This study is a prospective, multicenter, real-world observational study. It aims to evaluate whether adding plasma device therapy to standard wound care is effective and safe for treating different types of wounds, including acute wounds (such as burns and surgical incisions), chronic wounds (such as diabetic foot ulcers and pressure injuries), post-grafting wounds, and sutured wounds. A total of 500 patients receiving standard wound care plus plasma therapy will be enrolled from multiple hospitals across China. Their outcomes will be compared with 500 matched patients who received standard wound care alone. The main outcomes include wound healing rate at 4 weeks, time to complete wound closure, pain relief, scar formation, and any side effects. Patients will be followed for up to 6 months.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,000
Cold atmospheric plasma device used for non-contact wound treatment. The device generates low-temperature plasma with broad-spectrum antibacterial properties, promoting cell proliferation, modulating inflammation, and improving local microcirculation.
Complete Wound Healing Rate at 4 Weeks
Proportion of wounds (acute wounds, post-grafting wounds, and sutured wounds) achieving complete epithelialization without drainage at 4 weeks post-treatment.
Time frame: 4 weeks after enrollment
Proportion of Wounds Achieving ≥50% Area Reduction at 4 Weeks
For chronic wounds (diabetic foot ulcers, pressure injuries, venous ulcers, radiation ulcers, etc.), the proportion of wounds showing a reduction in wound area of 50% or more compared to baseline at 4 weeks.
Time frame: 4 weeks after enrollment
Time to Complete Wound Healing
Number of days from initial treatment to complete wound closure (100% re-epithelialization).
Time frame: From enrollment to complete epithelialization, assessed up to 6 months
Change in Pain Score (VAS)
Pain intensity is measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Scores range from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse pain (0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain).
Time frame: Baseline, day 3, day 7, day 14, day 21, day 28
Change in Pain Relief/Satisfaction (ASA)
Pain relief and satisfaction are measured using the Analog Scale of Appreciation (ASA). Scores range from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate better pain relief or greater satisfaction (0 = no appreciation/relief, 10 = complete appreciation/relief).
Time frame: Baseline, day 3, day 7, day 14, day 21, day 28
Wound Area Reduction Rate
Percentage reduction in wound area calculated as (baseline area - current area) / baseline area × 100%.
Time frame: Day 7, day 14, day 28
Scar Assessment
Scar quality is evaluated using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) , which assesses vascularity, pigmentation, pliability, and height. The total score ranges from 0 to 13, with higher scores indicating worse scar quality (e.g., greater vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, and reduced pliability).
Time frame: Month 1, month 3, month 6
Wound Recurrence Rate
6 months after enrollment
Time frame: Proportion of participants experiencing recurrence of a wound at the same anatomical site within 6 months after complete healing.
Functional Recovery - Local Sensory Function
Local sensory function of the healed wound area is assessed by sensory testing. Unit of Measure: Present vs. absent (or reduced) sensation; or specific monofilament rating (e.g., 2.0-6.0). Higher scores or "present" indicate better sensory function.
Time frame: 6 months after enrollment
Functional Recovery - Sweating Function
Sweating function of the healed wound area is assessed by sweat test (e.g., starch-iodine test). Unit of Measure: Present vs. absent (or reduced) sweating; or area of sweating (cm²). Higher scores or "present" indicate better sweating function.
Time frame: 6 months after enrollment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.