Narrowing of the carotid artery due to atherosclerosis with an unstable plaque can cause a stroke. Patients with carotid artery disease who have had a TIA or minor stroke and are at high risk of another stroke are often treated with surgery or stenting to remove the plaque. For lower-risk patients, medication alone is the better option, as surgery also carries risks. A new decision method, based on MRI detection of unstable plaques (IMPROVE), can better assess stroke risk and help determine which patients do or do not need surgery. We are investigating whether this method is at least as effective as the standard approach, which mainly considers the degree of narrowing. We expect that this new method will help reduce strokes and lower healthcare costs. Patients will be followed for several years to compare which method is better for health and costs.
SUMMARY: Stroke is the 2nd leading global cause of death and disability. Rupture of a vulnerable carotid plaque causes \~20% of ischemic strokes. Symptomatic patients with carotid stenosis may benefit from surgical removal of the plaque or stenting (revascularisation) to prevent recurrent stroke, but this carries risks. Current patient selection for revascularisation is suboptimal, largely based on stenosis degree without considering plaque vulnerability. Improving risk prediction is therefore crucial and has been formally recognized as a key priority in the Dutch Society for Vascular Surgery's Knowledge Agenda (2022): "How can we better identify patients with carotid stenosis who would or would not benefit from revascularisation?" Presence of intraplaque haemorrhage (IPH) on MRI is one of the most powerful imaging biomarkers of plaque vulnerability and a superior predictor of stroke compared to traditional clinical factors, including degree of stenosis. The recently developed "Individualized MRI- Based Stroke Prediction Score Using Plaque Vulnerability for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Disease Patients" (IMPROVE) clinical prediction model integrates both IPH on MRI and clinical risk factors to calculate ipsilateral ischemic stroke risk. This model has demonstrated significantly improved predictive performance over existing scores. A recent decision-analytic study investigated the impact of the use of IMPROVE to select patients with high stroke risk for revascularisation plus OMT (medication and lifestyle advice) and low-risk patients for OMT (optimized medical therapy)-only. This decision-analytic study showed that implementation of the IMPROVE decision rule for revascularisation selection can lead to 35% less ipsilateral strokes and perioperative strokes and deaths and a lifetime cost reduction of €6101 per patient, equating to an annual reduction in societal healthcare costs of €18 million in the Netherlands alone. Rationale: Patient selection for carotid revascularisation to prevent recurrent strokes could be optimised by providing clinicians and patients the IMPROVE score for shared decision-making. Objective: The primary objective is to investigate the clinical impact and the cost-effectiveness of the individualised MRI-based IMPROVE decision rule compared to care as usual (CAU) in the selection of TIA and non-disabling stroke patients with 30-99% carotid stenosis for revascularisation. Study design: Multicentre, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Study population: Patients with a recent TIA or minor ischemic stroke and ipsilateral 30-99% carotid stenosis according to NASCET criteria. Intervention: For patients that are randomised to the IMPROVE arm, the IMPROVE risk score will be provided as additional information for clinical decision-making on patient stratification for carotid revascularisation plus OMT versus OMT-only. A revascularization procedure in combination with OMT will be advised for patients at high ipsilateral stroke risk (≥10% within 3 years) according to the IMPROVE score, while OMT- only (medication and lifestyle advice) is advised to patients with lower risk scores. Comparator: Patients randomised for the control arm (care-as-usual (CAU)) will be selected for revascularisation based on the guidelines for carotid interventions from the European Society for Vascular Surgery. It advises to consider revascularisation for TIA and stroke patients with ≥50% carotid stenosis. Patients with 30-49% stenosis are treated by OMT-only (medication and lifestyle advice). Plaque vulnerability is not taken into account for patient selection in current clinical care in the Netherlands. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary: Composite of any stroke or death within 44 days after randomisation or ipsilateral ischemic stroke at any time during subsequent 3-5 years follow up. Secondary: a.o. QALYs, number of revascularization procedures, costs.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
613
All patients are screened in routine care for stenosis. The stroke risk is assessed using IMPROVE, incorporating plaque vulnerability (intraplaque haemorrhage (IPH) on MRI), stenosis degree, ischemic event type (ocular vs. cerebral), age and sex. The practitioner and patient discuss treatment options in shared decision making based on this risk score. Patients above the risk threshold (≥10% ipsilateral stroke risk within 3 years) receive a recommendation for revascularisation, those below an advice for OMT-only. The 10% threshold resulted in the largest stroke reduction in the decision analytic study. \~53% of the patients need an extra MRI. In \~47% an MRI is unnecessary since, based on the other risk factors, the stroke risk is already high or low and the MRI result does not affect the risk category.
Rijnstate
Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGRadboud UMC
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGZuyderland
Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGMaastricht University
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
RECRUITINGAmsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGIsala
Zwolle, Overijssel, Netherlands
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis
Dordrecht, South Holland, Netherlands
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGErasmus MC
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHaaglanden MC
The Hague, South Holland, Netherlands
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGUtrecht UMC
Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGThe primary outcome of the study is the composite of any stroke or death within 44 days after randomisation or ipsilateral ischemic stroke at any time during subsequent follow-up.
The perioperative period for the primary endpoint is defined as 44 days after randomisation for both study arms, rather than (the frequently defined) 30 days after carotid revascularisation. This approach avoids bias that would arise if the perioperative window were limited only to patients undergoing revascularisation. By using a fixed 44-day period after randomisation, carotid revascularisation can take place up to two weeks after randomisation without affecting the primary outcome definition, ensuring a fair comparison between treatment arms. The endpoint includes any stroke, including haemorrhagic stroke, as well as death occurring within this period.
Time frame: any strokes/deaths: from randomisation (day 1) until day 44. Ipsilateral ischemic strokes: from randomisation (day 1) through completion of follow-up (36 up to 60 months).
Incidence of other cardiovascular ischemic symptoms (any stroke, myocardial infarction, TIA)
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) through completion of follow-up (36 up to 60 months).
Functional outcome (mRS)
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a measure used to assess a patients functional outcome after a stroke. It is an observational scale in which patients are classified into seven categories according to their functional status. A score of "0" corresponds to no symptoms, and a score of "6" corresponds to death.
Time frame: At day 44 and 3 years after randomisation.
The iMTA (Institute for Medical Technology Assessment) Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)
The goal of the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) is to measure productivity losses due to health problems for use in economic evaluations and health economic studies. Outcomes are reported in (working) days/hours or efficiency loss and there is no fixed total score. Higher values indicate worse productivity loss (e.g. more days absent due to illness or more symptoms during work).
Time frame: From baseline follow-up visit through completion of follow-up (36 up to 60 months).
Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L: EuroQol [Quality of Life-5 dimensions-5 levels]) questionnaire
The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems (=0) up to extreme problems (=5). The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state (Dutch value set). The EQ VAS (virtual analogue scale) records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' = 100 and 'The worst health you can imagine' = 0. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
Time frame: From baseline follow-up visit through completion of follow-up (36 up to 60 months).
The iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)
The iMCQ collects data on medical resource use so that direct healthcare costs can be calculated. Assesses healthcare utilization (e.g., visits, hospitalizations, medication use). Outcomes are reported as frequencies/volumes and there is no fixed total score. Higher volumes/frequenties indicate more healthcare use (and therefore higher costs).
Time frame: From baseline follow-up visit through completion of follow-up (36 up to 60 months).
Number of hospitalizations
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) through completion of follow-up (36 up to 60 months).
Number of carotid revascularisation procedures
The number of carotid revascularisations (carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and stenting) will be determined.
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) through completion of follow-up (36 up to 60 months).
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) through completion of follow-up (36 up to 60 months).
Perioperative complications
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) through completion of follow-up (36 up to 60 months).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.