COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THERAPY AND TIBIAL NERVE STIMULATION IN URGE URINARY INCONTINENCE

Overview

Urge urinary incontinence is a prevalent condition characterized by involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by a sudden, compelling urge to void. It significantly impairs quality of life and is associated with substantial physical, psychological, and social burden. Noninvasive treatment modalities, including pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy and posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), have gained attention due to their safety and ease of application. This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded clinical trial conducted in women diagnosed with urge urinary incontinence. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups: PEMF therapy or tibial nerve stimulation. Both interventions will be applied over a predefined treatment period under standardized conditions. Outcome measures will include symptom severity, frequency of incontinence episodes, and quality of life, assessed using validated instruments such as the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), bladder diaries, and quality-of-life scales. Assessments will be performed at baseline and after completion of the treatment period. The primary aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of PEMF therapy and tibial nerve stimulation in reducing urinary symptoms. Secondary objectives include evaluating improvements in quality of life and functional outcomes. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the optimization of noninvasive treatment strategies for urge urinary incontinence.

This study is designed as a two-arm, parallel-group, prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded clinical trial. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy group or the tibial nerve stimulation group. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated simple randomization method. The outcome assessor will be blinded to group allocation to minimize assessment bias. Both treatment modalities are noninvasive and commonly used in the management of urge urinary incontinence. Treatment allocation will be determined solely by randomization rather than clinical indication, as the primary aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of these two interventions. Therefore, no participant will be deprived of standard care. A total of 40 female patients will be included in the study, with 20 participants in each group. Only women aged between 18 and 65 years will be recruited to ensure a homogeneous sample and to account for anatomical and physiological differences in the pelvic floor. Both groups will receive a standardized pelvic floor exercise program in addition to their assigned treatment. The treatment duration will be 6 weeks, consisting of 18 sessions in total. During the first 2 weeks, treatments will be administered 5 days per week, followed by 2 sessions per week for the remaining 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure will be the change in the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) total score. Assessments will be performed at baseline (pre-treatment), at the end of treatment (6th week), and at the 10th-week follow-up. A validated Turkish version of the questionnaire will be used, and all assessments will be conducted by an independent blinded evaluator. Secondary outcome measures will include changes in the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) total and subscale scores, assessed at the same time points (baseline, post-treatment, and 10th-week follow-up) using the validated Turkish version. Additionally, participants will complete a 3-day bladder diary at each assessment point. The following parameters will be recorded: Daily voiding frequency Number of urgency episodes Number of urinary incontinence episodes Nocturia frequency Daily pad usage Treatment adherence will be evaluated based on the completion rate of the planned 18 sessions and the number of missed sessions. Safety will be assessed by recording any adverse events occurring during the treatment period.