COPD: A Leading Cause of Respiratory Disability COPD, primarily linked to smoking, affects 3.5 million people in France and causes 15,000 deaths each year. It is a major source of disability, particularly due to dyspnoea, which affects one in three patients. Around 400,000 patients are registered under long-term conditions (ALD), and 200,000 receive home-based respiratory support. The most severe cases fall under the category of chronic respiratory failure-a term also applicable to other respiratory or neuromuscular diseases. Walking Exposes Physical Limitations In patients with respiratory failure, walking rapidly induces disabling dyspnoea, as it may represent their maximal effort. This severely limits autonomy and quality of life. To improve exercise tolerance, clinicians rely on pulmonary rehabilitation (exercise reconditioning, bronchodilators, oxygen therapy). When these measures are insufficient, mobility aids such as scooters or electric scooters may help, although they have limitations (cost, bulkiness, muscular deconditioning). The Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT): A Key Tool The 6MWT is a standardised test that assesses walking distance, dyspnoea, heart rate, and oxygenation. It is used to evaluate the severity and prognosis of respiratory failure and to measure response to treatment. It is integrated into prognostic indices and criteria for assessing the effectiveness of rehabilitation. The only non-standardised parameter remains the type of footwear worn. Research Hypothesis Some so-called "active" sports shoes enhance walking by design-through cushioning, rocker soles, and rigid inserts-which store and return impact energy to assist propulsion. We hypothesise that wearing such shoes could improve walking performance in COPD patients, as reflected by a greater distance on the 6MWT. If confirmed, this simple and low-cost solution could meaningfully improve the daily lives of many patients.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of respiratory disability and impaired quality of life, particularly due to exertional dyspnoea. In patients with moderate to severe disease, walking can trigger disabling breathlessness, effectively limiting autonomy and social participation. While pulmonary rehabilitation, pharmacological treatments, and oxygen therapy can improve exercise tolerance, some patients continue to experience debilitating limitations. Mobility aids such as scooters are sometimes proposed but carry risks of deconditioning and are not always practical or accessible. The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is a standardised and widely used measure of submaximal functional capacity in COPD. It provides prognostic and therapeutic insights, but one parameter remains non-standardised: the type of footwear used by patients during the test. This study explores the hypothesis that biomechanically optimised "active" sports shoes-designed to enhance gait efficiency through energy-returning cushioning, curved ("rocker") soles, and stiff inserts-may significantly improve walking performance in individuals with COPD. ChaussePnée is a randomised, open-label, controlled, cross-over trial comparing two walking conditions in the same patient: wearing "active" sports shoes versus their usual, "normal" shoes. The primary objective is to detect a difference in walking distance during the 6MWT between the two conditions. Secondary objectives include assessments of symptom tolerance (dyspnoea, leg fatigue), physiological responses (heart rate, oxygen saturation), perceived comfort, and biomechanical efficiency during walking and stair climbing. Patients will be recruited during hospitalisation in a respiratory rehabilitation unit. Eligible participants will be adults with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD, with severe to very severe airflow obstruction (FEV1 \< 50% predicted), and dyspnoea classified as grade 3 or 4 on the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale. All participants will have a clinical indication for 6MWT as part of their care. Each participant will undergo two 6MWTs and two stair climbing tests on the same day, at a dedicated clinical investigation centre. The sequence of shoe conditions will be randomised. Between tests, sufficient rest periods will be ensured. Standardised instructions and outcome measures (including distance, Borg scales, comfort ratings, vital signs, and optional metabolic measurements) will be used. An ancillary study, offered to a subset of participants, will include continuous spirometric and metabolic assessments during the tests, aiming to clarify underlying physiological mechanisms (e.g., energy expenditure, hyperventilation, dynamic hyperinflation). Motion capture and force platform analysis will quantify gait biomechanics. In-shoe pressure mapping will compare load distribution across footwear conditions. The study plans to enrol 75 patients. Sample size was calculated based on a minimal clinically important difference of 22.8 metres in 6MWT distance, assuming an SD of 53.6m and a power of 80-90%. The main analysis will compare intra-individual differences in 6MWT distance using paired statistical tests and linear mixed models accounting for period and sequence effects. Secondary outcomes will be analysed similarly. The study duration is 12 months, with a single study visit for each participant. Risks are minimal, as all procedures are non-invasive and part of standard respiratory evaluation. Participants will travel to the evaluation centre by covered medical transport, and no medication or biological sampling is involved. The anticipated benefit is both individual (raising awareness of the role of footwear in daily life) and collective (identifying a simple, low-cost intervention to support mobility in COPD).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
75
Biomechanically optimised footwear featuring high energy-return cushioning, rocker sole geometry, and rigid inserts, worn during walking and stair-climbing tests to assess impact on physical performance in COPD patients.
The patient's own everyday footwear, worn during walking and stair-climbing tests, serving as a control condition to compare with biomechanically optimised sports shoes.
Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital - Department of pneumology
Paris, France
Distance walked during the six-minute walk test (6MWT)
Comparison of walking distance (in metres) between two conditions-wearing active sports shoes versus usual shoes-measured in the same patient using standardised six-minute walk tests.
Time frame: Within one day (two tests performed on the same day)
Completion and performance of a stair-climbing test
Assessment of the ability to complete one flight of stairs and related performance metrics (time taken, number of steps, need to pause), comparing the active shoes versus usual shoes condition in the same patient.
Time frame: Within one day (two tests performed on the same day)
Change in dyspnoea intensity (Borg scale)
Dyspnoea intensity will be assessed using the modified Borg Category-Ratio 10 (CR10) scale (range 0-10), where 0 will indicate "no breathlessness at all" and 10 will indicate "maximal breathlessness." Higher scores will reflect greater dyspnoea severity. Change in dyspnoea intensity will be calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline scores (post minus baseline), with negative values indicating an improvement (reduction) in dyspnoea.
Time frame: Within one day (start and end of each 6MWT and stair test)
Change in lower limb fatigue (Borg scale)
Fatigue intensity will be assessed using the modified Borg Category-Ratio 10 (CR10) scale (range 0-10), where 0 will indicate "no fatigue at all" and 10 will indicate "maximal fatigue." Higher scores will reflect greater fatigue severity. Change in fatigue intensity will be calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline scores (post minus baseline), with negative values indicating an improvement (reduction) in fatigue.
Time frame: Within one day (end of each 6MWT and stair test)
Change in foot pain (Borg scale)
Pain in the feet will be assessed using the modified Borg Category-Ratio 10 (CR10) scale (range 0-10), where 0 will indicate "no pain at all" and 10 will indicate "maximal pain." Higher scores will reflect greater pain severity. Change in foot pain intensity will be calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline scores (post minus baseline), with negative values indicating an improvement (reduction) in pain.
Time frame: Within one day (end of each 6MWT and stair test)
Comfort rating of the shoes
Perceived comfort of the shoes, scored on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (0 = extremely uncomfortable, 10 = extremely comfortable), comparing active versus usual shoes.
Time frame: Within one day (end of each 6MWT and stair test)
Comfort rating of the shoes
Short version of patient questionnaire of "confort rating of the shoes", comparing active versus usual shoes.
Time frame: Within one day (end of each 6MWT )
Change in heart rate
Variation in heart rate from start to end of each test, measured via pulse oximetry, comparing active versus usual shoes.
Time frame: Within one day (start and end of each 6MWT and stair test)
Change in oxygen saturation (SpO₂)
Variation in oxygen saturation measured non-invasively before and after each test, comparing active versus usual shoes.
Time frame: Within one day (start and end of each 6MWT and stair test)
Change in breathing frequency
Variation in breathing frequency from start to end of each test, comparing active versus usual shoes.
Time frame: Within one day (start and end of each 6MWT and stair test)
Biomechanical gait parameters
Kinematic analysis of gait using motion capture
Time frame: Within one day (during the walking tests)
Thoracic respiratory parameters
Kinematics of breathing using motion capture
Time frame: Within one day (during the walking tests)
Foot pressure distribution
Plantar pressure mapping collected with in-shoe sensors during brief standing and walking periods, comparing pressure distribution between active and usual shoes.
Time frame: Within one day (static and walking trials)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.