Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a non-invasive electrocardiographic monitoring strategy associated with early discharge in patients with conduction disorder after transfemoral TAVI implantation, and its potential benefits compared to standard care.
Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a non-invasive electrocardiographic monitoring strategy associated with early discharge in patients with conduction disorder after transfemoral TAVI implantation, and its potential benefits compared to standard care.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
Patients discharged according to standard care
Patients discharged with PhysioMem PM 100 4G ambulatory monitoring system
Hospital Unniversitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, Spain
RECRUITINGComposite of all-cause death and rehospitalization for any reason
Proportion of patients with: * All cause of death * Rehospitalization for any reason
Time frame: 30 days
Clinically relevant arrhythmic event requiring a change in therapy
Proportion of patients with clinically relevant arrhythmic event requiring a change in therapy, defined as the occurrence of any of the following: * Cardiac conduction disorders * Clinically relevant tachyarrhythmias
Time frame: 30 days
All-cause death
Incidence of all-cause death
Time frame: 30 days
All-cause death
Incidence of all-cause death
Time frame: 12 months
Unscheduled hospital readmission for any reason
Incidence of unscheduled hospital readmission for any reason
Time frame: 30 days
Unscheduled hospital readmission for any reason
Incidence of unscheduled hospital readmission for any reason
Time frame: 12 months
Cardiovascular death
Incidence of cardiovascular death
Time frame: 30 days
Cardiovascular death
Incidence of cardiovascular death
Time frame: 12 months
Hospital readmission due to cardiovascular cause
Incidence of Hospital readmission due to cardiovascular cause
Time frame: 30 days
Hospital readmission due to cardiovascular cause
Incidence of Hospital readmission due to cardiovascular cause
Time frame: 12 months
Implantation of a permanent pacemaker
Incidence of Implantation of a permanent pacemaker
Time frame: 30 days
Implantation of a permanent pacemaker
Incidence of Implantation of a permanent pacemaker
Time frame: 12 months
High-degree atrioventricular block (II or III)
Incidence of High-degree atrioventricular block (II or III)
Time frame: 30 days
De novo or recurrent atrial fibrillation requiring a change in therapy
Incidence of De novo or recurrent atrial fibrillation requiring a change in therapy
Time frame: 30 days
Time to pacemaker implantation or therapeutic change due to arrhythmia
Incidence of Time to pacemaker implantation or therapeutic change due to arrhythmia
Time frame: 30 days
Time to pacemaker implantation or therapeutic change due to arrhythmia
Incidence of Time to pacemaker implantation or therapeutic change due to arrhythmia
Time frame: 12 months
Resolution vs persistence of conduction disorders
Incidence of Resolution vs persistence of conduction disorders detected in the first 72 hours after TAVI implantation
Time frame: 72 hours
QRS evolution: transient, persistent, or normalisation
Incidence of QRS evolution: transient, persistent, or normalisation
Time frame: 30 days
Remote monitoring
Percentage of time monitored correctly
Time frame: 30 days
hospital length to of stay from TAVI to discharge
Duration of hospitalization post-TAVI procedure
Time frame: At discharge
Direct cost associated with stay and readmissions
Evaluation of Direct cost associated with hospital stay and readmissions
Time frame: 12 Months
Quality of life assessed using Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Quality of life assessed using (KCCQ)assessed using Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). The KCCQ is a 23-item questionnaire developed to assess HRQoL (Health-Related Quality of Life) in patients with congestive heart failure. The KCCQ consists of five domains: physical limitation, symptoms (frequency, severity, and recent change over time), QoL (Quality of Life), social interference, and self-efficacy. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, and higher scores reflect better health status.
Time frame: 30 days
Quality of life assessed using Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Quality of life assessed using (KCCQ)assessed using Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). The KCCQ is a 23-item questionnaire developed to assess HRQoL (Health-Related Quality of Life) in patients with congestive heart failure. The KCCQ consists of five domains: physical limitation, symptoms (frequency, severity, and recent change over time), QoL (Quality of Life), social interference, and self-efficacy. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, and higher scores reflect better health status.
Time frame: 12 Months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.