In France, digestive cancers are responsible for more than 40,000 deaths per year, or approximately 30% of cancer-related deaths. Surgery is central to the patient's journey, particularly their treatment, and postoperative complications, whether cardiovascular, respiratory, infectious, thromboembolic, or related to postoperative pain, remain common and can have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and long-term outcomes. The implementation of continuous monitoring contributes to optimizing the care pathway and is necessary to improve postoperative outcomes. Postoperatively, remote monitoring has proven its effectiveness in significantly reducing postoperative readmission rates, particularly among patients who have undergone colorectal surgery. It allows for rapid intervention in the event of frequent complications, thus preventing unnecessary hospitalizations. To date, no study has evaluated the efficacy and safety of such a remote monitoring tool compared to conventional management on the clinical and organizational consequences postoperatively. Maela® is an app that allows patients to complete a symptom tracking questionnaire using a mobile device for 90 days following surgery. Surgeons can track new alerts via the solution's web interface. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the Maela® medical remote monitoring device after elective digestive oncology surgery compared to conventional management.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Patients will benefit from the Maela® solution from the surgical scheduling visit until 90 days (+/- 15 days) following surgery. Maela will be use by patient to answer online questionnaire, which will generate alerts based on the responses. If an alert is generated, the surgeon or their nurse may see the patient early and adapt the care. The management will be at the discretion of the healthcare professionals
CH Sud Francilien
Corbeil-Essonnes, France
Hôpital Nord
Marseille, France
CHRU Nancy Brabois
Nancy, France
Hôpital Saint-Antoine
Paris, France
CHU Rouen
Rouen, France
Evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the Maela® medical remote monitoring device after scheduled digestive oncology surgery compared to conventional management
Presence/absence at day 90 post-surgery defined as the composite of : * A grade III to IV complication according to the Clavien-Dindo classification AND/OR * A post-operative readmission related to surgery (defined by an unscheduled readmission and/or a visit to the emergency room).
Time frame: Day 90 post-surgery
Evaluate the effectiveness of remote monitoring using the Maela® solution on post-operative consequences in patients following their oncodigestive surgery
Presence of at least one grade III to IV complication according to the Clavien-Dindo scale at Day 30 and day 90 post-surgery
Time frame: Day 30 and day 90 post-surgery
Evaluate the effectiveness of remote monitoring using the Maela® solution on post-operative consequences in patients following their oncodigestive surgery
Number of postoperative readmissions related to surgery (defined by an unscheduled readmission and/or a visit to the emergency room) at Day 30 and day 90 post-surgery
Time frame: Day 30 and day 90 post-surgery
Evaluate the effectiveness of remote monitoring using the Maela® solution on post-operative consequences in patients following their oncodigestive surgery
Number of postoperative complications according to grade according to the Clavien-Dindo classification at Day 30 and day 90 post-surgery
Time frame: Day 30 and day 90 post-surgery
Evaluate the effectiveness of remote monitoring using the Maela® solution on post-operative consequences in patients following their oncodigestive surgery
Number of prolonged hospital stays defined as the 75th percentile of the initial length of stay in hospitalized patients at Day 30 and day 90 post-surgery
Time frame: Day 30 and day 90 post-surgery
Evaluate the effectiveness of remote monitoring using the Maela® solution on post-operative consequences in patients following their oncodigestive surgery
Change in pain intensity on Day 1 (24 hours post-surgery) assessed by the VAS scale (0-10) at Day 30 and day 90 post-surgery
Time frame: Day 1 (24 hours), Day 30 and day 90 post-surgery
Evaluate the impact of remote monitoring using the Maela® solution on patients' quality of life
Change in quality-of-life score using the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire at inclusion, D30 and D90
Time frame: D0, Day 30 and day 90 post-surgery
Evaluate the impact of remote monitoring using the Maela® solution on patients' quality of life
Change in postoperative recovery quality score using the QoR-15 scale (0-10) at D1 (24 hours post-surgery), D30 and D90
Time frame: D1 (24hours), Day 30 and Day 90 post-surgery
Assess the organizational impact linked to the deployment of the Maela® solution according to the HAS mapping
Number of days spent outside the hospital (initial hospitalization and re-hospitalization) within 90 days following surgery
Time frame: Day 90 post-surgery
Assess the organizational impact linked to the deployment of the Maela® solution according to the HAS mapping
Number of unscheduled consultations without hospitalization and related to surgery (with a general practitioner or surgeon) within 90 days following surgery
Time frame: Day 90 post-surgery
Evaluate the medical and economic benefit of patient monitoring with the Maela® solution
Evaluate the medical and economic benefit of patient monitoring with the Maela® solution
Time frame: Day 90 post-surgery
Assess the satisfaction and usability of the solution by healthcare professionals during the two study periods and by patients in the experimental group
Monthly compliance rate for remote monitoring at D30 and D90, defined by the formula: Compliance rate = (Number of completed questionnaires / Total number of questionnaires) x 100
Time frame: Day 30 and day 90 post-surgery
Assess the satisfaction and usability of the solution by healthcare professionals during the two study periods and by patients in the experimental group
Average alert management time, defined by the time between alert issuance and resolution at D90
Time frame: Day 90 post-surgery
Assess the satisfaction and usability of the solution by healthcare professionals during the two study periods and by patients in the experimental group
Usability assessed by the French version of the SUS (System Usability Scale) questionnaire by patients at D90
Time frame: Day 90 post-surgery
Assess the satisfaction and usability of the solution by healthcare professionals during the two study periods and by patients in the experimental group
Patient satisfaction assessed by a specific qualitative questionnaire completed at D90
Time frame: Day 90 post-surgery
Assess the satisfaction and usability of the solution by healthcare professionals during the two study periods and by patients in the experimental group
Healthcare professional satisfaction assessed by a specific qualitative questionnaire completed at the end of each period (control and intervention)
Time frame: At the end of the control period (Month 1 to Month 6, depending of the time the intervention begin) and at the end of the interventionnal period (Month 12) for each center
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.