The present study is a phase II/III prospective randomized trial designed to determine whether eliminating of post operative radiotherapy to regional lymphatics in pN0-N1oral cavity is associated with similar treatment outcomes.
Patients of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) undergoing surgery are at risk of local as well as regional failure. Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is often added to radical surgery with intent to reduce loco regional recurrence and improve overall survival in patients with high-risk features. High risk feature include patients with extra capsular extension, positive/ close margins, more than one lymph node involved, pT3 or pT4 primary disease, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI). PORT alone or in combination with concurrent chemotherapy is associated with reductions in loco regional recurrence as well as improvement in overall survival (OS). Benefits associated with PORT often come at the expense of development of significant acute and late morbidities that include dysphagia, mucositis, xerostomia, dermatitis, ototoxicity, fibrosis, dental caries, osteoradionecrosis, change in voice changes, and hypothyroidism. Radiotherapy (RT) portals for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) have traditionally included primary disease plus treatment of bilateral neck. Larger RT treatment volumes generally correlate with increased incidence of radiation induced morbidity .There is potential to reduce radiation morbidity if RT portals can be reduced without compromising treatment outcomes. One such situation is pN0-pN1neck status. However, at present there is no definite consensus as regards to omission of PORT to regional lymphatic's in pN0 -pN1neck and the benefit of omission of PORT largely remains unknown. In a non randomized prospective phase II trial, that eliminated PORT to pN0 necks for patients with locally advanced HNSCC, showed that omitting PORT resulted in excellent control rates in the unirradiated neck. This study included 19% patients with OCSCC. Several retrospective series for OCSCC have reported that RT to tumor bed alone in N0-1 neck is associated with similar treatment outcomes as compared to RT to loco-regional sites.The ongoing PRESERVE study is addressing this question and will generate high level evidence in terms of oncologic outcomes, quality of life and toxicity.The PRESERVE study is a multicentre phase II study randomizing 90 patients with T1-4 N0-2 OCSCC with at least one pN0hemi-neck in a 1:2 ratio between standard RT volumes and omission of RT to the pN0 hemi-neck(s). The Eliminate trial is similar to the PRESERVE study but will exclude patients with PN2-pN3 disease. Unlike the PRESERVE study, the ongoing trial will also consider omission PORT in patients with pN1 disease. A risk of nodal recurrence of 15%-20% has traditionally an indication warrant radiation to a nodal basin. Involvement of two or more nodes is a definite indication for PORT. However, in patients in whom the metastases are limited to a single, ipsilateral positive lymph node not larger than 3 cm (ie, N1), and the routine use of PORT is controversial. In such situations PORT delivery is at discretion of the treating physician. This discrepancy (pN1 status) was also seen in EORTC trial 22931 and RTOG trial 9501criteria for definition of high risk disease. In the EORTC trial 43% of patients enrolled in the trial hadpN0-1 status whereas only 6% of the patients enrolled in the RTOG trial hadpN0-1. The RTOG used the criteria of two or more lymph nodes as indication of PORT whereas in the EORTC trial stage III -IV were one of the criteria for delivery of PORT. There is no prospective study that has considered omission of PORT in pN1OCSCC. Large retrospective series have demonstrated the benefit of PORT for pN1 disease yet there is declining uses of PORT for pN1 OSCC .The ASCO guidelines also do not recommend PORT in pN1 after adequate neck dissection. A recently published study of the National Cancer Database that comprised 1909 OSCC patients with pN1 disease showed a statistically significant survival benefit in favour of PORT (adjusted HR 0.82). The study reported similar benefit in patients with inadequate and adequate neck dissections. In light of this background, the Eliminate trial is designed to test omission of regional RT in pN0-1 neck. The aim of this study is evaluate feasibility of omission of RT to regional lymphatics in pN0/pN1 patients undergoing radical surgery with adequate lymph node dissection for oral cavity HNSCC.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
396
IMRT - adjuvant concurrent CRT/ RT as 66Gy/60 Gy in 33/30 fractions to primary and regional lymphatics
IMRT- adjuvant concurrent CRT/ RT as 66Gy/60 Gy in 33/30 fractions/ Brachytherapy 40-48 Gy in10-12 fractions twice daily at least 6 hours apart, to primary tumor bed only \- elimination of regional lymphatics
Cisplatin is a antineoplastic drug, will be given during the radiation at a dose of 40 mg/m2 weekly to a cumulative dose of at least 200 mg/m2 in case of margin positive disease.
Nci, Aiims
Jhajjar, Haryana, India
RECRUITINGRegional control
Regional control will be assessed as occurrence of any new lesion in the regional /nearby area over time with the help of radiological imaging (CT/MRI/PET-CT) and clinical examination. will be assessed at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Time frame: 2 years
Local control
Local control will assess the recurrence within the primary tumor site at its original location. Radiographic assessment (CT/MRI/PET-CT) at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Time frame: 2 years
Disease free survival
assessed as the length of time that a patient survives without any signs and symptoms of the disease and assessment will be done at every 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Time frame: 2 years
Overall survival
longitudinal assessment every 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Time frame: 2 years
Acute toxicity
Acute toxicity is the side effects that appear within 90 days after the radiation therapy and will be assessed using RTOG acute toxicity scale with grading from 0 to IV where 0 represents no findings and IV being the worst Findings. Higher values wiill be showing worsening of the condition. it will be scored weekly during radiation.
Time frame: 2 years
late toxicity
late toxicity is the side effects that appear after 90 days following the radiation therapy and will be assessed using the Late effects in normal tissues- subjective, objective, management, analytic (LENT SOMA) scale with maximum value of 4 showing very severe / disabling and minimum value of 0 showing no toxicity. Higher values wiill be showing worsening of the condition. longitudinal assessment will be done every 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 2 years
Swallowing function
MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory pre RT, post RT, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Time frame: 2 years
Quality of life EORTC QLQ C30
EORTC QLQC30 module \[longitudinal assessment at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months\] The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. High score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Time frame: 2 years
Quality of life H&N 35
EORTC H\&N 35 module \[longitudinal assessment at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months\] The head \& neck cancer module incorporates seven multi-item scales that assess pain, swallowing, senses (taste and smell), speech, social eating, social contact and sexuality. There are also eleven single items. For all items and scales (maximum score 100 and minimum score 0), high scores indicate more problems (i.e. there are no function scales in which high scores would mean better functioning). The scoring approach for the QLQ-H\&N35 is identical in principle to that for the symptom scales / single items of the QLQ-C30.
Time frame: 2 years