The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and acute safety of the dual electrical cardioversion (ECV) technique compared with the conventional ECV in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. The main question it aims to answer are: * Is dual ECV more effective than conventional ECV to achieve sinus rhythm restoration? * Is dual ECV safe compared with conventional ECV? * Which are the main factors associated with cardioversion success? Researchers will compare a dual ECV technique with 400J with dual ECV with 200J and conventional ECV. Participants will be randomized to one ECV configuration. The primary efficacy endpoint will be considered the percentage of patients with successful cardioversion with the first shock. The coprimary safety endpoint will be the occurrence of adverse events during ECV.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
177
Defibrillation pads will be placed in the anteroposterior or anterolateral position. An initial biphasic shock of 200 J will be delivered. If sinus rhythm is not restored, a second dual shock of 400 J (crossover) will be administered. The procedures will be performed in the designated area for such procedures at each center, under deep sedation in accordance with each center's standard protocols. The choice of medication used for sedation will be at the investigator's discretion. All shocks will be delivered using biphasic energy and ECG-synchronized.
Two pairs of defibrillation pads connected to two different defibrillators will be used. One pair of pads will be placed in the anterolateral position and the second pair in the anteroposterior position. Both defibrillators will be programmed to deliver a biphasic shock of 100 J each (200 J group) or 200 J each (400 J group) simultaneously. The maximum number of CVE attempts per patient will be 3. The procedures will be performed in the designated area for such procedures at each center, under deep sedation in accordance with each center's standard protocols. The choice of medication used for sedation will be at the investigator's discretion. All shocks will be delivered using biphasic energy and synchronized with the QRS complex.
Primary Efficacy Outcome - Patients achieving sinus rhythm with the first shock
Percentage of patients achieving sinus rhythm with the first shock deliver. Three consecutive beats in sinus rhythm are neccesary to consider sinus rhythm achieved.
Time frame: First minute after first shock delivery
Primary Safety Outcome - Adverse events during the procedure
Ocurrence of any complication during the ECV. Arrhythmic recurrences of atrial fibrillation will not be considered as complications.
Time frame: Before patient are discharged
Overall Procedural Sucess
Percentage of patients achieving stable sinus rhythm after any number of shocks
Time frame: The end of the procedure
Overall Intervention-Specific Success
Number of successful shocks / Overall delivered shock within the same pad configuration.
Time frame: First minute after shock delivery
Total Energy Delivered
Total energy administered (J) before the procedure is completed
Time frame: End of the procedure
Sub-acute procedural success
Percentage of patients in sinus rhythm at 30 days after the ECV
Time frame: At 30 (25-35) days after the procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.