This study will test how well an artificial intelligence (AI) software called Aorta AIM measures the size of the aorta (the body's main blood vessel) from CT scans. The aorta can become enlarged over time, which may lead to serious health problems. Doctors need to measure the aorta accurately to monitor patients and decide on treatment. Currently, doctors measure the aorta manually on CT scans, which takes time and can vary between different doctors. Aorta AIM is designed to measure the aorta automatically and consistently. In this study, researchers will compare Aorta AIM's measurements to those made by experienced radiologists or cardiologists (doctors who specialize in reading medical images). The study will use CT scans that have already been taken as part of routine medical care - no additional scans or procedures are needed. The study will include approximately 250 participants across multiple hospitals in Brazil and the United States. Participants will be adults who have had a chest or abdominal CT scan that shows their aorta. The main goals are to: * Check if Aorta AIM measures the aorta as accurately as radiologists * See if Aorta AIM can help doctors work more efficiently * Evaluate if the software works well in different hospital settings and with different types of patients This research may help improve how doctors monitor aortic disease and make treatment decisions in the future. There are no risks to participants since the study only uses existing medical images.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
250
Aorta AIM is an investigational artificial intelligence software that automatically measures aortic diameters from CT imaging. The software analyzes retrospectively collected CT scans and generates standardized aortic diameter measurements at anatomically defined locations. These automated measurements will be compared to manual measurements performed by expert radiologists.
Manual aortic diameter measurements performed independently by two board-certified or equivalently experienced radiologists (minimum 5 years of cardiovascular imaging experience), each blinded to the other's measurements. Where the difference between the two reads does not exceed 3mm, the mean serves as the ground truth. Where the difference exceeds 3mm, a third senior reader performs independent adjudication, blinded to both primary reads. These consensus measurements serve as the reference standard for validation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGInnovation Health Services
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
RECRUITINGHospital Israelita Albert Einstein
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGMean Absolute Error (MAE) between Aorta AIM measurements and expert reference standard
Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between aortic diameter measurements generated by Aorta AIM version 1.0 and the reference standard established by board-certified or equivalently experienced radiologists and/or cardiologists. Reference standard established through dual independent blinded reads with adjudication by a third senior reader where required. MAE will be calculated across all anatomical regions of the aorta assessed in the study. Acceptance criterion: MAE ≤ 5.0mm
Time frame: At time of CT scan analysis (single time point, retrospective data collection from studies performed January 1, 2016 through August 31, 2025)
Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement
Bland-Altman analysis to determine the limits of agreement between Aorta AIM automated measurements and expert manual measurements, providing assessment of systematic bias and random variation between the two measurement methods established through dual independent blinded reads with adjudication
Time frame: At time of CT scan analysis (single time point, retrospective data collection from studies performed January 1, 2016 through August 31, 2025)
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient assessing the reliability and agreement between Aorta AIM automated measurements and expert manual measurements across all anatomical regions of the aorta established through dual independent blinded reads with adjudication
Time frame: At time of CT scan analysis (single time point, retrospective data collection from studies performed January 1, 2016 through August 31, 2025)
Yield
Proportion of cases with valid ground truth for which Aorta AIM produces evaluable measurements at all predefined anatomical landmarks
Time frame: At time of CT scan analysis (single time point, retrospective data collection from studies performed January 1, 2016 through August 31, 2025)
Processing time
Time required for Aorta AIM software to process CT scans and generate automated aortic diameter measurements, measured in seconds or minutes from image input to final measurement output.
Time frame: At time of CT scan analysis (single time point, retrospective data collection from studies performed January 1, 2016 through August 31, 2025)
Qualitative clinical acceptability scores by expert readers
Expert radiologist assessment of the clinical acceptability of Aorta AIM automated measurements using standardized scoring criteria. Readers will evaluate whether automated measurements are suitable for clinical decision-making purposes. Clinical Acceptability Scale (0-2): 0 = Not Acceptable, 1 = Acceptable, 2 = Perfect. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Time frame: At time of CT scan analysis (single time point, retrospective data collection from studies performed January 1, 2016 through August 31, 2025)
Scott Flamm, MD
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.