satisfaction, analyzed at baseline and 6 months. This split-mouth study included 20 patients (9 males, 11 females) with a mean age of 42.10±9.46 years who were diagnosed with bilateral RT1 gingival recession in the maxilla. The right and left defect areas of the 20 patients were randomly assigned to two groups. The control group received CAF (n=20), and the test group received CAF+HA (n=20). Pre-treatment plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), vertical recession depth (VRD), horizontal recession width (HRW), gingival thickness (GT), attached gingival (AG), and keratinized gingival width (KGW) were recorded. Additionally, a satisfaction analysis was conducted, including patient-based comfort (PBC), aesthetic (PEA), and sensitivity (PHS) scores. During the operation, a 0.8% HA gel was applied to the defect areas in the test group, in addition to CAF, while saline was applied to the control group, also in addition to CAF. Pain, bleeding, and edema scores, as well as the amount of painkillers, were recorded during the 9-day postoperative period. Clinical parameter measurements and patient satisfaction analyses were repeated 6 months after surgical treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
20
0.8% hyaluronic acid gel (Gengigel Oral Forte Gel, Ricefarma, Milan, Italy)
Mix 8 teaspoons of salt into 4 L of distilled water
Figen Öngöz Dede
Ordu, Turkey (Türkiye)
Complete root coverage
for evaluating rate of complete root coverage
Time frame: 6 months postsurgery
Mean root coverage
for evaluating rate of mean root coverage
Time frame: 6 months postsurgery
Plaque Index
to assess plaque accumulation
Time frame: Baseline
Plaque Index
to assess plaque accumulation
Time frame: 6 months post surgery
Gingival Index
for evaluating gingival inflammation
Time frame: Baseline
Gingival index
for evaluating gingival inflammation
Time frame: 6 montsh post surgery
Probing pocket depth
for measuring disease severity
Time frame: Baseline
Probing pocket depth
for measuring disease severity
Time frame: 6 months post surgery
Clinical attachment level
Clinical attachment level (CAL) is calculated by adding or subtracting probing depth (PD) and gingival recession (GR). The formula is CAL = PD + GR. CAL is measured in millimeters.
Time frame: Baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Clinical attachment level
Clinical attachment level (CAL) is calculated by adding or subtracting probing depth (PD) and gingival recession (GR). The formula is CAL = PD + GR. CAL is measured in millimeters.
Time frame: 6 months post surgery
Vertical recession depth
for evaluating gingival recession depth
Time frame: Baseline
Vertical recession depth
for evaluating gingival recession depth
Time frame: 6 months postsurgery
Horizontal gingival recession
for evaluating gingival recession depth
Time frame: Baseline
Horizontal gingival recession
for evaluating gingival recession depth
Time frame: 6 months postsurgery
Attached gingival width
for evaluating attached gingival width
Time frame: Baseline
Attached gingival width
for evaluating attached gingival width
Time frame: 6 months postsurgery
Keratinized gingival width
for evaluating keratinized gingival width
Time frame: Baseline
Keratinized gingival width
for evaluating keratinized gingival width
Time frame: 6 months postsurgery
Gingival thickness
for evaluating gingival thickness
Time frame: Baseline
Gingival thickness
for evaluating gingival thickness
Time frame: 6 months postsurgery
Patient comfort score
Patient satisfaction was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). "unbearable discomfort (score 0)" to "no discomfort (score 10)".
Time frame: Baseline
Patient comfort score
Patient satisfaction was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). "unbearable discomfort (score 0)" to "no discomfort (score 10)".
Time frame: 6 months postsurgery
Patient aesthetic score
Poor-unexpected aesthetics (score 0) → beautiful-perfect aesthetics (score 10) using VAS scale
Time frame: Baseline
Patient aesthetic score
Poor-unexpected aesthetics (score 0) → beautiful-perfect aesthetics (score 10) using VAS scale
Time frame: 6 months post surgery
Patient sensitivity score
painless-discomfort no (score 0) → unbearable pain (score 10) using VAS scale
Time frame: Baseline
Patient sensitivity score
painless-discomfort no (score 0) → unbearable pain (score 10) using VAS scale
Time frame: 6 months postsurgery