Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Versus Conventional Injectable Flowable Resin Composite Restorations in Class I Carious Cavities

N/AActive Not RecruitingNCT07535086

Sherifa Ahmed Abdelaziz Kandil120 enrolled

Overview

Investigators will restore carious molar with different restoring materials for comparison

Investigators will evaluate clinical performance of fiber reinforced flowable composite versus injectable flowable composite in carious teeth

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

120

Conditions

Restoration of Posterior Teeth

Interventions

updating experimental version of flowable fiber reinforced bulk fill resin compositeOTHER

dental restorative material

Fiber reinforced flowable resin compositeOTHER

dental restorative material.

light curing deviceDEVICE

device used for curing the resing composite restoration using light

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 40 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * patients having molars with class I carious cavities and vital pulp Exclusion Criteria: * exposed carious molars * severe periodontal problems

Locations (1)

185 Emtedad Ramses 2

Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Clinical performance: marginal integrity , discoloration, fracture

measured using Modified USPHS criteria : measuring score (alpha , bravo , and charlie)

Time frame: baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.