The neurobiological basis of central fatigue in multiple sclerosis remained unclear so far. This study investigates reward-related brain mechanisms, inflammation, and their modulation by non-invasive brain stimulation using fMRI, proteomics, and clinical measures to improve future treatment of central fatigue in MS. In the study, persons suffering from relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) with vs. without comorbid central fatigue will be included. The study comprises five experimental visits conducted at Charité University Medicine on five consecutive days (i.e., V1 - V5) and two follow-up visits two (V6) and four (V7) weeks after V5. True or sham anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) at the five visits V1 to V5. All primary and secondary outcomes are assessed at V1 and V5. At V6 and V7, measures of central fatigue are additionally assessed via questionnaires which are send to and back from the patients via mail. Participants of all groups will participate in all visits.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
84
Transcranial direct current stimulation over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 20 min daily over 5 consecutive days at 1200 uA
Sham Stimulation of the dlPFC via tDCS device for 20 minutes on 5 consecutive days
Charité Campus Mitte
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
RECRUITINGCentral fatigue
Assessed with cognitive subscale of with Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC): Minimum 20 points, maximum 100 points, higher values denoting worse outcome
Time frame: At enrolment and 4 days, two weeks and four weeks after enrolment
Neurobehavioral markers of effort discounting
Measured in a functional MRI (fMRI) task
Time frame: At enrolment and 4 days after enrolment
Neurobehavioral markers of habit formation
Measured in an fMRI task
Time frame: At enrolment and 4 days after enrolment
White matter integrity MRI measure
Computed as voxel-wise quotients of T1-weighted and T2-weigted anatomical MRI brain scan parameters
Time frame: At enrolment and 4 days after enrolment
Brain age marker
Inferred via machine learning from anatomical T1-weighted brain scan
Time frame: At enrolment and 4 days after enrolment
Whole-brain grey matter fraction
Inferred from anatomical T1-weighted brain MRI scans
Time frame: At enrolment and 4 days after enrolment
Whole-brain volume of focal brain lesions
Inferred from anatomical T2-weighted brain MRI scans
Time frame: At enrolment and 4 days after enrolment
Change in concentration of inflammatory markers
124 blood-derived inflammatory cytokine and chemokine markers determined via an inflammatory panel
Time frame: At enrolment and 4 days after enrolment
Change in cognitive performance
Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS)
Time frame: At enrolment and 4 days after enrolment
Complementary fatigue markers
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Minimum value 7, Maximum value 63, higher score denoting a worse outcome.
Time frame: At enrolment, and 4 days, two and four weeks after enrolment
Severity of depressive symptoms
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Minimum value 0, Maximum value 63, higher values denoting worse outcome
Time frame: At enrolment and 4 days after enrolment
Sleep quality
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Minimum Score 0, Maximum Score 21, higher score denoting worse outcome
Time frame: At enrolment and 4 days after enrolment
Severity of anxiety symptoms
Measured on the State-Trait Anxiety index-I (STAI-I), minimum score 20, maximum score 80, higher score denoting worse outcome
Time frame: At enrolment and 4 days after enrolment
Change in Fatigue severity
Visual analogue scale of fatigue (VAS-F), minimum value 1, maximum value 10, higher score denoting worse outcome
Time frame: At enrolment, and 1,2,3,4 days, two and four weeks after enrolment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.