This is a prospective study, in which there are involved four clinical cases of surgical extraction of impacted maxillary canines followed by immediate implant placement and immediate screw-retained temporary crown using a full-digital workflow that included performing a CBCT, an intraoral scan, AI-assisted segmentation, a virtual wax-up, and the design of a surgical guide and a 30° angled abutment. Then, the follow-up lasting two years is performed to verify the functional and esthetical outcomes. The patients included in this report are part of an ongoing clinical trial, and the complete data set will be published separately upon study completion. The aims is to present clinical outcomes and synthesize evidence comparing placing implant to avoid buccal augmentation using angles abutments versus performing guided bone regeneration (GBR) to allow ideal implant placement with straight abutments, and to evaluate the risk of abutment screw loosening.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
5
Following local anesthetic infiltration and a minimally invasive access, the atraumatic extraction of the impacted canine is performed, preserving the vestibular soft and bone tissues. The implant site is then prepared, and the implant is placed using the surgical guide, with the required insertion torque to achieve primary implant stability.
Dr. Giuseppe D'Albis
Bari, Italy
ISQ
Implant stability quotient. ( 0 - 100)
Time frame: At implant insertion and after 3 months
Periimplant chart
Probing the implant in 6 site.
Time frame: 3 month after implant insertion, 1 year, 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.