Chronic temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) affect the masticatory muscles, the temporomandibular joints (TMJs), and associated structures. Except in cases of trauma, their etiology remains uncertain, debated, and multifactorial. Conservative therapies-including no active intervention-often alleviate symptoms; however, approximately 3% of the population develops persistent forms associated with substantial individual suffering and significant social and economic burden. At the Unit of Occlusion and Prosthodontics of the University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Physiologically Oriented Occlusal Equilibration (POOE) has been used for chronic painful TMDs since 1985. POOE aims to correct unilateral mastication patterns and to establish appropriate non-working side contacts in order to protect the temporomandibular joints from mechanical overload. Singh (Cochrane, 2024) emphasized that occlusal interventions should be evaluated with long-term follow-up of at least 3-5 years. This is a single-blind study: the evaluator remains blinded to treatment allocation during outcome assessment. The aim of this observational study is to assess the long-term effectiveness of POOE treatments for chronic TMDs from 1985 to the present. Treatment effectiveness will be confirmed if the reduction in pain achieved with POOE is statistically significant and clinically meaningful (≥1.5/10 on a 0-10 visual analog scale) compared with sham therapy at ≥3 years post-intervention relative to baseline. Additionally, effectiveness will be supported if the proportion of individuals meeting criteria for chronic TMD ("affected") is lower in the POOE-treated group than in those receiving alternative therapies.
Chronic TMDs constitute a complex syndrome that is currently understood as comprising more than 30 distinct nosological entities. The underlying cause of their pathophysiology has not been fully elucidated. Consequently, treatments are typically empirical and applied simultaneously, including pharmacotherapy, counseling, physiotherapy, occlusal splints (perhaps the most widely used), physical modalities, and other minimally invasive procedures such as arthrocentesis or arthroscopy, extending even to total TMJ replacement. None of these interventions has demonstrated superior efficacy compared with placebo or no treatment. Globally, these patients often consult multiple specialists and undergo numerous treatment modalities, with an unpredictable prognosis. Physiologically oriented occlusal equilibration (POOE) was shown to be more effective than placebo at 6 months post-treatment. The 2024 Cochrane review indicated that assessing the efficacy of occlusal therapies requires evaluation at least 3 to 5 years after treatment. The treatments performed at USC since 1985 for chronic TMDs represent a valuable source of long-term clinical experience that may clarify whether POOE remains effective many years after treatment (from 1985 to the present), rather than only at 6 months. Scientific Objectives To evaluate the effect of occlusal adjustment on pain intensity in patients with chronic TMDs during long-term follow-up over several years. To disseminate the findings-whether positive, negative, or inconclusive-in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Methods This is an observational study, as no intervention will be applied to participants. It will be open-label or single-blind (outcome assessors will be blinded to the treatment previously received, but participants will not be). The study is cross-sectional, as it will be conducted at a single time point and in a single visit. The study will consist of diagnosing any current TMDs potentially affecting individuals who were previously treated at USC for chronic TMDs. All participating individuals are familiar with the diagnostic procedures, which include extra- and intraoral examination, dynamic recording of mandibular and condylar movements, and the tests recommended in the DC/TMD criteria. If the participant provides authorization, clinically relevant information from their medical record regarding TMD history will be used to determine the degree of improvement or deterioration relative to the pretreatment baseline.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
110
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
RECRUITINGUrbano Santana Penín
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATIONGroup differences in change in pain intensity at 10 years follow-up in respect pretreatment scores.
Differences between POOE and sham terapy groups in mean change in pain intensity at 10 years folloow-up, in respect pretreatment scores using VAS scale 0(no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) . Greater differences indicate a better outcome.
Time frame: Pretreatment, and 10 years follow-up
Group differences in the change in maximum unassisted mouth opening
Distance between incissors during jaw opening using 0 to 60 mm TheraBite® range of motion scale™
Time frame: pretreatment, 10 years follow-up
Odds of "success" in pain reduction of POOE compared with sham therapy
"Success" was defined as a decrease in pain scores ≥ 2 points while decreases \<2 points, as well as unmodified or increased pain scores were labeled as "failure". We also carried out an additional analysis in which we focused on strong effects of the treatment. In this additional analysis, we redefined success as a decrease in pain ≥ 4 points, and any other effect as "failure". It will be adjusted for third covariables in order to remove any confounding bias.
Time frame: Pretreatmen, 10 years follow-up
Psychological distress (GSI from SCL-90-R test)
SCL-90-R. Higher scores indicate greater psychological distress. The Global Severity Index (GSI) of the SCL-90-R ranges from 0 to 4. This index represents the mean score of all 90 items, each rated on a 0-4 Likert scale (0 = not at all, 4 = extremely). Thus, GSI values can vary between 0, indicating no symptoms, and 4, indicating maximum symptom severity.
Time frame: Pretreatment, 10 years follow-up
Change in condylar path angles
Condylar path angles are meassured between the Franckfort horizontal plane and the condylar path recprdings
Time frame: Pretreatment, 10 years follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.