For patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) ≤5 cm, Clinical guidelines recommend surgery, but a growing number of studies have shown that thermal ablation is as effective as surgery. However, the optimal treatment strategy remains unclear.This study aimed to compare outcomes between patients who underwent ablation with systemic therapy or liver resection with systemic therapy for CRLM less than 5 cm in diameter.
Currently, the multidisciplinary team (MDT) model is recommended for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases in clinical practice, with personalized treatment goals and comprehensive treatment to achieve a tumor-free state. For liver metastases that are initially curable, surgical treatment should be performed in a timely manner. Although there are some controversies, surgical resection combined with systemic therapy is still considered the standard treatment . Liver resection alone may not be able to achieve complete cure, while preoperative systemic therapy can help eradicate micro-metastases, and postoperative systemic therapy can reduce the recurrence rate.For liver metastases that are initially unresectable, some lesions can be converted to resectable lesions through systemic therapy with or without targeted therapy. Recently, a phase Ⅲ randomized controlled clinical trial showed that thermal ablation and surgical resection achieve similar overall survival and progression-free survival for patients with resectable CRLM of 3 cm or less in diameter. However, for CRLM of 5 cm or less in diameter, the optimal treatment strategy remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and local recurrence rate (LRR) between patients with CRLM less than 5 cm in diameter who underwent ultrasound-guided ablation with systemic therapy and liver resection with systemic therapy.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
151
ltrasound-guided Microwave Ablation was performed using a GE LOGIQ E9 system with a C1-6 transducer, Nanjing Yigao ECO-100A1/ECO-100AL9 microwave device, and ECO-200F/100A6 disposable needles. Sonovue was used for CEUS. Single-needle multi-point ablation was performed for lesions \<3 cm, and double-needle ablation for lesions ≥3 cm, with needles ≤2 cm apart. Ablation power was 50-60 W, with a 3-6 min duration per point.Real-time ultrasound guided needle placement to avoid surrounding structures. After ablation, the needle was withdrawn, and the track sealed.Post-procedure, grayscale or CEUS confirmed the ablation coverage with a 5-10 mm safety margin. A follow-up CEUS was performed 1 day later to assess treatment efficacy. Systemic therapy was given for approximately 6 cycles. Patients received systemic therapy 2-4 weeks before or after ablation. Systemic therapy regimens included FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFOXIRI, with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab.
Laparoscopic Partial Liver Resection：Patients underwent laparoscopic partial liver resection, including exploration for extrahepatic metastases, resection of the liver lesion with surrounding tissue, and placement of a drainage tube. The procedure is performed under CO2 pneumoperitoneum with minimal invasive access via multiple ports. Systemic therapy was given for approximately 6 cycles. Patients received systemic therapy 2-4 weeks before or after liver resection. Systemic therapy regimens included FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFOXIRI, with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab.
The First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, China
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Disease progression is defined as the appearance of metastatic tumors outside the liver or local recurrence or new tumors within the liver.The definition of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) is the time from the start of treatment to disease progression or death.
Time frame: 1year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.