This study evaluates the effect of two different doses of a consumer-grade product, MyCondro™, on individuals experiencing mobility issues related to knee osteoarthritis. The primary goal is to measure improvements in overall joint health and mobility by tracking changes in participants' total WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) scores from the beginning to the end of the trial. Additionally, the study aims to assess secondary outcomes, including the product's impact on pain, stiffness, knee function, patient-reported improvement, inflammatory blood markers (CRP), and daily physical activity.
This decentralized, consumer-driven clinical study is designed to evaluate the impact of two different doses of MyCondro™, a consumer-grade product, on physical mobility and joint health in adults aged 45 and older with self-reported knee osteoarthritis. The primary objective is to assess the change from baseline in the total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score within each dose group by the end of the trial. Secondary objectives will measure the product's effect on pain, stiffness, knee function, subjective impression of improvement, and inflammatory blood markers (CRP), alongside objective digital metrics of physical activity tracked via wearable devices. Because this research utilizes a direct-to-consumer model-where participants make an informed choice to enroll and collect data at home without a traditional doctor-patient relationship-the findings will provide highly relevant, real-world knowledge regarding the product's tolerability and efficacy to guide the formulation and design of future studies. The double-blind study spans up to 20 weeks, encompassing a screening period, randomization and shipping, a baseline phase, and a 12-week product use period. Eligible participants are randomly assigned to receive either a 300mg or 600mg dose of the study product, with the investigators, study team, and participants remaining blinded to the group assignments. All trial activities are conducted remotely using the Consumer Health Learning and Organizing Ecosystem (Chloe) app by People Science. Through this web-based platform, participants will securely submit demographic data, medical history, and patient-reported outcome surveys. By combining these app-based questionnaires with at-home blood sample collection kits and wearable health tracking technology, the study aims to successfully and safely capture comprehensive health data entirely within the participant's home setting.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
240
This is a non-animal Chondroitin sulfate formulation.
This is a non-animal Chondroitin sulfate formulation.
People Science
Los Angeles, California, United States
RECRUITINGMyCondro's effectiveness
To evaluate the effectiveness of two different doses of MyCondro on mobility, activity, and joint health by measuring the change in total WOMAC scores from baseline to the end of the study within each dose group
Time frame: 12 weeks
Knee Symptoms and Physical Function
This outcome evaluates the product's effect on overall joint health and mobility. Efficacy is measured by tracking the change from baseline in both the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)-assessing pain, stiffness, and physical function-and the TLKS (Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale). Data will be collected at 1 month, 2 months, and the end of the study to compare improvements within and between the two dose groups.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Knee pain at rest and in motion
This objective specifically assesses the product's impact on acute and chronic pain levels during different physical states. Utilizing a daily numeric rating scale (NRS), the investigators will track the change from baseline in average weekly knee pain scores-both at rest and in motion-comparing the outcomes between the two dosage groups.
Time frame: 14 Weeks
Subjective Impression of Improvement
This measure captures the participant's personal perception of their symptom relief and overall disease activity. It calculates the change from baseline in the average PGADA (Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity) score at 1 month, 2 months, and the end of the study to determine if either dose group experiences a more noticeable subjective improvement.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Overall Quality of Life
This objective examines the broader, holistic impact of the study product on a participant's daily living and well-being. By comparing baseline Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey scores to those collected at the study's conclusion, the study investigators can analyze changes in general quality of life between the two doses.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Systemic Inflammatory Blood Markers
This objective investigates the physiological effects of the study product on underlying inflammation. The study investigators will measure the change from baseline in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels at the end of the study to evaluate and compare the biochemical impact of the two different doses.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Reliance on Rescue Medications
This outcome tracks the ongoing need for supplementary pain relief during the trial. It evaluates the frequency of standard rescue medication use (paracetamol/acetaminophen and oral NSAIDs) during the product use period. This metric tracks the ongoing need for supplementary pain relief, and differences in usage between the dose groups via a daily diary.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Safety and Tolerability
This critical measure ensures the study product is safe for consumer use at both the 300mg and 600mg dosages. The study team will track and assess the number, frequency, and severity of all adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and any trial withdrawals caused by AEs throughout the duration of the product use period.
Time frame: 14 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.