For the first time, a comparative analysis of the limb axis in patients with unilateral knee OA will be conducted compared to the contralateral uninjured side using Multisliced computed tomography (MSCT) and vertical CT (weight-bearing CT). This analysis will identify the pathological and physiological degrees of varus in patients with unilateral gonarthrosis. Indications for mechanical and kinematic limb axis alignment will be substantiated depending on the degree of varus deformity. Aim of the study: To improve the results of total knee arthroplasty in patients with varus deformity by optimizing the degree of varus correction. Objectives: To analyze physiological and pathological varus in patients with unilateral osteoarthritis under physiological loading. To develop an algorithm for applying various types of limb alignment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
300
Total knee arthroplasty using active robotic surgical system
Total knee arthroplasty using active robotic surgical system
University clinical hospital №1 I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University. The Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery
Moscow, Russia
RECRUITINGImplant position assessment
CT scanning; these diagnostic methods assess the position of the implant, analysis of deformation, assessment of the angles in the knee joint (LDFA, MPTA, MA, these diagnostic methods assess the position of the implant, analysis of deformation, assessment of the angles in the knee joint, analyze the rotation of implant)
Time frame: 2 months postoperatively
Implant position assessment
CT scanning; these diagnostic methods assess the position of the implant, analysis of deformation, assessment of the angles in the knee joint (LDFA, MPTA, MA, these diagnostic methods assess the position of the implant, analysis of deformation, assessment of the angles in the knee joint, analyze the rotation of implant)
Time frame: 6 months postoperativley
Implant position assessment
CT scanning; these diagnostic methods assess the position of the implant, analysis of deformation, assessment of the angles in the knee joint (LDFA, MPTA, MA, these diagnostic methods assess the position of the implant, analysis of deformation, assessment of the angles in the knee joint, analyze the rotation of implant)
Time frame: 12 months postoperatively
Quality of life and knee function assessment
Knee Society Score(KSS score), which combines subjective and objective information and separates the knee score (pain, stability, range of motion etc.) from the functional score of the patient (ability to walk, go up and down stairs)
Time frame: 2,6,12 months postoperatively
Quality of life assessment (joint awareness after surgery)
FJS-12, measures the clinical outcomes focusing on joint awareness after surgery
Time frame: 2,6,12 months postoperatively
Quality of life assessment (the condition of patients)
WOMAC score is a widely used, proprietary set of standardized questionnaires used by health professionals to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip, including pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints
Time frame: 2, 6, 12 months postoperatively
Pain assessment
Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain - dynamics pain assessment
Time frame: 2, 6, 12 months postoperatively
Quality of life assessment (an individual's activities of daily living)
OKS score. The OKS is a patient reported outcome measure that consists of 12 questions about an individual's activities of daily living and how they have been affected by pain over the preceding four weeks.
Time frame: 2, 6, 12 months postoperatively
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.