This is a prospective, multicenter, observational registry designed to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients undergoing complex high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) in China. Eligible patients will be adults with complex coronary artery disease and severely reduced left ventricular function, or reduced left ventricular function with severe mitral regurgitation, who are considered by the heart team to have an indication for coronary revascularization but are at high risk for coronary artery bypass grafting or decline surgical revascularization. The registry will collect baseline clinical characteristics, coronary angiographic and procedural data, use of intravascular imaging or physiological assessment, revascularization strategy, mechanical circulatory support, peri-procedural complications, laboratory and echocardiographic data, and follow-up outcomes. The primary endpoint is all-cause mortality at 1 year after PCI. Secondary endpoints include major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, major bleeding, and quality-of-life measures. The study also aims to identify prognostic factors and develop a risk prediction model for patients undergoing CHIP-PCI.
Complex high-risk indicated patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention represent a clinically challenging population. These patients often have complex coronary anatomy, impaired cardiac function, hemodynamic vulnerability, advanced age, frailty, or multiple comorbidities. Although advances in interventional techniques, adjunctive devices, intravascular imaging, physiological assessment, and mechanical circulatory support have expanded the feasibility of PCI in this population, evidence regarding optimal treatment strategies and long-term outcomes remains limited, particularly in real-world Chinese practice. This study is a prospective, multicenter, observational registry conducted in tertiary hospitals with experience in complex high-risk PCI. The study will enroll approximately 1,000 patients who meet the predefined eligibility criteria and undergo PCI as part of routine clinical care. No additional interventional treatment will be mandated by the protocol. PCI strategy, use of intravascular imaging such as IVUS or OCT, physiological assessment such as FFR or QFR, lesion preparation techniques, complete or incomplete revascularization, staged PCI, antithrombotic therapy, and the use and type of mechanical circulatory support will be determined by the treating physicians according to contemporary guidelines, expert consensus, and local clinical practice. Eligible patients include adults aged 18 to 90 years who are considered by the heart team to have an indication for coronary revascularization but are at high risk for coronary artery bypass grafting or decline CABG, and for whom PCI is considered beneficial. Patients are required to have left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, or left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% with severe mitral regurgitation, together with complex PCI features such as unprotected left main disease, last remaining patent coronary artery PCI, three-vessel disease, heavily calcified lesions requiring rotational atherectomy, or chronic total occlusion requiring bilateral angiography or retrograde techniques. Patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction within 1 week, cardiogenic shock, inability to complete follow-up, or other conditions considered unsuitable by investigators will be excluded. Data collection will include demographic characteristics, medical history, comorbidities, medication use, cardiac function, physical examination, laboratory tests, electrocardiography, echocardiography, quality-of-life assessments, coronary angiography, lesion characteristics, procedural details, use of intravascular imaging or physiological assessment, lesion preparation, mechanical circulatory support, procedural success, completeness of revascularization, residual SYNTAX score, and peri-procedural complications. Follow-up will be performed at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after PCI by outpatient visit or telephone contact. Quality-of-life assessments will be collected at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Clinical events suggestive of cardiovascular outcomes, including chest pain, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or other cardiovascular hospitalization, will be recorded and adjudicated according to predefined endpoint definitions. The primary endpoint is all-cause mortality at 1 year after PCI. Secondary endpoints include 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and heart failure hospitalization; cardiac death; myocardial infarction; target vessel revascularization; heart failure hospitalization; major bleeding defined as BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding; and quality-of-life scores. Additional analyses will evaluate the association between clinical, anatomical, procedural, imaging, physiological, and mechanical circulatory support variables and clinical outcomes. The registry will also be used to develop a risk prediction model to support clinical decision-making in patients undergoing CHIP-PCI. This registry is expected to provide real-world evidence on contemporary CHIP-PCI practice in China, including patient characteristics, procedural strategies, use of adjunctive technologies, short- and long-term outcomes, and predictors of adverse events. The findings may help optimize risk stratification, procedural planning, and post-PCI management in complex high-risk patients.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,000
Percutaneous coronary intervention performed as part of routine clinical care in patients with complex high-risk indicated coronary artery disease. The procedural strategy, use of intravascular imaging or physiological assessment, lesion preparation, revascularization extent, staged PCI, antithrombotic therapy, and use of mechanical circulatory support are determined by the treating physicians according to clinical judgment and local practice. No study-mandated intervention is assigned.
Mechanical circulatory support, including intra-aortic balloon pump, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Impella-like devices, or other support devices, may be used during high-risk PCI at the discretion of the treating physicians. Use of mechanical circulatory support is not mandated by the study protocol and will be analyzed as an observational exposure.
Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Beijing, China
All-cause Mortality at 1 Year After PCI
The proportion of participants who die from any cause within 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Time frame: 1 year after PCI
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events at 1 Year After PCI
The proportion of participants who experience a major adverse cardiovascular event within 1 year after PCI. Major adverse cardiovascular events are defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure.
Time frame: 1 year after PCI
Cardiac death at 1 year after PCI
The proportion of participants who die from cardiac causes within 1 year after PCI. Cardiac death includes death due to acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, pulmonary edema, cardiac perforation or tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction disturbance, procedure-related cerebrovascular events within 30 days, procedure-related complications, or death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded.
Time frame: 1 year after PCI
Myocardial Infarction at 1 Year After PCI
The proportion of participants who experience myocardial infarction within 1 year after PCI, including peri-procedural myocardial infarction and spontaneous myocardial infarction according to predefined study criteria.
Time frame: 1 year after PCI
Target Vessel Revascularization at 1 Year After PCI
The proportion of participants who undergo repeat revascularization of the target vessel within 1 year after PCI.
Time frame: 1 year after PCI
Hospitalization for Heart Failure at 1 Year After PCI
The proportion of participants hospitalized for worsening heart failure within 1 year after PCI. Heart failure hospitalization is defined as hospitalization lasting at least 24 hours due to worsening heart failure symptoms, with a documented diagnosis of heart failure and initiation or intensification of heart failure therapy.
Time frame: 1 year after PCI
Major Bleeding at 1 Year After PCI
The proportion of participants who experience major bleeding within 1 year after PCI. Major bleeding is defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or type 5 bleeding.
Time frame: 1 year after PCI
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by EQ-5D-5L
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire. Scores will be collected at baseline and during follow-up to evaluate changes after PCI.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after PCI
Change in Angina-Related Quality of Life Assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Angina-related symptoms, functional status, and quality of life will be assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Scores will be collected at baseline and during follow-up to evaluate changes after PCI.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after PCI
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.