The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether repeated cisplatin-based PIPAC added to standard TC chemotherapy can improve outcomes in women aged 18-75 years with newly diagnosed FIGO IIIB-IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer and visually detectable peritoneal carcinomatosis. The main questions are whether repeated PIPAC increases the rate of complete surgical cytoreduction (CRS R0) and whether it improves disease control, survival outcomes, and safety compared with standard combined treatment including a single PIPAC procedure. Participants will undergo screening, intraoperative randomization, systemic chemotherapy, PIPAC procedures according to study arm, interval cytoreductive surgery, protocol-specified postoperative treatment if needed, and regular follow-up assessments.
Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is frequently accompanied by peritoneal carcinomatosis, which is a major determinant of treatment failure and poor long-term prognosis. Although systemic platinum-taxane chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery remain the foundation of first-line management, outcomes are substantially worse when intraperitoneal tumor burden is high and complete cytoreduction is difficult to achieve. In this setting, additional locoregional treatment strategies may help improve intraperitoneal disease control while preserving the feasibility of multimodal therapy. The present study evaluates pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) as an investigational component of combined first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer with peritoneal dissemination. PIPAC delivers intraperitoneal chemotherapy as a pressurized aerosol during laparoscopy and is intended to enhance spatial distribution and tissue penetration of the drug while limiting systemic exposure. In this protocol, cisplatin-based PIPAC is integrated into the treatment pathway at predefined operative stages together with standard TC systemic chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery. The study is designed as a prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled phase II trial comparing a strategy of repeated PIPAC incorporated across the course of induction and surgical treatment with a comparison strategy in which PIPAC is delivered only once during interval cytoreductive surgery. The protocol also includes further protocol-directed treatment for patients in whom complete cytoreduction is not achieved. At the diagnostic operative stage, disease extent is documented using intra-abdominal assessment including ascites evaluation, mapping of visceral and parietal peritoneal involvement, and calculation of the Peritoneal Cancer Index. Peritoneal, ovarian, and omental tissue samples are obtained for histologic verification and subsequent treatment-response assessment. PIPAC is administered laparoscopically under general anesthesia using cisplatin diluted in normal saline, delivered into a carbon dioxide capnoperitoneum under controlled pressure and flow conditions with a fixed exposure time. Interval cytoreductive surgery is planned after induction treatment, and when indicated, an additional intraoperative PIPAC procedure is performed before abdominal-wall closure. Throughout the study, participants undergo protocol-defined clinical, laboratory, imaging, and pathologic evaluations during treatment and follow-up. Serial reassessment of intraperitoneal disease, biopsy-based morphologic evaluation, tumor-marker monitoring, and adverse-event documentation are used to characterize treatment activity and tolerability over time. Follow-up continues at regular intervals after completion of therapy and includes oncologic surveillance and quality-of-life assessment. Safety oversight includes detailed documentation of adverse events and specific operating-room precautions intended to minimize occupational exposure during aerosolized intraperitoneal chemotherapy procedures. Study conduct, documentation, and confidentiality are governed by protocol-defined data-management procedures and ethical requirements, including written informed consent and ethics committee approval before study initiation and for major protocol amendments. This trial is intended not only to evaluate the clinical contribution of repeated PIPAC in the first-line setting, but also to refine a practical treatment sequence for combining intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, interval surgery, and postoperative management in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
160
Performed laparoscopically under general anesthesia. Drug: cisplatin 30 mg/m² diluted in 180 mL normal saline Administration: * Capnoperitoneum established with carbon dioxide at a target pressure of 12-14 mmHg. * Flow settings depend on nozzle size: No. 150, 0.3-0.4 mL/s; No. 200, 0.7-0.8 mL/s. * Nebulizer selection depends on patient height and body-mass index; tense ascites is evacuated before treatment. * The aerosol flow is directed toward the largest free intraperitoneal space and away from hollow viscera, ligated vessels, and tumor beds. * Exposure time is maintained for exactly 30 minutes. * The abdomen is decompressed without aspirating the cytostatic solution, and no drain is left in place.
Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary
Balashikha, Russia
RECRUITINGRate of complete surgical cytoreduction (CRS R0)
The proportion of participants who achieve complete surgical cytoreduction (CRS R0) at interval cytoreductive surgery.
Time frame: At interval cytoreductive surgery (Visit 4), approximately 9 to 12 weeks after randomization
Overall survival
Time from randomization to death from any cause.
Time frame: From randomization through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment
Progression-free survival
Time from randomization to radiologic, clinical, or pathologic disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: From randomization through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment
Recurrence rate
Proportion of participants with documented disease recurrence after completion of protocol treatment.
Time frame: From completion of treatment through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years Recurrence rate is named among the secondary endpoints.
Time to progression
Time from randomization to first documented disease progression.
Time frame: From randomization through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment
Ascites response
Rate of ascites accumulation during treatment and follow-up, including change in ascites volume over time.
Time frame: During treatment through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment The protocol identifies rate of ascites accumulation as a secondary endpoint and also requires ascites-volume assessment at each operative stage.
Tumor marker response
Proportion of participants with at least a 50% reduction in tumor-marker levels from baseline.
Time frame: During treatment and follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment The protocol specifies the proportion of patients with at least 50% reduction in tumor-marker levels as a secondary endpoint.
Frequency and severity of adverse events
Incidence, type, and severity of adverse events recorded after informed consent, including treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events.
Time frame: From informed consent through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment
Intestinal paresis
Incidence of postoperative intestinal paresis during protocol treatment.
Time frame: During treatment, assessed through completion of treatment Intestinal paresis is specifically listed among the secondary endpoints (assessed up to 6 months)
Laboratory abnormalities
Incidence and severity of clinically significant hematologic and biochemical laboratory abnormalities during protocol treatment.
Time frame: During treatment and follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment Laboratory abnormalities are included in the secondary endpoint list, and laboratory testing is performed repeatedly during treatment and follow-up.
Wound-healing time
Time to postoperative wound healing after protocol-defined surgical procedures.
Time frame: From the date of surgery to complete wound healing, assessed up to 30 days after each study-related surgical procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.