The purpose of this study is to compare momelotinib and ruxolitinib as treatments for myelofibrosis with low blood cell counts. Both drugs are approved by the FDA to treat myelofibrosis. The study asks which drug does a better job at shrinking the spleen.
This study is being done to answer this question: Does momelotinib or ruxolitinib do a better job at shrinking the spleen in people who have myelofibrosis with low blood cell counts and haven't been treated yet? Other goals of this study are to find out: * Which drug does a better job of preventing the need for blood transfusions or other treatments * Which drug does a better job of reducing myelofibrosis symptoms * What side effects the drugs cause Momelotinib and ruxolitinib are JAK inhibitors. JAK inhibitors are medicines that block a type of protein that can cause the immune system to be too active, which can cause pain and swelling (including in the spleen). JAK inhibitors are the most commonly used drugs for myelofibrosis that has caused serious symptoms including swelling in the spleen. There are many different JAK inhibitors approved by the FDA to treat myelofibrosis, but no previous studies have compared these drugs with each other for treating myelofibrosis in people with low blood cell counts who haven't been treated yet.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
268
200 mg daily x 96 weeks.
Twice daily per treating investigator discretion not to exceed protocol specified guidelines.
To estimate and compare the proportion of participants achieving a dual response [SVR35] and transfusion independence response from red blood cell transfusions.
To estimate and compare the proportion of patients achieving a dual response both spleen response \[SVR35\] and transfusion independence response \[TI-R\] from red blood cell transfusions at week 24 post-Step 1 randomization in JAK-inhibitor naïve participants with myelofibrosis treated with momelotinib versus ruxolitinib.
Time frame: 24 weeks after randomization
TI-R Rate
To estimate and compare the TI-R rate at week 24, post-Step 1 randomization in each treatment arm.
Time frame: 24 weeks after Step 1 Randomization
SVR35 at week 24 post-randomization
To estimate and compare the rates of SVR35 at week 24 post-randomization in each treatment arm.
Time frame: 24 weeks after Step 1 Randomization
OS
To estimate overall survival (OS) in each treatment arm.
Time frame: 96 weeks after Step 1 Randomization
PFS
To estimate progression-free survival (PFS) in each treatment arm.
Time frame: 96 weeks after Step 1 Randomization
SVR35 at week 24 post-randomization
To estimate and compare SVR35 at week 24 post-randomization in each treatment arm with a sensitivity analysis based on a modeled version of the continuous spleen response rate.
Time frame: 24 weeks after Step 1 Randomization
Allogeneic Transplantation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
To tabulate the proportion of participants in each arm who undergo allogeneic transplantation at week 24 and week 48 post-Step 1 randomization.
Time frame: 96 weeks after Step 1 Randomization
Cross-over
To tabulate the number of participants on each arm who cross over.
Time frame: 72 weeks after Step 1 Randomization
Time to next non-protocol treatment
To estimate and compare the time to next non-protocol treatment (excludes crossover) in each treatment arm.
Time frame: 96 weeks after Step 1 Randomization
SVR35
To estimate and compare the rates of SVR35 at week 48 post-Step 1 randomization by treatment arm and stratified by cross-over-status.
Time frame: 48 weeks after Step 1 Randomization
TI-R
To estimate and compare the rates of TI-R at week 48 post-Step 1 randomization by treatment arm and stratified by cross-over-status.
Time frame: 48 weeks after Step 1 Randomization
Dual Response
To estimate and compare the rates of dual response (SVR35 + TI-R) at week 48 post-Step 1 randomization by treatment arm and stratified by cross-over-status.
Time frame: 48 weeks after Step 1 Randomization
To estimate the frequency of and severity of toxicities in each treatment arm
To estimate and compare the frequency of major anemia response per 2024 IWG-ELN criteria in each treatment arm by week 24 and by week 48 (week 48 stratified by cross-over-status).
Time frame: 48 weeks after Step 1 Randomization
Major anemia response
To estimate and compare the frequency of major anemia response per 2024 IWG-ELN criteria in each treatment arm by week 24 and by week 48 (week 48 stratified by cross-over-status).
Time frame: 48 weeks after Step 1 Randomization
Time to initiation of anemia-directed therapy
To estimate and compare the time to initiation of anemia-directed therapy in each treatment arm among participants not on anemia-directed therapy at registration by week 24 and by week 48 (week 48 stratified by cross-over-status).
Time frame: 48 weeks after Step 1 Randomization