Pea Fibre in Hemodialysis

Overview

Background and problem Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects a large share of adults worldwide and is a growing public-health concern. People with advanced CKD can develop "uremia", a dangerous build-up of waste products in the blood that the failing kidneys cannot remove. Even when patients receive regular dialysis, many so-called "uremic toxins" remain in the body because some of these substances bind tightly to blood proteins and are poorly removed by dialysis. Over 100 uremic toxins have been identified and classified and protein-bound toxins such as Indoxylsulfate and p-Cresylsulfate are especially difficult to clear by dialysis. Some uremic toxins are linked to heart and blood-vessel disease, inflammation, and worse outcomes in dialysis patients. For example, Indoxylsulfate has been associated with higher mortality, vascular calcification, vessel stiffness and heart failure. Reducing these toxins might therefore improve quality of life and lower cardiovascular risk in people on dialysis. Purpose of the study The study will test whether adding inner, fermentable pea fiber (a natural prebiotic) to the daily diet of hemodialysis patients can lower blood levels of uremic toxins-especially Indoxylsulfate-and improve related markers of inflammation and cardiovascular risk. The investigators hypothesize that fermentable fibers change gut bacterial composition so that less toxin-forming bacterial metabolism (from amino acids like tryptophan) occurs, thereby reducing the amount of harmful metabolites that reach the blood. Type of study: Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with two groups. Duration: 8 weeks of intervention. Intervention: Participants will receive daily baked goods (bread, rolls, muffins, scones, pizza bread) that together provide 20 g of pea fiber per day; the control group will receive identical foods without added pea fiber. The fiber mix uses commercially available inner pea-fiber products. Blood and stool sampling: Blood samples are taken before the intervention, at 4 weeks and at 8 weeks to measure Indoxylsulfate and other toxins, inflammation markers, vitamin D metabolites and cardiovascular risk markers. A subgroup will also provide stool samples to study changes in the gut microbiome. Who can join Adults aged 18-89 who have been on chronic hemodialysis for at least three months and receive dialysis two to three times per week are eligible. The study excludes people with recent serious infections, advanced liver disease, active cancer, recent blood transfusion, pregnancy, certain food intolerances or inability to consent. Each study arm will include 36 participants. Primary and secondary outcomes Primary outcome: Change in blood Indoxylsulfate concentration between the pea-fiber group and the control group. Secondary outcomes: Levels of other uremic toxins, routine kidney-related blood tests (creatinine, urea, uric acid), electrolytes, vitamin D metabolites, inflammatory markers, lipid markers, FGF23, short-chain fatty acids, sKlotho, and the effect of patient serum on cytokine production in a standard immune cell line. Stool analyses in a subgroup will examine shifts in bacterial groups and metabolic networks. How the intervention is delivered and monitored Foods are prepared in a certified bakery and coded so neither participants nor study staff know who receives pea fiber or placebo. To improve adherence, participants choose from a variety of pre-portioned baked items and are advised to spread intake across the day. Unused portions are returned and logged. Dietary recalls and symptom questionnaires are collected to monitor changes in overall diet, appetite and gastrointestinal side effects. Blood draws are timed before dialysis after the long interdialytic interval to standardize measurements. Potential impact and limitations If fermentable inner pea fibers lower Indoxylsulfate and related toxins, this would support a simple, food-based strategy to reduce toxin burden and possibly cardiovascular risk in dialysis patients. However, previous studies show mixed results depending on the type of fiber used: fermentable fibers (like amylose-rich starch or inulin) have produced beneficial changes in some trials, while non-fermentable fibers did not. Since evidence high-quality randomized trials in dialysis patients is still limited there is the need for this study.