Providing care to individuals with serious mental illness can be challenging, requiring ongoing monitoring, treatment adjustments, and coordination of various medical and social services. Rates of emergency service and hospital use are high due to unexpected social, medical, and mental health crises. Stressors and poor adherence with treatment are common and can lead to rapid worsening in symptoms, job loss, homelessness, incarceration, or suicide. Clinician visits can be infrequent. Patient-clinician contact between visits is challenging and often nonexistent. As such, illness exacerbations usually occur with no clinician awareness in real time, leaving limited opportunity to provide services. Clinicians need interventions that are capable of monitoring and quickly detecting worsening behaviors and illness, to improve care coordination, outreach, and treatment. This project studies the effectiveness of enhanced care coordination using passive mobile data monitoring and support from peer specialists, with the goal of improving outcomes and reducing the need for acute care.
Overview: Providing care to individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) can be challenging, requiring ongoing monitoring, treatment adjustments, and coordination of various medical and social services. Rates of emergency service and hospital use are high due to unexpected social, medical, and mental health crises. A variety of stressors and poor adherence with treatment are common and can lead to rapid worsening in symptoms, job loss, homelessness, incarceration, or suicide. Clinician visits can be infrequent. Patient-clinician contact between visits is challenging and often nonexistent. As such, illness exacerbations usually occur with no clinician awareness in real time, leaving limited opportunity to provide services. This project studies, in Veterans with SMI and high risk for acute care, the effectiveness of an enhanced care coordination mobile intervention (CCM) that uses passive mobile data and support from peer coaches. The investigators hypothesize that CCM will reduce the need for acute care services in comparison to usual care. Specific Aims: Among Veterans with SMI: 1. Engage Veterans and clinicians in co-design activities that adapt previously tested protocols and tools to guide implementation of enhanced care coordination with mobile (CCM intervention) that includes passive mobile monitoring of Veterans' mental health status, technology and behavioral supports from peer coaches, and care coordination within a Behavioral Health Interdisciplinary Program (BHIP). 2. Determine the effectiveness of CCM on acute care use. Implement CCM using protocols and tools from Aim 1 and randomize high-risk patients with SMI to CCM or usual care for 9 months. 3. Evaluate implementation of CCM. 4. Conduct a budget impact analysis of CCM. Methodology: Population: patients with SMI and high risk for acute care use. Intervention: enhanced care coordination within a VA BHIP program using passive mobile monitoring and supports from peer coaches Comparison: effectiveness trial with randomization to CCM or usual care for 9 months Outcome: reduction in use of urgent care services (emergency visits, hospitalization, or death) Qualitative and quantitative methods
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
400
Mobile monitoring, peer coaching, and enhanced care coordination
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA
West Los Angeles, California, United States
RECRUITINGCorporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
RECRUITINGAcute care utilization
Use of emergency service, use of hospitals, and death are each a binary measure (yes/no). These will be combined to make one binary measure that is yes if any one of these three is yes, and otherwise no.
Time frame: 9 months
Interpersonal supports - Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL)
Level of social support measured using the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-12 (ISEL). Scores can range from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: 9 months
Patient activation - Patient Activation Measure (PAM)
Patient activation measured using the short-form Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13). Scores can range from 13 to 52, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: 9 months
Engagement with care - Working Alliance Inventory (WAI)
Engagement with care measured using the Working Alliance Inventory for General Practice (WAI-GP). Scores can range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: 9 months
Receipt of care appropriate for chronic conditions - Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC)
Receipt of care appropriate for chronic conditions measured using the 20-item Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Scores can range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: 9 months
Care experience - Ambulatory Care Experiences Survey (ACES)
Care experience measured using the Ambulatory Care Experiences Survey (ACES) Short Form. Scores can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: 9 months
Psychiatric symptoms - Behavior And Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-24)
Psychiatric symptoms measured using the Behavior And Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-24). Scores can range from 0 to 96, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Time frame: 9 months
Quality of life - Veterans RAND 12 item Health Survey (VR-12)
Health-related quality of life measured using the Veterans RAND 12 item Health Survey (VR-12). Scores can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: 9 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.