This study investigates whether Kinesio Taping has immediate effects on upper extremity performance in healthy adults and whether these effects may be influenced by placebo mechanisms. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: therapeutic Kinesio Taping, sham Kinesio Taping, or no intervention. All participants complete tests of hand function, including grip strength, typing performance, reaction time, and manual dexterity, before and after a short standardized waiting period. Participants also rate their perceived performance, comfort, and overall change. The purpose of this study is to determine whether improvements in performance are due to the mechanical effects of the tape or related to sensory and expectation-based (placebo) factors.
This study is a single-blind, three-arm randomized controlled trial designed to investigate the immediate effects of Kinesio Taping on upper extremity motor performance and perceived function in healthy adults, and to explore the potential contribution of placebo-related mechanisms. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: therapeutic Kinesio Taping applied with tension, sham Kinesio Taping applied without tension, or a no-intervention control condition. The intervention targets the wrist extensor musculature of the dominant upper extremity. Both taping conditions follow the same application procedure and positioning, differing only in the level of tension to isolate the mechanical versus perceptual effects of the tape. The control group follows the same testing timeline without receiving any intervention. Outcome measures are collected at baseline and immediately after a standardized 20-minute waiting period. Objective measures include maximal grip strength, typing performance, choice reaction time, and manual dexterity. Subjective measures include perceived performance, task ease, comfort, and global rating of change. The study is conducted in a controlled and standardized testing environment with consistent equipment, procedures, and instructions across participants. This design allows for the comparison of objective performance outcomes with subjective perceptions, providing insight into the relationship between mechanical and placebo effects in Kinesio Taping applications.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
36
Elastic therapeutic tape applied to the wrist extensor muscles of the dominant upper extremity using approximately 25% tension according to a standardized application protocol.
Elastic tape applied to the wrist extensor muscles of the dominant upper extremity without tension, using the same placement and procedure as the therapeutic intervention to mimic sensory and procedural aspects without intended therapeutic effect.
Istinye University Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Application and Research Center (ISUFIZYOTEM)
Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Maximal Grip Strength
Maximal grip strength of the dominant hand measured in kilograms using a digital hand dynamometer. The highest value from three trials is recorded.
Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention (within 2-3 minutes after a 20-minute waiting period)
Typing Performance (Corrected Words Per Minute) and Accuracy
Typing speed measured using a standardized computer-based typing task; corrected words per minute calculated by accounting for errors And Typing accuracy measured as the percentage of correct entries during a standardized typing task.
Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention
Choice Reaction Time
Reaction time measured in milliseconds using a computer-based Go/No-Go task, calculated as the mean response time for correct trials.
Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention
Manual Dexterity (Nine-Hole Peg Test)
Fine motor dexterity assessed using the Nine-Hole Peg Test; fastest completion time recorded in seconds.
Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention
Perceived Performance Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Self-reported perceived performance measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no perceived improvement and 100 indicates maximum perceived improvement. Higher scores indicate better perceived performance.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention
Task Ease Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Self-reported task ease measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates much harder, 50 indicates no change, and 100 indicates much easier. Higher scores indicate greater perceived ease of task performance.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention
Comfort Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Self-reported comfort measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates extremely uncomfortable and 100 indicates extremely comfortable. Higher scores indicate greater comfort.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention
Global Rating of Change (GRC)
Participant-reported overall perceived change measured using a 15-point Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale ranging from -7 (vastly worse) to 0 (no change) to +7 (vastly better). Higher scores indicate greater perceived improvement.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention
Abeer Mohamed Abdulla Sayed, BSc (Physiotherapy and Rehabil
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.