The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if siplizumab can prevent rejection of a kidney transplant in adult participants with end stage kidney disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: How many adverse events do participants receiving two different doses of siplizumab have compared to rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG)? How many participants successfully keep their kidney transplant after receiving siplizumab or rATG? This will be calculated as those participants that did not: die; have their kidney fail to work properly (graft loss); their body rejects their transplant (tissue sample (biopsy)-proven acute rejection: BPAR); or who were lost to follow-up. How does the body respond to siplizumab after dosing at each of the 2 dose levels? How does siplizumab work in the body compared to rATG? Selected participants will be divided into 3 groups. In 2 of the groups, participants will be given siplizumab at one of the two study medicine doses. Participants in the third group will be given rATG. All participants will take the usual anti-rejection medicines given before, during, and after a kidney transplant. All participants will also be given medicines before the study drug to lower the risk of reactions, and medicines used to prevent or treat infections after the transplant. Participants will be asked to provide their medical history at the first visit at the study site where you will have your kidney transplant. At the first visit and other visits participants will be asked to provide their medication history, have a physical exam, check vital signs, have blood drawn for tests, and have non-invasive tests that record the electrical activity of your heart (ECG) and blood draws. Participants will be monitored for 12 months after transplant surgery.
Approximately 120 renal transplant candidates requiring induction therapy will be enrolled 1:1:1 to receive 1 of 2 dose levels of siplizumab or to the comparator rATG. Randomization will be stratified by donor status (living vs donation after brain death vs donation after cardiac death) to ensure similar proportions of donor types in each study arm. All participants will also receive: * A triple regimen (TAC, MPA, and CS) of background immunosuppressive therapy for the duration of the study. * Premedication prior to study treatment infusions. * Infection prophylaxis This clinical trial will evaluate the safety of an anti-cluster of differentiation 2 (CD2) monoclonal antibody, siplizumab, compared to rATG as induction therapy in renal transplant recipients. Following hospital discharge, participants will undergo assessments and procedures as indicated in the protocol through Month 12 or EOS, unless more frequent visits are required per local SoC or for laboratory specimen collection. Safety assessments will include physical examinations, ECGs, vital signs, viral surveillance and monitoring, standard clinical laboratory evaluations completed centrally (hematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis), and AE/SAE monitoring. Final analysis will be performed when all participants have completed 12-month follow-up visits post-transplant or have otherwise ended the trial. This analysis will be performed to evaluate the safety of siplizumab at 2 dose levels compared to rATG.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
120
A non-agonistic, humanized, anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody of the IgG1κ class
An anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin preparation made of purified polyclonal antibodies derived from rabbits
UC Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGTampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGEmory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Michigan - Michigan Medicine
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
RECRUITINGCooperman Barnabus Medical Center
Livingston, New Jersey, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
RECRUITINGAssessment of the safety of 2 dose levels of siplizumab versus rATG.
Number and percentage of participants at 12 months post-transplant experiencing adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and adverse events of special interest (AESIs).
Time frame: 12 months
Assessment of the incidence of composite efficacy failure (defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss-to-follow-up) and their individual components.
* Composite incidence of BPAR, death, graft loss, and loss-to-follow-up. * Incidence of participants who experienced BPAR as defined by central pathology (blinded independent central review using Banff Allograft Pathology Scoring). * Incidence of treated BPAR and steroid-resistant BPAR.
Time frame: 12 months
Assessment of the incidence of composite efficacy failure (defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss-to-follow-up) and their individual components.
• Grade of BPAR.
Time frame: 12 months
Assessment of the incidence of composite efficacy failure (defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss-to-follow-up) and their individual components.
• Severity of BPAR.
Time frame: 12 months
Assessment of the incidence of composite efficacy failure (defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss-to-follow-up) and their individual components.
* Time to first BPAR for each participant. * Time to graft loss for each participant. * Time to death for each participant.
Time frame: 12 months
Assessment of the incidence of composite efficacy failure (defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss-to-follow-up) and their individual components.
* Participant survival at 12 months. * Graft survival at 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
Assessment of the incidence of composite efficacy failure (defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss-to-follow-up) and their individual components.
• Number of participants requiring for-cause renal allograft biopsy assessments over 12 months post-transplant.
Time frame: 12 months
Assessment of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of 2 dose levels of siplizumab.
Siplizumab Cmax (maximum blood concentration) over 12 weeks post-transplant.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Assessment of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of 2 dose levels of siplizumab.
Siplizumab AUC (area under the concentration-time curve) over 12 weeks post-transplant.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Assessment of the pharmacodynamics (PD) of 2 dose levels of siplizumab versus rATG.
Depletion and recovery of lymphocyte count by subset (total lymphocytes; CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells; CD19+ B cells; CD56+ NK cells) over 12 months post-transplant.
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.