This study evaluates the operational, environmental, and habitation-system requirements for sustained human presence on the lunar surface, the performance of the Lunar Gateway as a transit and staging architecture, and the pathways required to accelerate readiness for Martian surface habitation. The protocol examines habitat resilience, radiation exposure modeling, life-support continuity, EVA logistics, behavioral health in isolated environments, and systems-engineering workflows across lunar, transit, and Mars-analog environments. Special emphasis is placed on the identification, extraction, processing, and utilization of lunar water-ice deposits as a critical resource for life-support, radiation shielding, and in-situ propellant production. Findings will inform future mission design, habitation module development, and interplanetary operational frameworks.
This multiphase observational and operational protocol investigates the habitation lifecycle across three mission environments: (1) lunar surface habitation systems, (2) Lunar Gateway transit architecture, and (3) Martian surface analog habitats. The study integrates engineering, environmental, behavioral, and operational assessments to characterize requirements for long-duration human habitation beyond Earth orbit, with a specific focus on the role of water-ice resources in sustaining habitation and enabling interplanetary logistics. The lunar surface phase evaluates habitat stability, environmental control and life-support system (ECLSS) resilience, radiation shielding performance, EVA logistics, mobility constraints, and dust mitigation strategies. A central component of this phase is the assessment of lunar water-ice availability, extraction feasibility, thermal stability, and processing pathways. Water-ice is evaluated as a source for potable water, oxygen generation, hydrogen production, and in-situ propellant manufacturing. Operational workflows, redundancy models, and failure-mode responses are analyzed to determine the feasibility of sustained lunar habitation supported by local resource utilization. The Lunar Gateway phase examines transit-architecture performance, including docking operations, crew systems behavior, resource transfer workflows, and the continuity of life-support and environmental systems during transit. The study evaluates how water-ice-derived consumables from the lunar surface could be staged, processed, or transferred through the Gateway to support outbound missions. Behavioral health observations and operational stressors are assessed to understand crew performance in confined transit environments. The Martian surface analog phase focuses on long-duration isolation, dust intrusion mitigation, power redundancy, habitat resilience, and environmental stability under Mars-analog conditions. This phase evaluates the translational pathways required to accelerate readiness for Martian habitation, including the potential use of Martian subsurface ice deposits for life-support, radiation shielding, and fuel production. Comparisons between lunar and Martian ice-resource utilization inform cross-environment operational strategies. Across all phases, the protocol collects operational, environmental, and systems-engineering data to inform future mission architectures, habitation module design, and interplanetary habitation strategies. The study does not involve FDA-regulated products, biomedical interventions, or human subjects research as defined by federal regulations. All activities occur within controlled operational and engineering environments.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
30
Operational assessment of habitat modules, environmental stability, ECLSS resilience, redundancy models, and failure-mode responses across lunar, transit, and Mars-analog environments.
Evaluation of water-ice identification, extraction, thermal stability, processing, and conversion into potable water, oxygen, hydrogen, and in-situ propellant.
Testing of EVA logistics, mobility constraints, dust mitigation strategies, and operational workflows in lunar and Mars-analog environments.
Truway Health, Inc. New York Headquarters
New York, New York, United States
Habitat System Resilience Index (HSRI)
HSRI is a composite scale (0-100) assessing environmental stability, ECLSS uptime (%), redundancy activation success rate (%), and mean time to recovery (hours). Higher scores indicate better habitat resilience.
Time frame: 36 months
Water-Ice Utilization Efficiency Ratio
Efficiency ratio (%) measured using the Water-Ice Processing Performance Scale (WIPPS; 0-100%), quantifying the proportion of extracted ice converted into usable water, oxygen, hydrogen, and propellant. Higher values indicate greater efficiency.
Time frame: 36 months
Radiation Modeling Accuracy Score
Accuracy score (%) comparing predicted radiation dose (mSv) to measured dose using the Habitat Radiation Monitoring System (HRMS). Higher scores indicate greater predictive accuracy.
Time frame: 36 months
EVA Task Completion Time
Measured in minutes using standardized EVA Task Battery (ETB). Lower values indicate better performance.
Time frame: 36 months
EVA Mobility Constraint Score
Assessed using the EVA Mobility Scale (0-10). Higher scores indicate greater mobility.
Time frame: 36 months
Dust Intrusion Index
Measured using the Dust Intrusion Quantification Protocol (DIQP; 0-100). Lower scores indicate better dust mitigation.
Time frame: 36 months
Life-Support Continuity Score (LSCS)
LSCS (0-100%) measures uninterrupted ECLSS uptime and recovery time following system faults using the ECLSS Continuity Monitoring Tool (ECMT). Higher scores indicate better continuity.
Time frame: 36 months
Behavioral Health Stability Index (BHSI)
BHSI (0-100) assessed using the Long-Duration Behavioral Stability Scale (LDBSS). Higher scores indicate greater psychological and operational stability.
Time frame: 36 months
Power System Uptime Percentage
Measured using the Power System Monitoring Suite (PSMS). Higher values indicate better uptime.
Time frame: 36 months
Redundancy Activation Success Rate
Measured as % of successful automatic or manual redundancy activations.
Time frame: 36 months
Power Recovery Time
Measured in minutes from disruption to full restoration.
Time frame: 36 months
Particulate Intrusion Reduction Score
Measured using the Particulate Intrusion Scale (0-100). Higher scores indicate better reduction.
Time frame: 36 months
Abrasion Resistance Index
Measured using the Surface Abrasion Test Protocol (SATP; 0-10). Higher scores indicate better resistance.
Time frame: 36 months
Operational Degradation Rate
Measured as % decline in system performance over time. Lower values indicate better performance.
Time frame: 36 months
Transit-to-Surface Operational Continuity Score (TSOCS)
TSOCS (0-100) measured using the Operational Continuity Assessment Tool (OCAT), evaluating workflow stability during transitions between Gateway, lunar surface, and Mars-analog environments. Higher scores indicate better continuity.
Time frame: 36 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.