this study used to compare efficacy between platelet rich plasma periurethral injection versus mid urethral sling ( trans obturator tape ) in treatment of stress urinary incontinence
stress urinary incontinence classified in urodynamic study according to Valsalva leak point pressure to intrinsic sphincteric muscle weakness best treated by PRP periurethral injection and VLPP is less than or equal 60cmH2O and MUCP less than 20cmH2O(21 ) patients enrolled in this group , while hypermobile urethra identified by VLPP is high more than 90cmh2O best treated by trans obturator tape(21) patients recruited in this group , mode of preparation of PRP is by withdrawing 15 ml blood and placed in falcon tube with ACD ( acid citrate dextrose) added centrifuged first at 800 RPM and then the supernatant removed and re-centrifuged again at 3500 RPM and then injected periurethral by 5cc syringe with 30G needle after applying 2% lidocaine ,patient assessed at one and three month objectively by cough stress test and subjectively by ICIQ questionnaire and presence of any adverse effect
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
42
GROUP 1 : 21patient will have platelet rich plasma injected periurethral in intrinsic muscle weakness in stress urinary incontinence
GROUP 2 : (21) patient having SUI due to hypermobile urethra will have TOT
Ainshams university maternity hospital
Cairo, Abbassyia, Egypt
objective assessment of urinary leakage through cough stress test
Time frame: after one and three months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.