This study investigates whether using 3D imaging technology (Cone Beam Computed Tomography or CBCT) for orthodontic treatment planning with aligners can reduce the risk of gingival recession in adult patients seeking dental arch expansion. Many aligner treatments involve expanding the dental arches to address issues like crowding and "black corridors," but this can sometimes lead to gum recession. The research compares two groups of patients: one group will have their treatment planned using CBCT, which allows for detailed 3D visualization of the teeth and bone structure, while the other group will follow a conventional 2D treatment plan. The goal is to see if the 3D tool helps prevent gum recession and other periodontal problems like bone thinning, as well as to assess the impact on other factors like upper airway dimensions. The study is a randomized controlled trial with 40 participants. It will track changes in gum health, bone structure, and airway volume over the course of treatment. The researchers aim to find out if the advanced imaging tool provides significant benefits compared to traditional planning methods.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
40
This intervention involves orthodontic treatment with clear aligners, where the treatment planning is guided by Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). The CBCT data is integrated into the digital planning software to allow 3D visualization of teeth and surrounding bone structures. This enables precise planning of tooth movements within the bony envelope, aiming to reduce the risk of gingival recession and other periodontal complications associated with arch expansion.
Orthodontic treatment planning is traditionally based on two-dimensional radiographs (cephalometric and panoramic), which do not provide information about the three-dimensional position of teeth and their roots within the alveolar bone.
University of Liege
Liège, Liege, Belgium
RECRUITINGChange in total gingival recession severity score (S1 - S0)
The primary endpoint is defined as the difference between the sum of gingival recession severity scores at baseline (S0) and post-treatment (S1). The total score ranges from 0 to 64.
Time frame: Baseline and at completion of treatment (approximately 12 months)
Change in buccal bone dehiscence
Change in buccal bone dehiscence score assessed using CBCT imaging, based on a 5-grade scale (0-4).
Time frame: Baseline and at completion of treatment (approximately 12 months)
Change in keratinized tissue height
Change in keratinized tissue height measured clinically and categorized into 4 grades (0-3).
Time frame: Baseline and at completion of treatment (approximately 12 months)
Change in buccal bone thickness (mm)
Change in buccal bone thickness measured in millimeters using CBCT imaging.
Time frame: Baseline and at completion of treatment (approximately 12 months)
Presence of bone fenestration
Presence or absence of bone fenestration assessed using CBCT imaging (binary outcome: yes/no).
Time frame: Baseline and at completion of treatment (approximately 12 months)
Change in upper airway volume
Change in upper airway volume measured using CBCT imaging and dedicated software analysis.
Time frame: Baseline and at completion of treatment (approximately 12 months)
Change in smallest transverse upper airway dimension
Change in the smallest transverse dimension of the upper airway measured using CBCT imaging.
Time frame: Baseline and at completion of treatment (approximately 12 months)
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score
Change in daytime sleepiness assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale questionnaire.
Time frame: Baseline and at completion of treatment (approximately 12 months)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.