The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of metabolic markers (HOMA-IR, triglyceride/HDL ratio, HbA1c, waist and hip circumference measurements, BMI, etc.) on pain and central sensitization in patients diagnosed with lipedema. The primary objective is to investigate the association between metabolic markers and central sensitization. The secondary objective is to assess the relationship between metabolic markers and pain intensity, pain phenotype, and functional status.
Lipedema is a chronic disorder observed in women, characterized by symmetrical accumulation of adipose tissue in the lower extremities, easy bruising, and marked tenderness or pain. In lipedema, pain is often spontaneous, increases with pressure, and does not always correlate with the amount of adipose tissue. This suggests that lipedema-related pain cannot be explained solely by peripheral mechanical factors. Previous studies in patients with lipedema have demonstrated reduced pressure pain thresholds, bilateral and symmetrical hyperalgesia, and increased pain sensitivity extending beyond the areas of local adipose tissue involvement. These findings suggest that alterations in central pain processing mechanisms may occur in lipedema and that central sensitization may play a role. However, systematic studies specifically evaluating central sensitization in lipedema remain limited. Although lipedema has long been considered a "metabolically protected" condition, recent studies have reported that insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and components of metabolic syndrome are more frequently observed, particularly in lipedema cases accompanied by obesity. HOMA-IR, which is used to evaluate insulin resistance; the triglyceride/HDL ratio (TG/HDL), a marker of atherogenic dyslipidemia; and HbA1c, reflecting long-term glycemic load, are closely associated with chronic inflammation and metabolic dysfunction. In the chronic pain literature, metabolic dysfunction has been shown to play an important role in the development of central sensitization and nociplastic pain, with obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia being associated with central pain amplification. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies in lipedema have simultaneously evaluated the relationship between metabolic parameters, pain phenotype, and central sensitization. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of metabolic markers (HOMA-IR, triglyceride/HDL ratio, HbA1c, waist and hip circumference measurements, BMI, etc.) on pain and central sensitization in patients diagnosed with lipedema. The primary objective is to investigate the association between metabolic markers and central sensitization. The secondary objective is to assess the relationship between metabolic markers and pain intensity, pain phenotype, and functional status.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
59
Marmara University Faculty of Medicine Pendik Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Pendik, Turkey (Türkiye)
RECRUITINGCentral Sensitization Inventory (CSI)
The Central Sensitization Inventory is a self-report screening tool developed to assess the presence and severity of symptoms associated with central sensitization. The inventory evaluates symptoms reflecting sensitization in central nervous system pain-processing mechanisms, including widespread pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and cognitive complaints. The CSI consists of 25 items, each scored on a scale from 0 to 4, with a total score ranging from 0 to 100. A total score of 40 or higher is considered to be associated with a high likelihood of central sensitization.
Time frame: At baseline
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is used to measure and monitor pain intensity. A score of "0" represents no pain, while "10" indicates the worst pain imaginable. Patients are asked to rate their pain on a scale from 0 to 10. Due to its simplicity and ease of understanding, this scale is frequently used in clinical research.
Time frame: At baseline
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
The Fatigue Severity Scale is a self-report measure used to evaluate the impact of fatigue on daily life and functional activities. The scale consists of 9 items, each scored on a scale from 1 to 7. Higher average scores indicate greater fatigue severity.
Time frame: At baseline
Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire (DN4)
The DN4 questionnaire was developed to assess the presence of neuropathic pain. It consists of 10 items derived from symptom-based questions and clinical examination findings. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, and a score of 4 or higher is considered indicative of neuropathic pain.
Time frame: At baseline
Short Form-12 (SF-12)
The Short Form-12 is a questionnaire used to assess general health status and health-related quality of life. It consists of 12 items. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: At baseline
Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS)
The Jenkins Sleep Scale is a self-report measure consisting of four items that evaluates the frequency of sleep problems experienced over the past month. Higher scores indicate a greater frequency of sleep disturbance symptoms, such as difficulty falling asleep, nocturnal awakenings, and early morning awakening.
Time frame: At baseline
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale is a self-report measure consisting of 20 items that evaluates lower extremity functional status during activities of daily living. Lower total scores indicate greater functional limitation, whereas higher scores reflect better lower extremity function.
Time frame: At baseline
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire is a measure consisting of seven items that assess the time spent walking, performing moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity activities, and sitting. The total score is calculated by considering the duration (minutes) and frequency (days) of walking, moderate-intensity activity, and vigorous-intensity activity. Energy expenditure for these activities is expressed in MET-minutes. Standard MET values have been established for each activity: sitting 1.5 MET, walking 3.3 MET, moderate-intensity physical activity 4 MET, and vigorous-intensity physical activity 8 MET. Using these values, daily and weekly physical activity levels can be calculated.
Time frame: At baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.