2.1 CONTEXT Pain and agitation are common comorbidities of pediatric critical illness due to both underlying disease processes and ICU related therapies. These are associated with both short and long term negative sequelae including increased mortality, length of stay, rates of ICU delirium, worse sleep, increased anxiety, depression, and chronic pain. The current standard of care to manage PICU associated pain and agitation is the use of analgosedation (e.g. opioids and benzodiazepines) these too are associated with increased time on the ventilator, length of stay, ICU delirium, and long term mental health and negative neuro-cognitive outcomes. Despite recommendations for increased use of non-pharmacologic therapies in the prevention and management of PICU associated pain, agitation, delirium, and analgosedation exposure, there are currently know therapies with clear evidence of efficacy. Therapeutic cuddling (e.g. kangaroo care, clothed cuddling, comfort holding, etc.) has been shown to decrease pain and anxiety in critically ill neonates, and healthy children and adults. Positive affective touch and hugging has known physiologic benefits and has been associated with decreased pain, improved immunity, and decreased mortality. Despite the potential for this intervention to aid in the prevention and management of PICU associated pain, agitation, delirium and analgosedation exposure, little data exists on efficacy of therapeutic cuddling in critically ill children. 2.2 OBJECTIVES 2.2.1 Primary Determine the feasibility of screening, consent, randomization, and retention of participants in a pragmatic RCT of therapeutic cuddling versus standard of care in the Alberta Children's Hospital Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. 2.2.2 Secondary 1. Determine treatment fidelity of participants randomized to the intervention arm. 2. Determine the prevalence of the therapeutic cuddling intervention in those randomized to the standard of care arm. 3. Determine the feasibility of measurement of key outcomes and co-variates (i.e., pain, agitation, sedation, delirium, analgosedation exposure, parental presence). 4. Describe the experience of patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals in delivering/receiving the therapeutic cuddling intervention. 2.3 STUDY DESIGN Pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial of a structured co-designed therapeutic cuddling intervention as compared to the standard of care in a single tertiary care PICU. 2.4 DURATION 6 months to 1 year 2.5 LOCATION, DEPARTMENTS, AND FACILITY WHERE RESEARCH WILL BE UNDERTAKEN The pediatric intensive care unit at the Alberta Children's Hospital 2.6 SAMPLE SIZE A total sample size of 112 participants (56 per arm)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
112
In bed or out of bed cuddling provided by a caregiver that involves at least two points of body contact with at least one providing pressure (e.g. arm over the torso or child in lap of parent)
Cuddling or not as decided by the care team.
Alberta Children's Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
RECRUITINGFeasibility of randomization
Proportion of those consented who are successfully randomized.
Time frame: From PICU admission to end of enrollment period (96 hours) or PICU discharge whichever occurs first
Feasibility of consent
Proportion of patients who are approached who provide consent.
Time frame: From PICU admission to end of enrollment period (96 hours) or PICU discharge whichever occurs first
Ability to retain participants
Proportion of randomized participants who complete study procedures
Time frame: From PICU admission to end of enrollment period (96 hours) or PICU discharge whichever occurs first
Prevalence of the therapeutic cuddling intervention in those randomized to the standard of care arm
Proportion of shifts with 1 or more cuddling events out of all shifts for those randomized to the standard of care arm
Time frame: From enrollment up to 14 study days or PICU discharge, whichever occurs first.
Feasibility of measurement of key outcomes and co-variates (i.e., pain, agitation, sedation, delirium, analgosedation exposure, parental presence)
Proportion of participants with complete data entry for each variable of interest
Time frame: From enrollment up to 14 study days or PICU discharge whichever occurs first
Describe the experience of patients in receiving the therapeutic cuddling intervention
Conduct 1:1 interviews for patients
Time frame: Until the end of the study period, expected to complete within 18 months.
Describe the experiences of parents with therapeutic cuddling
1:1 interviews
Time frame: Until the end of the study period, expected to completed within 18 months.
Experience of HCP with delivering Therapeutic Cuddling
1:1 Interviews
Time frame: Until study completion, an average of 18 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.