This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study designed to compare the efficacy differences between two treatment sequence-"first-line surufatinib and second-line somatostatin analogs (SSA)" versus "first-line SSA and second-line surufatinib"-in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) from the initiation of first-line therapy to progression on second-line treatment. Secondary endpoints include PFS for each individual line of therapy, safety profiles, and exploration of influencing factors. This study aims to identify the optimal treatment sequence and to provide real-world evidence for optimizing individualized treatment strategies for patients with advanced NETs, thereby informing clinical decision-making in routine practice.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
500
Oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, 250mg or 300mg daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Long-acting release formulation of octreotide or lanreotide, administered via intramuscular or deep subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks until disease progression.
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
PFS
Time frame: From start of first-line treatment (either surufatinib or SSA) to disease progression on second-line treatment, assessed up to 60 months.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.