Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignant skin tumour. The standard treatment is micrographically controlled surgery (MMS), which achieves high cure rates but requires considerable time and personnel. A key problem is the inadequate preoperative determination of tumour margins, which often leads to multiple cycles of excision. The aim of this multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled intervention study is to evaluate line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) for preoperative margin determination in BCC within the framework of MMS. Research question: Can preoperative LC-OCT-assisted margin marking increase the efficiency of MMS by reducing the number of excision cycles required without compromising oncological safety? Methodology: Approximately 290 patients with histologically confirmed BCC will be enrolled at five German centres and randomly assigned to either standard MMS or MMS with upstream LC-OCT margin determination. In the intervention group, the excision margin will be specifically extended if a tumour is detected in the LC-OCT. Primary endpoint: Number of MMS cycles required to achieve R0 resection. Secondary endpoints: Total duration of surgery, size of surgical defect, cosmetic outcome (POSAS), patient satisfaction and stress, sensitivity and specificity of LC-OCT compared to histopathology. Significance: The study addresses the clinical conflict of objectives between complete tumour removal and maximum tissue preservation. Successful implementation could optimise MMS through modern imaging, conserve surgical resources and improve patient care in the long term.
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer worldwide and occurs predominantly in fair-skinned populations. In Germany, approximately one in three individuals will develop BCC during their lifetime. Although BCC rarely metastasizes, it shows locally destructive growth with irregular, finger-like extensions into surrounding tissue, which can make complete surgical removal challenging. The majority of tumors arise in the sun-exposed head and neck region. Micrographic surgery (Mohs micrographic surgery, MMS) represents the gold standard treatment for high-risk BCC, as it allows complete margin control and offers the highest cure rates. However, MMS is often time-consuming and resource-intensive because multiple sequential excision stages may be required until histopathology confirms complete tumor removal (R0 resection). Preoperative estimation of tumor margins is usually based on clinical examination and dermoscopy with a standard safety margin of 2-3 mm. This approach may be inaccurate, particularly in tumors with subclinical extension, which can lead either to unnecessarily large excisions or to residual tumor tissue requiring additional surgical stages. Non-invasive imaging techniques have increasingly been investigated to improve the preoperative assessment of BCC margins. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the more recently developed line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) allow high-resolution, real-time imaging of the skin. These technologies enable visualization of skin structures with near-histological resolution and can detect characteristic morphological features of BCC in vivo. Previous studies have demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy of OCT and LC-OCT for the detection and subtyping of BCC and suggest that these methods may also be useful for defining tumor margins before surgery. In particular, LC-OCT combines the advantages of conventional OCT with the cellular resolution of confocal microscopy, allowing both vertical and horizontal imaging of the skin at high resolution. This enables detailed visualization of tumor architecture and potentially facilitates the detection of subclinical tumor extensions beyond the clinically visible borders. The present multicenter randomized controlled study aims to evaluate whether LC-OCT-guided preoperative margin assessment can improve the efficiency of MMS. In the intervention group, the lateral tumor margins are examined preoperatively using LC-OCT. If tumor structures are detected at the planned resection margin, the surgical margin is extended accordingly before the first excision step. MMS is then performed according to the standard surgical protocol with histopathological examination of the margins. In centers where available, excised tissue may additionally be examined postoperatively using ex vivo LC-OCT or confocal microscopy to correlate imaging findings with histopathology. The study investigates whether this image-guided approach can reduce the number of surgical stages required to achieve complete tumor removal, while maintaining oncological safety. By enabling more accurate preoperative mapping of tumor margins, LC-OCT-guided surgery may improve surgical planning and increase the likelihood of complete excision in the first stage of MMS. In addition, improved margin delineation could allow more tissue-sparing surgery, potentially leading to smaller surgical defects and better cosmetic outcomes. Overall, this study evaluates the clinical utility of integrating LC-OCT into the surgical workflow of MMS. The results may provide evidence for a more efficient and resource-conserving surgical strategy in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma while maintaining the high oncological safety standards of micrographic surgery.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
290
Both groups undergo micrographically controlled excision (Mohs surgery) in accordance with standard procedure. Surgical margins are examined histopathologically as usual (e.g. Tübingen cake, Munich method). If tumour remnants are detected, re-excision (MMS cycle) is performed until the tumour is completely removed (R0). The difference in the intervention group is that they will receive preoperative (and if available) postoperative margin mapping of the BCC before surgery.
University Hospital Augsburg
Augsburg, Germany
University Hospital Dresden
Dresden, Germany
University Hospital Erlangen
Erlangen, Germany
Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital
Munich, Germany
München Klinik
Munich, Germany
Number of surgical excision cycles (MMS cycles) required until complete tumour removal
Primary endpoints: Number of surgical excision cycles (MMS cycles) required until complete tumour removal (R0 status). This target parameter is directly related to the main question of whether preoperative margin assessment using LC-OCT increases the efficiency of MMS. A significant difference (e.g. fewer MMS cycles in the intervention group) would prove that the image-guided procedure is more effective.
Time frame: On the day of surgery (Day 0), after the first histopathological margin assessment
Total duration of the surgical procedure
Total duration of the surgical procedure (in minutes) → Recorded from the incision to the end of the operation.
Time frame: intraoperatively, on the day of surgery (Day 0)
Area of the surgical defect after complete tumour removal
Area of the surgical defect after complete tumour removal (in cm²) → Documented for the purpose of assessing tissue preservation.
Time frame: after the last excision, before wound closure
Cosmetic outcome of the scar
Cosmetic outcome of the scar (e.g. using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)). The observer scale of the POSAS consists of six items (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability and surface area). All items are scored on a scale ranging from 1 ('like normal skin') to 10 ('worst scar imaginable'). The sum of the six items results in a total score of the POSAS observer scale. Categories boxes are added for each item. Furthermore, an overall opinion is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 10. All parameters should preferably be compared to normal skin on a comparable anatomic location. → Assessment after a defined post-operative period.
Time frame: at follow-up 2, approx. week 6-12
Patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction → Determined by validated questionnaire (e.g. Likert scale for subjective evaluation of the process and result). A 5-point Likert scale is a popular rating scale for surveys that uses five options to measure opinions, attitudes, or perceptions, typically ranging from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree," with a neutral option in the middle.
Time frame: week 6-12
Correlation between LC-OCT findings and histopathological margin status
Correlation between LC-OCT findings and histopathological margin status → Specification of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of LC-OCT.
Time frame: within 7 days after surgery
Number of unexpected tumour detections in peripheral areas originally assessed as tumour-free
Number of unexpected tumour detections in peripheral areas originally assessed as tumour-free → Evaluation of the diagnostic reliability of LC-OCT.
Time frame: within 7 days after surgery
Occurrence of complications or adverse events
Occurrence of complications or adverse events (e.g. delayed wound healing, infection) → To assess the safety of the procedure.
Time frame: until completion of the second follow-up (i.e., by week 6-12)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.