The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of withdrawing mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRA) in patients with stable heart failure with improved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFimpEF). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does withdrawal of MRAs lead to a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 10%, resulting in a final LVEF below 40%? Does withdrawal of MRAs cause a relative increase in NT-proBNP levels greater than 50% above age-adjusted thresholds? Researchers will compare MRAs withdrawal (placebo) with continuation of therapy to determine whether medication withdrawal can be performed safely without worsening heart failure status. Participants will: Attend scheduled clinical visits over a 24-week follow-up period; Undergo echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction before study visits; Provide blood samples for NT-proBNP measurement at each visit; Provide one blood sample for genetic analysis of polymorphisms related to the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; Receive either continued MRA therapy or placebo as part of a double-blind randomized design; Be monitored for clinical stability, symptoms of heart failure, and potential adverse events during follow-up.
Heart failure (HF) is a major global health problem associated with high rates of hospitalization, mortality, and healthcare costs. Contemporary guideline-directed medical therapy has substantially improved outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Standard pharmacological management includes four major therapeutic pillars: beta-blockers, inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or ARNI), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. These therapies improve survival and reduce hospitalizations. A subset of patients with HFrEF experiences significant improvement in cardiac function after treatment and is now classified as having heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF). These patients typically demonstrate recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction from previously reduced values to ≥40%. However, recovery of ejection fraction does not necessarily represent complete reversal of the underlying disease process, and structural or molecular abnormalities may persist. Current clinical guidelines generally recommend continuation of guideline-directed medical therapy even after improvement in ejection fraction due to concerns about relapse. Despite the benefits of these therapies, patients with heart failure frequently require multiple medications to manage both their cardiac condition and associated comorbidities. Polypharmacy can increase the risk of adverse drug reactions, medication non-adherence, drug interactions, and treatment complexity. Simplification of pharmacological regimens may therefore represent an important strategy to improve adherence and reduce treatment burden in selected patients. Previous studies investigating withdrawal of heart failure therapies have shown mixed results. In some populations, withdrawal of key disease-modifying medications resulted in relapse of cardiac dysfunction or worsening clinical status. However, there is limited evidence regarding selective withdrawal of specific medication classes in carefully selected patients who have achieved clinical stability and significant improvement in cardiac function. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, such as spironolactone, play an important role in the treatment of HFrEF by blocking the effects of aldosterone, thereby reducing myocardial fibrosis, neurohormonal activation, and ventricular remodeling. Although their benefits in patients with reduced ejection fraction are well established, the necessity of maintaining this therapy indefinitely in patients with stable HFimpEF remains uncertain. The SIMPLIFY-HF study is designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of discontinuing MRAs in clinically stable patients with HFimpEF. This study will be a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing withdrawal of MRAs (with placebo substitution) versus continuation of therapy. Eligible participants will have a history of heart failure with previously reduced ejection fraction that improved to ≥40%, stable clinical status, optimized background therapy, and no recent hospitalizations or signs of decompensation. Participants will be followed for 24 weeks with scheduled clinical visits, echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular function, and measurement of NT-proBNP levels as a biomarker of cardiac stress. Safety monitoring will be performed throughout the study to detect any signs of worsening heart failure, including deterioration in functional status, reduction in ejection fraction, or significant increases in natriuretic peptide levels. The results of this study may provide important evidence regarding whether selected patients with stable HFimpEF can safely undergo simplification of pharmacological therapy through withdrawal of MRAs, potentially reducing treatment burden while maintaining clinical stability.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
90
Participants assigned to the intervention group will undergo discontinuation of MRAs as part of a treatment simplification strategy in patients with stable heart failure with improved left ventricular ejection fraction. All other guideline-directed medical therapies will be maintained according to the treating physician's judgment. Participants will be clinically monitored during follow-up to assess stability, potential recurrence of heart failure symptoms, and other clinical outcomes after withdrawal of MRAs.
Participants assigned to the control group will continue MRAs as part of their guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure with improved left ventricular ejection fraction. All other heart failure medications will be maintained according to standard clinical practice and the treating physician's judgment. Participants will be clinically monitored during follow-up to assess clinical stability, heart failure symptoms, and other relevant outcomes.
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
RECRUITINGChange in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Decrease from baseline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of greater than 10%, resulting in a final LVEF below 40%.
Time frame: 6 months
Change in NT-proBNP Levels
Increase from baseline in NT-proBNP levels of greater than 50%, with age-specific cut-off values: 450 pg/mL for participants younger than 50 years, 900 pg/mL for those between 50 and 75 years, and 1800 pg/mL for participants older than 75 years.
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.