Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a heterogeneous group of rare disorders that result from clonal proliferation of mature post-thymic lymphocytes. These T-cell neoplasms account for approximately 10-15% of all lymphomas. The most common subtype of PTCL is classified as "not otherwise specified" (NOS) which accounts for 30-40%. PTCLs have been treated similarly with CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxydaunorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisone), often with etoposide (CHOEP), followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first remission. However, \<50% of the patients are cured with CHOP alone, and the progression-free survival rates at 5 years are as low as 20% for PTCLs. Meanwhile, for elderly patients who can't endure CHOPE and proceed ASCT, the long-term survival is even worse. Aclarubicin is an anthracycline which showed good safety profile in the treatment of both myeloid and lymphocytic leukemia. Previous studies have shown that aclarubicin only induces histone eviction without causing DNA damage, and it stands out in pre-clinical models and clinical studies, as it potently kills AML cells. Meanwhile, aclarubicin lacks cardiotoxicity, and can be safely administered even after the maximum cumulative dose of either doxorubicin or idarubicin has been reached. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of Aclarubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (CAOP) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed PTCLs. The investigators hope to try to replace doxorubicin in CHOP with aclarubicin, which is less toxic, without reducing the efficacy of patients while ensuring safety.
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a rare and highly heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies, belonging to the T-cell tumor category of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Compared to B-cell tumors, current understanding of T-cell leukemia and lymphoma remains relatively underdeveloped, and a significant proportion of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Therefore, PTCL patients have not experienced the same level of prognostic improvement over the past 20 to 30 years. In recent years, however, with a deeper understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of PTCLs and the approval of numerous new drugs (including various epigenetic modifiers and biologics), the prognosis for T-cell lymphoma patients may be further improved. Although histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, EZH2 inhibitors, and demethylating agents have made some progress in clinical research on PTCLs, their clinical application still relies heavily on CHOP-based chemotherapy regimens. A study of 239 patients with localized nodular PTCL showed that among patients receiving CHOP-like therapy ± radiotherapy, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 58%, and the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 53%. Multivariate analysis indicated that age ≥60 years and presence of B symptoms at onset were poor prognostic factors, while ALK-positive anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma had a better prognosis. Therefore, for elderly PTCL patients, there is an urgent need to find a low-toxicity, tolerable, and effective basic chemotherapy regimen. Aclarubicin (Acla) is an anthracycline anticancer drug. In vitro, Acla has demonstrated potent cytotoxicity against various lymphoma and T-lymphocytic leukemia cell lines. Mechanistic studies of anthracyclines have revealed that doxorubicin, epirubicin, daunorubicin, and idarubicin all induce tumor cell apoptosis through two mechanisms: 1. DNA damage: through inhibition of topoisomerase II (Topo II), leading to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs); and 2. Chromatin damage: through histone removal, causing chromatin alterations at specific genomic loci. However, these dual mechanisms also lead to dose-dependent, irreversible cardiotoxicity. Compared with classic anthracyclines (such as doxorubicin and daunorubicin), Acla does not cause DNA damage and accumulates significantly in lymphoid tissues (spleen, thymus, and lymph nodes), with poor distribution to other tissues. Consequently, its cardiotoxicity is significantly reduced. Even at high cumulative doses, it is less likely to cause cardiac dysfunction. Therefore, Acla may offer a safer option for elderly patients or those with concomitant heart disease. Previous studies have shown that the combination of Acla and cytarabine (such as the CAG regimen) has some efficacy and is well tolerated in relapsed/refractory and elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. In the 1980s and 1990s, studies explored the use of Acla in chemotherapy regimens for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma, demonstrating some activity. Small studies have shown that Acla monotherapy can achieve a response rate of approximately 30% in patients with advanced non-hedging lymphoma, without compromising cardiac function. Japanese researchers have found that combination chemotherapy regimens containing Acla in T-cell lymphomas exhibit superior efficacy. In this study, the investigators will replace doxorubicin in the traditional CHOP regimen with aclarubicin, which has good efficacy and low cardiotoxicity, to create a novel CAOP (aclarubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone) regimen for elderly patients newly diagnosed with PTCL. This combination chemotherapy regimen may improve efficacy while also considering tolerability and safety, providing a new treatment option for elderly patients with PTCLs.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
36
20mg/m\^2/D, D1-4, QD, ivgtt
750 mg/m\^2, D1, ivgtt
1.4 mg/m\^2, D1 (maximum 2mg/d), IV
60 mg/m\^2, D1-5 (maximum 100mg/d), Po
Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai
Shanghai, China
Ruijin Hospital Wuxi Branch
Wuxi, China
Complete remission rate (CR)
Proportion of enrolled subjects who achieved CR after receiving up to 6 cycles of the CAOP regimen
Time frame: After a maximum of 6 cycles of CAOP regimen (each cycle is 28 days)
Progression Free Survival
The time from enrollment to confirmed disease progression or death from any cause.
Time frame: Maximum follow-up period is 2 years after the end of treatment.
Overall Survival
The time from enrollment to death from any cause.
Time frame: maximum follow-up period is 2 years after the end of treatment.
Adverse Events
Adverse Events (CTCAE v6.0), Vital Signs and Physical Examination, ECOG, Clinical Laboratory Tests, Electrocardiogram (ECG), Echocardiography, Cardiac Enzyme Profile
Time frame: From enrollment to 28 days after the end of treatment
Change in quality of life as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) global health status score
Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The global health status score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Scores will be calculated according to the EORTC scoring manual and summarized as change from baseline.
Time frame: From enrollment to 28 days after the end of treatment
Cancer-related fatigue as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue score
Cancer-related fatigue will be assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue questionnaire. Scores are reported as T-scores standardized to a reference population, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue (worse outcome). Changes from baseline will be summarized.
Time frame: From enrollment to 28 days after the end of treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.