This randomized, double-blinded volunteer study compares two ways of performing the adductor canal (AC) nerve block at the mid-thigh to see which approach more reliably numbs the anteromedial knee. One approach is the traditional AC block placed near the saphenous nerve; the other separately targets the nerve to vastus medialis (NVM) in addition to the saphenous nerve. Healthy adult participants receive both blocks in one visit (one on each leg), with the order randomized. The primary outcome is change in quadriceps strength (a proxy for vastus medialis anesthesia) measured by load-cell dynamometry. Secondary outcomes include cutaneous sensory mapping (pinprick and cold) and the percentage of a standardized, marked knee-incision line covered by sensory block. The study uses ultrasound guidance and a standard dose of chloroprocaine, with routine monitoring to minimize risks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
25
Ultrasound-guided injection adjacent to the saphenous nerve; 20 mL of 2% chloroprocaine.
Ultrasound-guided injection; 10 mL 2% chloroprocaine at the NVM (confirmed by nerve stimulation), plus 10 mL at the saphenous nerve.
2% chloroprocaine
Quadriceps strength as measured by load cell dynamometer
Load cell dynamometers are highly accurate portable electronic devices used to measure isometric muscle strength.
Time frame: Day 1
Percentage of hypothetical incision covered
An unblinded anesthesiologist will mark the mock total knee arthroplasty and the length of the hypothetical incision that has diminished sensation to pinprick will be determined.
Time frame: Day 1
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.