This study is a single-arm feasibility trial designed to evaluate the implementation, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a culturally adapted Compassionate Mindful Resilience (CMR) intervention among adolescents in Thailand. The study is conducted in a secondary school setting and targets students aged 16 to 18 years. Adolescence is a critical developmental period associated with increased emotional vulnerability, academic pressure, and exposure to mental health risks. In Thailand, recent evidence indicates rising levels of stress, anxiety, and reduced psychological well-being among young people. School-based preventive interventions that strengthen internal coping skills are therefore a public health priority. While mindfulness-based interventions have demonstrated benefits in Western contexts, there is limited evidence regarding compassion-focused mindfulness programs that are culturally adapted for Thai adolescents. The CMR intervention is a structured, manualized behavioral program that integrates mindfulness, self-compassion, and resilience-building skills. The program was originally developed by MindfulnessUK and subsequently adapted for the Thai adolescent context through a co-production process involving students, teachers, and school counselors. Cultural adaptations focused on language use, contextual relevance of examples, and alignment with the Thai educational environment, while maintaining fidelity to the core theoretical framework. All participants enrolled in the study will receive the CMR intervention. The program consists of four weekly group sessions, each lasting approximately 90 minutes, delivered after school hours to minimize disruption to academic activities. Sessions include guided mindfulness practices, group discussions, and practical exercises aimed at increasing present-moment awareness, cultivating self-compassion, improving emotional regulation, and strengthening resilience. Home practice activities are encouraged between sessions to support skill integration into daily life. The primary objective of the study is to assess feasibility. Feasibility outcomes include recruitment rate, retention rate, session attendance, intervention fidelity, and participant acceptability. These indicators will inform whether the intervention can be delivered as planned in a Thai school setting and whether progression to a larger-scale trial is justified. Secondary objectives explore preliminary changes in mental health-related outcomes. These include mindfulness, self-compassion, resilience, and overall well-being, measured using validated Thai-language instruments before and after completion of the intervention. Although the study is not powered to test effectiveness, these data will provide estimates of variability and potential effect sizes to inform the design of a future randomized controlled trial. Participant safety is addressed through a predefined distress protocol. A school counselor is available during all intervention sessions to provide immediate support if participants experience emotional distress. Ethical approval has been obtained from the relevant institutional ethics committee, and written assent from participants, along with parental or guardian consent, is required prior to enrollment. Overall, this feasibility study will generate critical information on the practicality, acceptability, and preliminary impact of the Compassionate Mindful Resilience program for adolescents in Thailand. The findings will guide the development of a future definitive trial and contribute to the evidence base for culturally appropriate, school-based mental health promotion interventions in low- and middle-income settings.
Detailed Description Study Framework and Theoretical Basis This feasibility study constitutes Phase 3 of a comprehensive research project designed to address the rising rates of stress, anxiety, and substance use risks among Thai adolescents. The intervention utilizes the Compassionate Mindful Resilience (CMR) programme, which integrates secular mindfulness with compassion-based approaches to enhance cognitive resilience and emotional regulation. While MBIs have shown efficacy in adult populations, this study evaluates a culturally adapted version specifically for the Thai secondary school context, where collectivist values and Buddhist traditions may influence implementation. Trial Design and Procedural Workflow The study employs a single-arm, pre-post feasibility design. This approach is selected to evaluate implementation parameters and participant engagement prior to committing to a full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT). * Intervention Delivery: The CMR programme consists of eight modules delivered over four weekly 90-minute group sessions. Sessions are conducted after school hours (provisionally 16:00-17:30) to minimize academic disruption and mitigate potential stigma associated with mental health initiatives. * Fidelity and Facilitation: The programme is delivered by a PhD candidate trained in CMR under academic supervision from Queen's University Belfast. Delivery fidelity is maintained through adherence checklists, session logs, and standardized recap materials for participants who miss sessions. * Stratified Sampling: To ensure developmental diversity, the study utilizes stratified random sampling across Grades 10, 11, and 12, aimed at achieving a balanced representation from the student population. Technical Application of Participation Models The research process incorporates established participatory frameworks to assess the depth of stakeholder engagement: * Hart's Ladder of Children's Participation: Evaluates whether youth involvement moves beyond tokenism to "Consulted but Informed" and "Adult-Initiated Shared Decisions" * Arnstein's Ladder of Participation: Used to track the transition toward "Partnership" and "Delegated Power" during the co-production and evaluation phases. Statistical Analysis Plan The analysis focuses on determining the feasibility of the protocol for future larger-scale implementation: * Feasibility Metrics: Recruitment rates, consent rates, session attendance, and participant retention will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. * Preliminary Effectiveness: Quantitative changes in psychosocial outcomes will be assessed using paired t-tests or non-parametric equivalents. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) will be calculated to estimate the magnitude of change for future power calculations. * Exposure Analysis: An exploratory subset analysis will be reported for participants who attend at least 75% of the sessions (three out of four) to investigate dose-response relationships. Qualitative Process Evaluation To complement quantitative data, a process evaluation will explore the acceptability and contextual relevance of the programme. * Thematic Analysis: Post-intervention focus groups and brief exit interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim in Thai, and translated into English. * Analytical Rigor: Qualitative data will be managed using NVivo software and analyzed via Reflexive Thematic Analysis. A second coder will review a subset of transcripts to ensure credibility and an audit trail will be maintained. Data Security and Transfer Protocols * Pseudonymization: All data are de-identified at the source using study codes; identifiable information remains in Thailand and is not transferred. * Electronic Management: Scanned documents and audio transcripts are stored on encrypted, password-protected systems with role-based access. * Cross-Border Transfer: Pseudonymized data transferred for analysis utilize encrypted channels in compliance with university governance and data protection legislation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
46
A group-based behavioral intervention delivered over four weekly 90-minute sessions (6 hours total contact time). The program integrates mindfulness, self-compassion, and resilience training through eight modules. Technical components include: * Mindfulness \& Awareness: Breathing practices, body scans, and "being mode" vs "doing mode". * Emotional Intelligence: Application of the RAIN (Recognise, Acknowledge, Investigate, Nurture), HEARTS, and STOP (Stop, Take a breath, Observe, Proceed) models. * Resilience Building: Cognitive reappraisal, affectionate breathing, and social connection strategies. * Impulse Management: "Urge surfing" meditations and mindful decision-making to support substance-use prevention. * Home Practice: Daily 10-minute meditation, journaling, and mindful movement.
Recruitment Rate
This measure represents the proportion of eligible students who provide informed consent. It is measured as a percentage, calculated as: (Number of Consented Participants / Number of Eligible Students Invited) x 100. The target for success is a recruitment rate of 70% or higher.
Time frame: Week 0 (at the end of recruitment)
Retention Rate
This measure represents the proportion of enrolled participants who complete the study and provide post-intervention data. It is measured as a percentage, calculated as: (Number of Participants Providing Post-Intervention Data / Number Enrolled) x 100. The target for success is a retention rate of 80% or higher.
Time frame: Week 4 (post-intervention).
Session Attendance
This measure tracks participant adherence based on the total number of sessions attended. It is calculated as the mean number of sessions attended out of the 4 scheduled sessions. Scores range from 0 to 4 sessions, where a higher number indicates greater attendance.
Time frame: From start to end of the intervention (Week 1 to Week 4).
Change in Mindfulness Scores (Srithanya Sati Scale)
This outcome assesses the change in dispositional mindfulness using the Srithanya Sati Scale, an 11-item self-report questionnaire. The total score is calculated as the sum of all 11 items. The minimum score is 11 and the maximum score is 44. Higher scores indicate greater levels of mindfulness. The "Change" is calculated by subtracting the Baseline (Week 0) total score from the Post-intervention (Week 4) total score.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 4).
Change in Self-Compassion Scores (SCS-Y Thai version)
This outcome assesses the change in how youth treat themselves with kindness during difficult times using a 17-item scale. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale. The total score is calculated as the mean of all 17 items (after reverse-scoring negative items). The minimum score is 1.0 and the maximum score is 5.0. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-compassion. The "Change" is calculated by subtracting the Baseline (Week 0) mean score from the Post-intervention (Week 4) mean score.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 4)
Change in Resilience Scores (CD-RISC-10)
This outcome assesses the change in psychological resilience using a 10-item scale. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (0-4). The total score is calculated as the sum of all 10 items. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 40. Higher scores represent greater psychological resilience. The "Change" is calculated by subtracting the Baseline (Week 0) total score from the Post-intervention (Week 4) total score.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 4)
Change in Subjective Well-being (WHO-5 Well-being Index)
This outcome measures the change in subjective psychological well-being using a 5-item scale. The total score is calculated as the raw sum of the 5 items. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 25. Higher scores indicate better subjective well-being. The "Change" is calculated by subtracting the Baseline (Week 0) raw score from the Post-intervention (Week 4) raw score.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 4)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.