This study aims to validate a novel real-time algorithm (Presence-IP1.0) designed to detect consciousness from TMS-evoked EEG responses using a reduced electrode montage. Thirty healthy adult participants will undergo TMS-EEG recordings during wakefulness and sleep. The algorithm's ability to differentiate conscious from unconscious states will be evaluated against behavioral and physiological state classification. The goal is to determine whether Presence-IP1.0 achieves clinically useful accuracy for detecting consciousness using a portable, reduced-channel system.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Structural MRI is used to help determine coil placement, before TMS-EEG visit.
novel algorithm
UW School of Medicine and Public Health
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
RECRUITINGAccuracy of Presence-IP1.0 to classify consciousness state (AUC)
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for discriminating conscious versus unconscious states using Presence-IP1.0
Time frame: data collected during experimental sessions (2 visits, up to 8 hours each)
Sensitivity of Presence-IP1.0
Sensitivity will refer to TP/(TP+FN) Where TP is Presence-IP1.0 correctly diagnosing consciousness and FN is Presence-IP1.0 falsely diagnosing unconsciousness.
Time frame: data collected during experimental sessions (2 visits, up to 8 hours each)
Specificity of Presence-IP1.0
Specificity is TN/(TN+FP) Where TN is Presence-IP1.0 correctly diagnosing unconsciousness and FP is Presence-IP1.0 falsely diagnosing consciousness.
Time frame: data collected during experimental sessions (2 visits, up to 8 hours each)
Signal to Noise Ratio
To assess the signal quality of reduced EEG montage, the signal-to-noise ratio will be reported.
Time frame: data collected during experimental sessions (2 visits, up to 8 hours each)
Stability of TMS-evoked responses
To assess the signal quality of reduced EEG montage, the stability of TMS-evoked responses will be reported. This refers to the reproducibility of the TMS response components across the first vs the second half of stimulation runs.
Time frame: data collected during experimental sessions (2 visits, up to 8 hours each)
Agreement with standard high-density EEG metrics (if available
Comparison of average performance of PresenceIP1.0 on the lower-density EEG dataset acquired to this study compared to a reference, previously acquired high-density EEG dataset.
Time frame: data collected during experimental sessions (2 visits, up to 8 hours each)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.