This phase Ib/II trial compares the effect of teclistamab and pomalidomide to standard treatment with carfilzomib, pomalidomide and dexamethasone in treating patients with multiple myeloma that has come back after a period of improvement (relapsed). Teclistamab is a bispecific antibody that can bind to two different antigens at the same time. Teclistamab binds to B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), a protein found on some B-cells and myeloma cells, and CD3 on T-cells (a type of white blood cell) and may interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Pomalidomide is in a class of medications called immunomodulatory agents. It works by helping the immune system kill cancer cells and by helping the bone marrow to produce normal blood cells. Carfilzomib blocks the action of enzymes called proteasomes, which may help keep cancer cells from growing and may kill them. It is a type of proteasome inhibitor. Dexamethasone is in a class of medications called corticosteroids. It is used to reduce inflammation and lower the body's immune response to help lessen the side effects of chemotherapy drugs. Giving teclistamab and pomalidomide may be safe, tolerable and improve response by lowering myeloma cells to undetectable levels when compared to standard treatment with carfilzomib, pomalidomide and dexamethasone in treating patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the toxicity of teclistamab and pomalidomide (TP) combination therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) patients in early relapse after one or two lines of therapy and establish the pomalidomide dose to be used with teclistamab in the Phase II portion of the trial. (Phase Ib) II. To determine whether patients with MM in early relapse after one or two lines of therapy who are randomized to teclistamab and pomalidomide (TP) compared to carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (KPd) have superior efficacy measured by minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response status after 9 cycles of treatment. (Phase II) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether patients with MM in early relapse who are randomized to TP compared to KPd have superior progression-free survival (PFS). II. To determine whether patients with MM in early relapse who are randomized to TP compared to KPd have superior overall survival (OS). III. To evaluate safety and compare toxicity rates between TP and KPd arms. IV. To evaluate response by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria. OUTLINE: PHASE IB: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A and B: Patients teclistamab subcutaneously (SC) on days 1, 4, 7, 14, and 21 of cycle 1, days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 2, days 1 and 15 of cycles 3-6, then on day 1 of remaining cycles. Starting with cycle 2, patients receive pomalidomide orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-21 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for up to 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. PHASE II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM C: Patients teclistamab SC on days 1, 4, 7, 14, and 21 of cycle 1, days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 2, days 1 and 15 of cycles 3-6, then on day 1 of subsequent cycles. Starting with cycle 2, patients receive pomalidomide PO QD on days 1-21 of subsequent cycles. Cycles repeat every 28 days for up to 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM D: Patients receive carfilzomib intravenously (IV) on days 1, 2, 8, and 15 of cycle 1, on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 2, then on days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles, pomalidomide PO QD on days 1-21 and dexamethasone PO or IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo urine and blood sample collection, fludeoxyglucose F-18 (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), and bone marrow biopsy and/or aspiration throughout the study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for up to year 2, every 6 months for years 2-5, then yearly for up to 10 years from date of registration/randomization.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
162
Undergo urine and blood sample collection
Undergo bone marrow biopsy and/or aspiration
Undergo bone marrow biopsy and/or aspiration
Given IV
Undergo FDG PET/CT
Given PO or IV
Undergo FDG PET/CT
Given FDG
Given PO
Given SC
Incidence of dose limiting toxicities (Phase Ib)
Will be defined by the toxicities (per National Cancer Institute \[NCI\] Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[CTCAE\] version \[v\] 5.0)possibly, probably, or definitely related to the combination regimen after the teclistamab dose is stable and the combination of teclistamab and pomalidomide has been administered for one full cycle.
Time frame: During cycle 2 (cycle length = 28 days)
Rate of minimal residual disease negativity (Phase II)
Will be determined by the Adaptive Biotechnologies clonoSEQ, registered trademark, assay results. Analysis will be a comparison using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test, stratified on prior autologous stem cell transplant, CD38 antibody refractory and high risk at registration. The CMH estimate of odds ratio with 80% confidence interval (CI) and p-value will be reported. The treatment effect will be evaluated in select subgroups including stratification factors as well as PI-exposed or not and 1st or 2nd relapse. Additionally, logistic regression will be used to assess the treatment effect after adjusting for known prognostic factors.
Time frame: After 9 cycles of treatment (cycle length = 28 days)
Progression-free survival
Will be estimated in the eligible and randomized population using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between arms using the stratified log-rank test. Stratified cox proportional hazards (PH) regression will be used to produce the treatment hazard ratio (HR; Arm C/Arm D) along with the 90% CI, provided PH assumption is valid. Sensitivity analyses excluding untreated patients will be conducted.
Time frame: From randomization until the earlier of progression or death due to any cause or censored at date of last disease evaluation, assessed up to 10 years
Overall survival
Will be estimated in the eligible and randomized population using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between arms using the stratified log-rank test. Stratified cox PH regression will be used to produce the treatment HR (Arm C/Arm D) along with the 90% CI, provided PH assumption is valid. Sensitivity analyses excluding untreated patients will be conducted.
Time frame: From randomization to death due to any cause, or censored at date last known alive, assessed up to 10 years
Incidence of adverse events (AE)
Will be graded according to NCI CTCAE v 5.0 and classified by Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities system organ class. Maximum grade toxicity by AE type will be tabulated. Summaries (count and percentages) will be reported by AE type by arm. Rates of maximum grade 3 or higher (including grade 5) non-hematologic, hematologic and overall toxicity will be calculated along with 90% CIs. AEs will be further analyzed by arm in subsets of serious adverse events per protocol, lethal AEs and treatment-emergent adverse events status.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment
Best response
Will be based on International Myeloma Working Group uniform criteria and will include rates of partial response (PR), very good PR, complete response (CR) and stringent CR.
Time frame: By cycles 12 and 24 (cycle length = 28 days)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.