Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) presents a significant clinical challenge, as over 60% of patients are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage with a high risk of recurrence. Although the landmark KEYNOTE-689 trial established neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy as a new standard of care, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate remains unsatisfactory at only 3.0%, highlighting an urgent need for optimized combination strategies. This prospective, single-arm, single-center clinical study aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of a novel neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimen combining an engineered mitochondrial vaccine (IMP3-Mito) with ICIs for patients with resectable, IMP3-positive locally advanced HNSCC. The rationale is based on a "Prime-and-Release" synergistic mechanism: the engineered mitochondrial vaccine serves as a potent "natural adjuvant" to activate dendritic cells and prime tumor-specific T-cell responses against the IMP3 antigen, while the ICI subsequently releases the immune brakes within the tumor microenvironment. By integrating these two modalities, the study seeks to achieve deeper pathological responses and improve long-term survival, while simultaneously providing clinical evidence for the transformative potential of the mitochondrial engineering platform in overcoming the limitations of conventional tumor vaccines.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
9
A vaccine targeting the IMP3 antigen, utilizing an engineered mitochondrial platform. Administered via subcutaneous injection.
PD-1 inhibitor administered via intravenous infusion to synergistic with the mitochondrial vaccine.
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGWest China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
RECRUITINGMajor Pathologic Response
Major Pathologic Response (MPR) was defined as fewer than 10% viable tumor cells.
Time frame: At the time of surgery (approximately 6 weeks after enrollment).
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE. The number of participants who experienced an AE was reported for each arm.
Time frame: From the first dose until the completion of the 12-month post-operative follow-up (approximately 14 months in total).
Pathologic Complete Response
Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) was defined as the absence of viable tumor cells.
Time frame: At the time of surgery (approximately 6 weeks after enrollment).
Objective Response Rate
Objective Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR using RECIST Criteria.
Time frame: From the start of neoadjuvant therapy to the end of neoadjuvant therapy, the duration is approximately 2 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.