This study aims to compare the trueness and precision of three impression methodologies photogrammetry, digital intraoral scanning with splinted scan bodies, and conventional open tray impressions in the context of the All-on-X treatment concept. This will provide valuable evidence for clinicians considering digital workflows for implant-supported prostheses. Does the use of photogrammetry and digital impression techniques with splinted scan bodies result in improved accuracy in implant position transfer in the All-on-X concept compared to conventional open tray impressions?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
11
use of photogrammetry system to capture the positions of All on X implants digitally without physical impression material. This technique aims to achieve precise measurements and increase patient satisfaction
Digital full-arch impression using splinted scan bodies connected with resin to enhance stability. An intraoral scanner captures the splinted assembly for framework fabrication. Accuracy and patient satisfaction will be evaluated.
Traditional full-arch open-tray impression using polyether or VPS material with splinted impression copings. This serves as the standard comparator for evaluating accuracy and patient satisfaction.
October 6 University
Giza, Egypt
Accuracy measured using 3D inspection software (Geomagic Control X).
Time frame: Immediately after measurements taking
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), assessed using standardized questionnaires.
Time frame: immediately after measurements taking
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.