The goal of this observational study is to investigate the early sensory system in clinical high risk (CHR), first episode psychosis (FEP) individuals and heathly controls. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can anomalies in visual and auditory sensory processing serve as early markers of psychosis risk? * How are these sensory anomalies related to clinical symptom severity and emotional recognition deficits? Researchers will compare CHR and PEP participants to healthy controls to see if sensory processing differences can help identify individuals at higher risk of developing psychosis. Participants will: * Complete behavioral tasks evaluating visual processing (contrast sensitivity, contour integration, facial emotion recognition, visual inference using Necker cubes) and auditory processing (tone-matching, auditory emotion recognition). A temporal perception component will also be assessed within the auditory and emotion recognition tasks, rather than as a separate task. * Undergo electrophysiological assessments of retinal function using flash stimulation to record retinal potentials (a-wave, b-wave, phNR, oscillatory potentials). * Provide demographic, clinical, and neuropsychological data during study visits. * For CHR participants, attend follow-up visits up to 6 months post initial assessments to evaluate psychotic symptom progression.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
294
All participants will undergo behavioral assessments of visual and auditory processing, including contrast sensitivity, facial emotion recognition, visual inference using Necker cubes, tone-matching, and auditory emotion recognition.
Participants will additionally undergo electrophysiological recordings of retinal function (a-wave, b-wave, phNR, oscillatory potentials) using flash stimulation.
All participants will be assessed using the CAARMS in order to evaluate their symptoms and classify them into either the CHR or FEP group
TAP attention and working memory test, fNART, VOSP, Verbal fluency test.
Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier
Bron, France
Centre Psychothérapique de Nancy
Laxou, France
Centre Hospitalier Alpes-Isère
Saint-Égrève, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
Contrast sensitivity task
computerized contrast detection task
Time frame: Day 1 for healthy controls, Day 1-30 for patients
Facial emotion recognition task
computerized emotion recognition task
Time frame: Day 1 for healthy controls, Day 1-30 for patients
Visual inference task
Computerized visual inference task
Time frame: Day 1 for healthy controls, Day 1-30 for patients
Tone matching task
Computerized tone matching task
Time frame: Day 1 for healthy controls, Day 1-30 for patients
Auditory emotion recognition task
Computerized emotion recognition task
Time frame: Day 1 for healthy controls, Day 1-30 for patients
ERG measure
amplitude and latency of the b-wave, a-wave, PhNR and oscillatory potentials
Time frame: Day 1 for healthy controls, Day 1-30 for patients
CAARMS assessment
Time frame: Day 1
CAARMS assessment
Follow-up symptomatic assessment to evaluate the predictive power of sensory treatment (computerized tasks, ERG) for the risk of psychotic transition.
Time frame: 6 months follow up
TAP Working Memory test
Time frame: Day 1
fNART
Time frame: Day 1
Tap attention test
Time frame: Day 1
Visual Object and Space Perception Battery (VOSP)
Time frame: Day 1
Verbal fluency test
Time frame: Day 1
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.