Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are a rare and heterogeneous group of extranidal T-cell lymphomas characterized by skin involvement. Current treatment options for CTCL are limited. Although responses have been demonstrated, their duration is often short, especially in patients with advanced stage disease. Additional treatment options are needed which demonstrate activity in cutaneous and extracutaneous sites. The traditional CHOP regimen (Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxydaunorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisone) has some efficacy for CTCL patients, but due to the cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines, patients can only receive a limited course of treatment. After stopping the regimen, most patients will experience relapse. Aclarubicin, also known as aclacinomycin A, is an anthracycline type of antibiotic with significant anti-cancer properties. Previous studies have shown that aclarubicin only induces histone eviction without causing DNA damage, and it stands out in pre-clinical models and clinical studies, as it potently kills AML cells. Meanwhile, aclarubicin lacks cardiotoxicity, and can be safely administered even after the maximum cumulative dose of either doxorubicin or idarubicin has been reached. Aclarubicin's treatment indications include malignant lymphoma, but actual clinical application experience is limited. The purpose of this study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose, safety and efficacy of aclarubicin combined with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CAOP) for subjects with relapsed or refractory CTCL.
The estimated incidence of CTCL in China is 6.9 per million, accounting for 75% to 80% of primary cutaneous lymphomas. CTCL has diverse subtypes, stages, and clinical manifestations, with mycosis fungoides (MF) being the most common subtype. The etiology of CTCL remains unclear, but it may be related to DNA damage, epigenetic regulation, programmed cell death, and abnormalities in the T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling pathway. The diagnosis and classification of CTCL primarily refer to the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasms. A definitive diagnosis requires a comprehensive assessment of the patient's clinical presentation, histopathological findings, immunohistochemical staining, and TCR gene rearrangement testing. Sézary syndrome (SS) is no longer classified as CTCL in 5th edition of the WHO Classification. However, due to its close association with MF, current treatment recommendations still do not separate SS from MF. Early skin manifestations of CTCL include patchy or plaque-like lesions. Advanced stages may develop tumors or erythroderma. Extracutaneous involvement may also occur, often with regional lymph node involvement and the presence of atypical lymphocytes in the peripheral blood. Prognostic factors for CTCL include the presence of extracutaneous involvement, the body surface area of affected skin, the type of skin lesion, and the pathological type. Currently, disease staging and treatment efficacy assessment are primarily based on the 2022 ISCL/USCC/EORTC recommended criteria. Commonly used systemic therapies for CTCL include interferon α, oral retinoids, histone deacetylase inhibitors, CD30 antibody-drug conjugates (velutuximab), and CCR4 monoclonal antibodies (moglizumab). The global Phase III MAVORIC study of moglizumab demonstrated a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.7 months and a median time to next treatment (TTNT) of 11 months in adult patients with relapsed/refractory SS or stage III-IV MF. The objective response rate (ORR) in hematology was 68%, and the ORR in skin reached 42%. However, due to cost and accessibility, clinical application in China remains limited. For patients who have failed these systemic therapies, existing combination chemotherapy regimens, while effective, are limited by patient tolerance, toxicity, and comorbidities, making continued use difficult. Aclarubicin (Acla) is an anthracycline anticancer drug. In vitro, Acla has demonstrated potent cytotoxicity against various lymphoma and T-lymphocytic leukemia cell lines. Mechanistic studies of anthracyclines have revealed that doxorubicin, epirubicin, daunorubicin, and idarubicin all induce tumor cell apoptosis through two mechanisms: 1. DNA damage: through inhibition of topoisomerase II (Topo II), leading to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs); and 2. Chromatin damage: through histone removal, causing chromatin alterations at specific genomic loci. However, these dual mechanisms also lead to dose-dependent, irreversible cardiotoxicity. Compared with classic anthracyclines (such as doxorubicin and daunorubicin), Acla does not cause DNA damage and accumulates significantly in lymphoid tissues (spleen, thymus, and lymph nodes), with poor distribution to other tissues. Consequently, its cardiotoxicity is significantly reduced. Even at high cumulative doses, it is less likely to cause cardiac dysfunction. Therefore, Acla may offer a safer option for elderly patients or those with concomitant heart disease. Previous studies have shown that the combination of Acla and cytarabine (such as the CAG regimen) has some efficacy and is well tolerated in relapsed/refractory and elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. In the 1980s and 1990s, studies explored the use of Acla in chemotherapy regimens for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma, demonstrating some activity. Small studies have shown that Acla monotherapy can achieve a response rate of approximately 30% in patients with advanced non-hedging lymphoma, without compromising cardiac function. Japanese researchers have found that combination chemotherapy regimens containing Acla in T-cell lymphomas exhibit superior efficacy. In this study, the investigators will replace doxorubicin in the traditional CHOP regimen with aclarubicin, a drug with proven efficacy and low cardiotoxicity, to create a novel aclarubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CAOP) regimen for patients with relapsed/refractory CTCL and SS who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. This combination chemotherapy regimen may improve efficacy while balancing tolerability and safety, providing a new treatment option for elderly patients with CTCL.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
37
Cycle 1-6: Phase I starting dose 20mg/m\^2/D, D1-2 (dose group 1), D1-3 (dose group 2), D1-4 (dose group 3), QD, ivgtt The Phase II dose was determined based on the Phase I results Cycle 7-10: Phase I starting dose 20mg/ m\^2/D, D1-2 (dose group 1), D1-3 (dose group 2), D1-4 (dose group 3), QD, ivgtt The Phase II dose was determined based on the Phase I results
Cycle 1-6 750 mg/m\^2, D1, QD, ivgtt Cycle 7-10 750 mg/m\^2, D1, QD, ivgtt
Cycle 1-6 1.4 mg/m\^2, D1 (maximum 2mg/d), QD, iv Cycle 7-10 1.4 mg/m\^2, D1 (maximum 2mg/d), QD, iv
Cycle 1-6 60 mg/m\^2, D1-5 (maximum 100mg/d), QD, Po Cycle 7-10 60 mg/m\^2, D1-5 (maximum 100mg/d), QD, Po
Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai
Shanghai, China
Ruijin Hospital Wuxi Branch
Wuxi, China
Maximum tolerated dose (MTD)
MTD for aclarubicin (primary outcome measure of phase I)
Time frame: 28 days after first dose of aclarubicin
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
RP2D for aclarubicin (primary outcome measure of phase I)
Time frame: 28 days after first dose of aclarubicin
Objective response rate (ORR)
Proportion of patients who achieved complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) after treatment (primary outcome measure of phase II)
Time frame: At the end of induction cycle 6 (each cycle is about 28 days)
Objective response rate (ORR)
Proportion of patients who achieved complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) after treatment (secondary outcome measure of phase I)
Time frame: At the end of induction cycle 6 (each cycle is about 28 days)
Progression Free Survival
Time from enrollment to confirmation of disease progression or death from any cause (secondary outcome measure of phase II)
Time frame: All enrolled patients were followed up for at least 12 months or had an event
Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)
The interval from commencement of one treatment to initiation of the next line of therapy (secondary outcome measure of phase II)
Time frame: All enrolled patients were followed up for at least 12 months or had an event
Adverse Events
Adverse Events (CTCAE v6.0), Vital Signs and Physical Examination, ECOG, Clinical Laboratory Tests, Electrocardiogram (ECG), Echocardiography, Cardiac Enzyme Profile
Time frame: From enrollment to 28 days after the end of treatment
Change in quality of life as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) global health status score
Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The global health status score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Scores will be calculated according to the EORTC scoring manual and summarized as change from baseline.
Time frame: From enrollment to 28 days after the end of treatment
Cancer-related fatigue as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue score
Cancer-related fatigue will be assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue questionnaire. Scores are reported as T-scores standardized to a reference population, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue (worse outcome). Changes from baseline will be summarized.
Time frame: From enrollment to 28 days after the end of treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.