The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether AGENCIA, a brief psychological program supported by digital technology and artificial intelligence, can help reduce emotional and behavioral difficulties in adolescents aged 12 to 18. These difficulties may include irritability, impulsive behaviors, conflicts at home or at school, or difficulties in managing intense emotions. The study also aims to determine whether the effects are similar across adolescents with different symptom profiles or neurodevelopmental characteristics. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: AGENCIA Digital: a self-guided online version completed at home. AGENCIA in-person with a digital assistant: a clinician-delivered version supported by an interactive digital assistant to guide the exercises. Digital psychoeducation (control): a self-guided online program providing general information about adolescent well-being. The main research questions are: Does AGENCIA reduce overall emotional and behavioral difficulties? Does the program improve functioning, family accommodation, and personal agency (a young person's sense of being able to act and make changes)? Are the effects similar across adolescents with different profiles or neurodevelopmental characteristics? Participants will: * Complete three structured sessions depending on their assigned group. * Complete brief online questionnaires at baseline (T0), immediately after the sessions (T1), and at 1-month (T2) and 6-month (T3) follow-ups. * Receive brief phone calls during follow-ups to support questionnaire completion. A total of 465 adolescents will take part in the study. Participation is voluntary and does not replace usual clinical care. The study does not involve medication or invasive procedures, and all digital tools operate within secure institutional systems.
This study is situated at the intersection of mental health, technological innovation, and artificial intelligence, incorporating advanced digital tools and conversational systems as supportive elements for psychological assessment and intervention in clinical settings. Within this framework, the project explores how technology can facilitate the delivery of brief, scalable, and more personalized interventions in child and adolescent mental health. This study is a three-arm randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of AGENCIA, a brief, mechanism-focused psychological intervention for adolescents aged 12 to 18 receiving care in routine mental health services. Adolescents in this age range often experience emotional and behavioral difficulties that affect daily functioning at home, school, and in social contexts. These difficulties may include irritability, impulsivity, conflicts with caregivers, or challenges in managing strong emotions, and they may occur with or without a formal neurodevelopmental diagnosis. AGENCIA is a structured psychological program delivered in three sessions. It aims to strengthen personal agency, improve emotional regulation and self-compassion, support action toward meaningful goals, and help families reduce accommodation behaviors that may limit adolescents' autonomy. The study evaluates two delivery formats: a self-guided digital version and a clinician-delivered in-person version supported by an interactive conversational assistant. A third group receives digital psychoeducation, which provides general information about adolescent well-being without active therapeutic components. The trial will recruit 465 participants, who will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the study groups. The design is trans diagnostic and dimensional, including adolescents with emotional or behavioral difficulties that interfere with daily functioning, regardless of diagnostic status. Recruitment takes place across child and adolescent mental health services and primary care settings in Spain. Assessments are conducted at baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1), at 1-month follow-up (T2), and at 6-month follow-up (T3). All assessments are digital and include measures of emotional and behavioral difficulties, functioning, quality of life, family accommodation, and personal agency. The primary outcome is the change in the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Total Difficulties Score) from baseline to the 1-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include symptom subscales, emotional dysregulation, functioning, interference in daily life, quality of life, family accommodation, and personal agency. Exploratory analyses will examine whether early changes in personal agency or family accommodation predict later improvement, and whether treatment effects differ across clinical profiles or neurodevelopmental traits. The study is considered low-risk. It does not involve medication, invasive procedures, or unsupervised generative AI tools. Digital components run on secure institutional servers. Safety monitoring includes routine screening for acute clinical risk at multiple time points, with established referral procedures within the mental health system. Participation is voluntary, and adolescents continue to receive their usual clinical care during the study. Data are de-identified, securely stored, and may be shared upon reasonable request and ethical approval.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
465
AGENCIA Digital Self-Guided is a brief, structured psychological intervention designed to strengthen personal agency in adolescents with emotional and behavioral difficulties. The program includes three sessions focused on improving emotion regulation and self-compassion, supporting value-based actions, promoting gradual engagement with meaningful activities, and reducing family accommodation. In the self-guided digital format, participants complete the three sessions independently on a secure online platform with audiovisual materials and experiential exercises.
AGENCIA In-person With Digital Assistant is a brief, structured psychological intervention aimed at strengthening personal agency and improving emotional and behavioral functioning in adolescents. It consists of three core sessions addressing emotion regulation, self-compassion, value-based actions, meaningful goal pursuit, and the reduction of family accommodation. In the in-person format, a mental health professional delivers the intervention in person, while a conversational digital assistant guides structured exercises and presents session content. The clinician supervises and ensures safe, consistent delivery. The therapeutic ingredients and objectives of AGENCIA remain identical to those used in the self-guided format.
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
Seville, Spain
SDQ Total Difficulties Score
Change in emotional and behavioral difficulties measured with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties Score. The scale includes 20 items assessing emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, and peer problems. The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater difficulties. * 0-13: Close to average * 14-16: Slightly raised * 17-19: High * 20-40: Very high The primary comparison is change from baseline day 0 to the 1-month follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (T0), Within 1 week post-intervention (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2), and 6-month follow-up (T3)
SDQ Subscale Scores (Emotional, Conduct, Hyperactivity/Inattention, Peer, Prosocial)
Subscale scores of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) capturing specific emotional and behavioral areas. The SDQ consists of 25 items divided into 5 subscales, each containing 5 items rated on a 3-point scale (0 = not true, 1 = somewhat true, 2 = certainly true). Each subscale score ranges from 0 to 10. For the Emotional Symptoms, Conduct Problems, Hyperactivity/Inattention, and Peer Problems subscales, higher scores indicate greater difficulties. For the Prosocial Behavior subscale, higher scores indicate better functioning.
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline Day 0 (T0), Within 1 week post-intervention (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2), and 6-month follow-up (T3)
SDQ-Impact Score (Functional Impairment)
Index of functional impairment associated with emotional and behavioral symptoms, including impact on home life, friendships, school learning, and overall distress, measured with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Impact Supplement. The impact score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline Day 0 (T0), Within 1 week post-intervention (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2), and 6-month follow-up (T3)
Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Subscales
Measures irritability, lethargy/withdrawal, stereotypy, hyperactivity/non-compliance, and inappropriate speech using the Aberrant Behavior Checklist. The ABC consists of 58 items across 5 subscales, each scored from 0 (not a problem) to 3 (severe problem). Subscale score ranges are: Irritability (0-45), Lethargy/Social Withdrawal (0-48), Stereotypic Behavior (0-21), Hyperactivity/Noncompliance (0-48), and Inappropriate Speech (0-12). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline Day 0 (T0), Within 1 week post-intervention (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2), and 6-month follow-up (T3)
HoNOSCA-SR Total Score
Self-reported global functioning across emotional, behavioral, social, and daily living domains measured with the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents - Self-Rated (HoNOSCA-SR). The scale consists of 13 items, each rated from 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline Day 0 (T0), Within 1 week post-intervention (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2), and 6-month follow-up (T3)
EQ-5 Dimension-5 Level Index Score (Quality of Life)
Health-related quality of life index measured with the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire, covering mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The index score is calculated using country-specific value sets and ranges from less than 0 (states worse than dead) to 1.0 (perfect health), with higher scores reflecting better health status.
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline Day 0 (T0), Within 1 week post-intervention (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2), and 6-
Family Accommodation (FASA / FASA-CR Total Score)
Extent to which caregivers or adolescents engage in accommodation behaviors that may maintain emotional/behavioral difficulties, measured with the Family Accommodation Scale - Anxiety (FASA) for parents and FASA-Child Report (FASA-CR) for adolescents. The FASA total score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating more accommodation.
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline Day 0 (T0), Within 1 week post-intervention (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2), and 6-month follow-up (T3)
Children's Hope Scale - Agency Subscale (CHS-Agency)
Assesses adolescents' sense of personal agency (ability to initiate and sustain goal-directed actions) using the Children's Hope Scale - Agency Subscale. The agency subscale consists of 3 items, each rated from 1 to 6, yielding a subscale score range of 3 to 18, with higher scores indicating stronger perceived agency.
Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline Day 0 (T0), Within 1 week post-intervention (T1), 1-month follow-up (T2), and 6-month follow-up (T3)
Usability, Acceptability, and Satisfaction Questionnaire
Self-reported ratings of satisfaction with the intervention, ease of use, perceived helpfulness, and likelihood of recommending it, measured with an ad hoc Usability and Satisfaction Questionnaire developed for this study. The questionnaire includes 7 closed-ended items assessing perceived benefit, treatment planning, motivation to use strategies, likelihood of recommendation, and modality-specific usability (digital platform, in-person, or conversational AI agent). Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0 = No, 1 = A little, 2 = Yes, 3 = Very much). Individual item scores range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater usability, acceptability, and satisfaction. The questionnaire also includes one open-ended item for qualitative feedback.
Time frame: Within 1 week post-intervention (T1)
Relational Openness / Self-Disclosure
Relational openness measured with an ad hoc 4-item self-disclosure scale developed for this study, assessing the tendency to talk about oneself, share feelings, express beliefs and opinions, and feel comfortable revealing one's true self during the intervention. Items are adapted to the intervention format (AI conversational agent, therapist-led, or web/app-based). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree), with total scores ranging from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate greater relational openness.
Time frame: Within 1 week post-intervention (T1)
Perceived Alliance (Session Rating Scale, SRS)
Working alliance measured with the Session Rating Scale (SRS), a 4-item visual analog scale assessing relationship bond (feeling heard, understood, and respected), agreement on goals and topics, agreement on approach or method, and overall session quality. Each item is rated on a 0-10 visual analog scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate stronger perceived therapeutic alliance.
Time frame: Within 1 week post-intervention (T1)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.