Intrathecal Morphine 75 mcg Versus 100 mcg for Post-Cesarean Analgesia: A Randomized Double-blind Trial

Overview

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of two different doses of intrathecal morphine (75 mcg versus 100 mcg) for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Effective postoperative pain control is essential to improve maternal recovery, facilitate early mobilization, and enhance neonatal care. Participants were randomly of assigned to receive either 75 mcg or 100 mcg of intrathecal morphine dose that provides effective analgesia while minimizing adverse effects in the obstetric population.

This prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial was designed to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of two doses of intrathecal morphine (75 mcg versus 100 mcg) in patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. A total of 240 ASA physical status II patients schedule for elective cesarean delivery were enrolled and randomly assigned into two parallel groups. Patients received either 75 mcg or 100 mcg of intrathecal morphine as part of a standardized spinal anesthesia technique using local anesthetic. Randomization was performed using a predefined allocation method, and both patients and outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment. Perioperative management was standardized across both groups to minimize confounding variables. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours following surgery. The primary outcome was VAS pain score at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at earlier time points, requirement for rescue analgesia, incidence of opioid-related adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus), and neonatal outcomes assessed by Apgar scores. The objetive of this study was to determinethe optimal intrathecal morphine dose that provides effective postoperative analgesia while minimizing adverse effects in the obstetric population. The study was conducted in accordance with institutional ethical standards and approved by the corresponding ethics committee.