Recording the exact weight and height should represent a standard practice for all inpatients, as they significantly impact on patients' care, drug dosing and nutritional assessment. However, these measurements are recorded in a small percentage of inpatients and, even worse, they often are estimated by nurses or Physicians, or self-reported by patients. This error may contribute to a wrong nutritional assessment, since the body mass index (BMI) is one of the parameters included in some of the most used nutritional scores. In this study the investigators will perform a nutritional assessement, at hospital admission, in a group of inpatients by the mini-nutritional assessment short form (MNA-SF), by means of estimated, self-reported and exact body weight measures. Moreover, in those subjects with a malnutrition diagnosis (by MNA-SF) the investigators will perform bioimpedence analysis and will evaluate a series of anthropometric measurements offering insights into body composition and distribution of fat and muscle, such as calf, waist and hip circumference.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
400
Collection of self-reported weight and height, the exact measurement of weight and height with certified instruments, the administration of the MNA-SF questionnaire and the detection of body circumferences
To assess the impact of discrepancies between estimated weight values reported in the medical record and those exactly measured
Comparison among estimated (by nurses), self-reported (by patients) and exact body weight measures in kilograms (by nurses and physicians).
Time frame: At admission
To assess the impact of discrepancies between estimated height values reported in the medical record and those exactly measured
Comparison among estimated (by nurses), self-reported (by patients) and exact height measures in centimeters (by nurses and physicians).
Time frame: At admission
Differences in MNA-SF scores
Comparison among MNA-SF scores obtained using estimated, self-reported and exact weight measures in kilograms.
Time frame: At admission
Number of patients with a diagnosis of sarcopenia by both bioimpedance and anthropometric analysis
Evaluation of the diagnosis of sarcopenia through the comparison between bioimpedance analysis (measured in %) and anthropometric measurements (calf, hip, waist, measured in cm).
Time frame: At admission
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.