BLOOD-dose is a multicentre, adaptive, randomized, multidomain platform trial designed to optimize treatment dosing strategies in adult patients with haematological diseases. The BLOOD-dose core protocol outlines the overall clinical trial design that applies to all included interventions, while domain-specific appendices (DSA) detail the unique characteristics of each domain and specify domain-specific interventions. New domains will be incorporated over time to address distinct dose-optimization research questions across different haematological conditions and interventions.
Background: Approved dosing regimens in haematology are largely derived from clinical trials conducted in relatively homogeneous patient populations, which may not reflect the diversity encountered in routine clinical practice. Many new anticancer and haematological treatments are developed using early phase trial designs that define dose selection primarily based on dose-limiting toxicity, often aiming to establish a maximum tolerated dose. While this approach supports regulatory approval, it may not identify the optimal biological or clinically effective dose for long-term treatment. This uncertainty may contribute to overtreatment, increased toxicity, impaired quality of life, and unnecessary healthcare costs. Furthermore, established long-term or life-long treatment regimens represent important opportunities for dose optimization, especially as therapeutic strategies and patient needs evolve over time. Platform trials provide an efficient framework to evaluate multiple interventions within a single disease area under a unified master protocol. In domain-based platform trials, interventions are grouped into predefined domains, enabling efficient comparisons, rapid progress, and the addition of new research domains over time. Objectives: The BLOOD-dose platform trial aims to determine the optimal treatment intensity for patients with haematological diseases. Due to disease heterogeneity, objectives, endpoints, and estimands will vary across domains. Outcomes: Given the heterogeneity of haematological diseases, objectives, endpoints, and estimands will differ across domains. A core outcome set (COS) comprising 6 core outcome measurements has been established through a Delphi consensus process. Each domain is expected to include at least one core outcome measure as its primary endpoint, with all other core outcomes included as secondary endpoints. Design: BLOOD-dose is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, adaptive, randomized, multidomain platform trial. Domains and interventions: Interventions across different haematological diseases will be defined in domain-specific appendices that will be amended over time. Eligibility: In addition to meeting the core protocol eligibility criteria, participants must also meet the domain-specific eligibility criteria for at least one domain.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
400
ElasTEC: A phase 4, open-label, parallel-group, two-arm domain on the BLOOD-dose platform trial to evaluate the non-inferiority, safety, and effectiveness of reduced-frequency bispecific antibody treatments (teclistamab, talquetamab, elranatamab and linvoseltamab) compared with standard-frequency treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
BELLIS: A phase 4, open-label, parallel-group, two-arm domain to assess the effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib and zanubrutinib) compared to standard-dose in male and female patients with Waldenström´s macroglobulinemia
Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Greater Copenhagen Area, Denmark
Aalborg University Hospital
Aalborg, Denmark
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Denmark
Odense University Hospital
Odense, Denmark
Roskilde University Hospital
Roskilde, Denmark
Overall survival
To compare survival between the interventions. The interventions will be defined in the DSA. The end of period follow-up will be defined in the DSA.
Time frame: OS is defined as the time from randomization until the time of death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years.
Progression free survival
Clinical progression will be defined in the domain according to the disease being investigated. Clinical progression will be defined in the domain according to the disease being investigated. The end of follow-upperiod will be defined in the DSA.
Time frame: PFS is defined as the time from randomization until clinical progression or death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years.
Patient-reported health-related quality of life
Patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) will be measured with at least one of the following instruments: Mean change from baseline in the HRQOL score for EORTC QLQ-C30.
Time frame: 1 year
Number of Participants with Treatment Emergent Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v6.0
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events. AEs of interest will be specified in the DSA.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Hospital Admission
Rate of hospitalisation per 100-participant-patient years. The end of follow-up period will be defined in the DSA.
Time frame: From Time of randomization to end of follow-up, assessed up to 2 years.
Cost of intervention
Exposure to trial medicinal products.
Time frame: From first dose to last recorded date of dosing OR From randomization to last recorded date of dosing or end of study, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 2 years.
Anne Louise Tølbøll Sørensen, Ass. Prof.
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.